Welcome, Guest.
CLICK HERE TO REGISTER


Welcome to BirdForum.
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community, dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is absolutely FREE! You are most welcome to register for an account, which allows you to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 5 votes, 5.00 average.
Old Saturday 4th September 2004, 04:27   #1
BirdsPeru
Alejandro Tabini

 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Lima - Peru
Posts: 760
One more Gull

Seems like I have all my gull pictures ID with the wrong names, so I will need some more help with this pictures.

They were taken in Argentina some kilometers from Buenos Aires. Hope any can help me. By the way, this pictures were taken going inside a cave so I use flash in the camera that washed out some details maybe.

Alejandro
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Gull2.jpg
Views:	98
Size:	11.4 KB
ID:	13077  Click image for larger version

Name:	Gull3.jpg
Views:	106
Size:	19.7 KB
ID:	13078  Click image for larger version

Name:	Gull1.jpg
Views:	87
Size:	21.1 KB
ID:	13079  

BirdsPeru is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Saturday 4th September 2004, 13:49   #2
HouseCrow
Registered User

 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: netherlands
Posts: 147
Could this be Kelp Gull?

cheers,
HouseCrow
HouseCrow is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Saturday 4th September 2004, 20:40   #3
Rasmus Boegh
BF member
 
Rasmus Boegh's Avatar

 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: right next door
Posts: 3,804
Yes, that's a Kelp Gull (Larus dominicanus). Compared to other Argentinean gulls note white tail, dark upperparts and bill (shape & colour).

Last edited by Rasmus Boegh : Saturday 4th September 2004 at 21:08. Reason: typo
Rasmus Boegh is offline  
Reply With Quote
BF Supporter BF Supporter 2008
Click here to Support BirdForum
Old Sunday 5th September 2004, 01:01   #4
BirdsPeru
Alejandro Tabini

 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Lima - Peru
Posts: 760
Thanks Rasmus and HouseCrow, I was thinking about Kelp Gull but this family still keep me confuse as there are many that look almost the same. As I mention it would be a long way until I learn to ID Gulls, but always learning something thanks to all in this forum.

Alejandro
BirdsPeru is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Friday 17th September 2004, 01:06   #5
Fritz73
Super Moderator
 
Fritz73's Avatar

 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Hamburg, Germany
Posts: 6,843
It's a Kelp Gull (Larus dominicanus). There is only one Gull wich is similar: Olrog's Gull (Larus atlanticus) but in this case the colors in the bill are diferent and also tail.
Fritz73 is offline  
Reply With Quote
BF Supporter BF Supporter 2004 BF Supporter 2005 BF Supporter 2006 BF Supporter 2007 BF Supporter 2008 BF Supporter 2009
Click here to Support BirdForum
Old Friday 17th September 2004, 06:21   #6
Katy Penland
Registered User
 
Katy Penland's Avatar

 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Pine Mountain, California, USA
Posts: 10,641
If I may ask what is undoubtedly a dumb question, but if this is an adult Kelp, why aren't the eyes yellow? The bird pictured is clearly dark-eyed.
Katy Penland is offline  
Reply With Quote
BF Supporter BF Supporter 2004 BF Supporter 2005 BF Supporter 2006 BF Supporter 2007 BF Supporter 2008
Click here to Support BirdForum
Old Saturday 18th September 2004, 02:44   #7
BirdsPeru
Alejandro Tabini

 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Lima - Peru
Posts: 760
Katy as far as I know, Kelp Gull (Larus dominicanus) have dark iris and not yellow one. The other similar bird is LBB and that one have yellow iris.

Now I am not an expert and talking about gulls need to learn a lot. So maybe I am wrong so let the experts say about this.

Alejandro
BirdsPeru is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Saturday 18th September 2004, 03:00   #8
Katy Penland
Registered User
 
Katy Penland's Avatar

 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Pine Mountain, California, USA
Posts: 10,641
Quote:
Originally Posted by BirdsPeru
Katy as far as I know, Kelp Gull (Larus dominicanus) have dark iris and not yellow one. The other similar bird is LBB and that one have yellow iris.

Now I am not an expert and talking about gulls need to learn a lot. So maybe I am wrong so let the experts say about this.

Alejandro
I'm no expert, but the Sibley's book in my hand says about Larus dominicanus: "Pale grayish-yellow iris; red orbital ring," and the accompanying drawing shows yellow eyes in both breeding and non-breeding adult plumage. Only the first two years of this three-year gull show a dark eye.

Unless there's a regional variation in adult eye color?
Katy Penland is offline  
Reply With Quote
BF Supporter BF Supporter 2004 BF Supporter 2005 BF Supporter 2006 BF Supporter 2007 BF Supporter 2008
Click here to Support BirdForum
Old Saturday 18th September 2004, 04:17   #9
Larry Lade
Moderator
 
Larry Lade's Avatar

 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Saint Joseph, Missouri, USA
Posts: 8,114
Blog Entries: 3
We are discussing what our "mystery gull" here in Missouri is. Some seem to think it is a Kelp Gull or Kelp/Herring hybrid. So your photos are of particular interest to me.

What color would you say your birds feet/legs are? To me they have a somewhat pinkish look. Sibley says that Kelp Gulls have dull greenish-gray to yellowish legs. I would think that a 3rd year bird should have a yellowish iris and a red orbital ring (as Katy mentioned). The bird in your photo does not show these characteristics. I am not familiar with South American Gulls, but I would think that this bird is not a Kelp Gull.
__________________
Larry
Larry Lade is offline  
Reply With Quote
BF Supporter BF Supporter 2004 BF Supporter 2005 BF Supporter 2006 BF Supporter 2007 BF Supporter 2008 BF Supporter 2009
Click here to Support BirdForum
Old Saturday 18th September 2004, 06:02   #10
Tommie Rogers
Registered User

 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: MO, USA
Posts: 1
Your gull has characteristics of a Kelp Gull, but it has a dark iris and pink/gray legs.
Kelp should have yellow/green legs and a yellow iris with a red orbital ring.
I am using Peter Harrison's SEABIRDS guide and Sibley's guide for this information.

Last edited by Tommie Rogers : Saturday 18th September 2004 at 06:12. Reason: additional comment
Tommie Rogers is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Saturday 18th September 2004, 06:29   #11
Rasmus Boegh
BF member
 
Rasmus Boegh's Avatar

 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: right next door
Posts: 3,804
This is a fine Kelp Gull, though I do understand the confusion. I have literally seen thousands (most of them in South America where these photos were taken) and the eye-ring is fine - it often appears very vague. Normally the eye is pale, but how pale seem to vary and also be dependant on illumination (note: the photos were taken inside a cave using a flash). The leg colouration is also well within the variation I have seen (check the second & third link for individuals with a similar colour of the legs). Do note that many gulls - especially when breeding - can show unusually pale legs; basically because they sit in their own faeces.

Here's a sample of photos showing Kelp's:

http://www.mangoverde.com/birdsound/...ic67-13-3.html
http://www.avesdechile.cl/149.htm
http://www.bway.net/~lewis/birds/trind/kelp-2.jpg
http://gianfvil.gamersrevolt.it/Sud%...20gull%202.htm
http://www.sunsetbeach.co.za/images/kelp_gull_01.jpg
http://www.abtao.cl/Imagenes/birdwa15.jpg
http://www.livingtravel.com/africa/s...s/bird0139.jpg
http://www.v-liz.co.uk/namibia/birds/kelpg.jpg

Last edited by Rasmus Boegh : Saturday 18th September 2004 at 07:14.
Rasmus Boegh is offline  
Reply With Quote
BF Supporter BF Supporter 2008
Click here to Support BirdForum
Old Saturday 18th September 2004, 07:24   #12
Katy Penland
Registered User
 
Katy Penland's Avatar

 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Pine Mountain, California, USA
Posts: 10,641
Well, if the bird being discussed here, and the 5 -- now 8 -- internet examples Rasmus has given are indicative, then a light eye cannot be considered a diagnostic field mark for this species, since a light eye is not in evidence in any of the 9 pictures. Even taking that first URL of Rasmus' and brightening what is a terribly under-exposed photo, the eye is still dark.

It would appear that either the Sibley's guide (and accompanying drawings) overstates the lightness of the eyes for this sp, or eye color is highly variable (sub-species variation?). One thing for sure: It points up again that photo ID is less than reliable for accurate representation and is no substitute for concerted field observation.

Just for fun, here are some light-eyed kelps:

http://home.earthlink.net/~pomarine/id1.html
http://home.earthlink.net/~pomarine/id2.html
http://peter.maxitec.co.za/birdingaf...irds_Gull.html
http://www.mdbirds.org/birds/gallery/gallery4.html

Question for Rasmus and others who have seen lots of this species: Is flat-headedness a typical trait of kelp gulls? In many of the internet photos I ran across, when shot from the side the birds appear to be quite flat-headed.
Katy Penland is offline  
Reply With Quote
BF Supporter BF Supporter 2004 BF Supporter 2005 BF Supporter 2006 BF Supporter 2007 BF Supporter 2008
Click here to Support BirdForum
Old Saturday 18th September 2004, 07:35   #13
Rasmus Boegh
BF member
 
Rasmus Boegh's Avatar

 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: right next door
Posts: 3,804
Quote:
Originally Posted by Katy Penland
the 5 -- now 8 --
Sorry, as I often do I found a bit more to add - a bad habit I guess (and doing it again now )


Quote:
Originally Posted by Katy Penland
Question for Rasmus and others who have seen lots of this species: Is flat-headedness a typical trait of kelp gulls? In many of the internet photos I ran across, when shot from the side the birds appear to be quite flat-headed.
Yes it is, but personally I obviously wouldn't use that feature alone.

In regards of variation of iris-colour in Kelp Gull: Yes, there appear to be some variation (ie. S. African Kelp's appear to be the ones where dark eyes are most frequent seen; ssp. vetula). However, there are many indications that the various subspecies of the Kelp Gull are invalid and the variation is probably nothing but individual (and, as mentioned previously, depending on light). In any case it is poorly understood at this point.

Last edited by Rasmus Boegh : Saturday 18th September 2004 at 07:47.
Rasmus Boegh is offline  
Reply With Quote
BF Supporter BF Supporter 2008
Click here to Support BirdForum
Old Saturday 18th September 2004, 07:49   #14
Katy Penland
Registered User
 
Katy Penland's Avatar

 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Pine Mountain, California, USA
Posts: 10,641
LOL! When I went to post my earlier response, I did a double-take because I saw the number of URLs in your message had increased. :-) Please don't apologize, it's certainly not a bad habit to be so freely giving of your knowledge. Thanks for all of this info, BTW, it's been very instructive.
Katy Penland is offline  
Reply With Quote
BF Supporter BF Supporter 2004 BF Supporter 2005 BF Supporter 2006 BF Supporter 2007 BF Supporter 2008
Click here to Support BirdForum
Old Saturday 18th September 2004, 13:40   #15
Larry Lade
Moderator
 
Larry Lade's Avatar

 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Saint Joseph, Missouri, USA
Posts: 8,114
Blog Entries: 3
Rasmus, would the red orbital ring be seen on a breeding Kelp, but not on a non-breeding Kelp? That is to say, do Kelp Gulls have this red orbital ring at certain times and not at other times or is it a constant in adult birds?

As I do not have a book on gulls, I am curious what other gulls, similiar to the Kelp, would be found in Argentina?

Perhaps a majority of the "Kelp" gulls found here in the United States might be hybrids with the Herring Gull. Some believe they may be F1 or F2 birds, referring to whether the parent birds were Kelp X Herring (F1) or [Kelp X Herring] X Herring (F2). I assume this is not the case for South American Kelp as Herring Gulls are a more northerly occuring gull. Is this correct?

Thank you to all for their input to this thread!
__________________
Larry
Larry Lade is offline  
Reply With Quote
BF Supporter BF Supporter 2004 BF Supporter 2005 BF Supporter 2006 BF Supporter 2007 BF Supporter 2008 BF Supporter 2009
Click here to Support BirdForum
Old Saturday 18th September 2004, 13:50   #16
Larry Lade
Moderator
 
Larry Lade's Avatar

 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Saint Joseph, Missouri, USA
Posts: 8,114
Blog Entries: 3
More photos of the Missouri Mystery Gull

The webmaster on our Audubon Society of Missouri (ASM) website has posted some additional photos of "our mystery gull".

Rasmus, and others, would you take a look at this website and offer your thoughts on what this "black-backed gull" is? In your estimations, is it a pure Kelp Gull, a hybrid Kelp X ? or perhaps something else. These photos were taken September 16, 2004, at Smithville Lake, Smithville, Missouri.

Here is the website:

http://mobirds.org/SmithvilleGULL.htm
__________________
Larry

Last edited by Larry Lade : Saturday 18th September 2004 at 13:56. Reason: I forgot to include the website location.
Larry Lade is offline  
Reply With Quote
BF Supporter BF Supporter 2004 BF Supporter 2005 BF Supporter 2006 BF Supporter 2007 BF Supporter 2008 BF Supporter 2009
Click here to Support BirdForum
Old Saturday 18th September 2004, 22:53   #17
Rasmus Boegh
BF member
 
Rasmus Boegh's Avatar

 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: right next door
Posts: 3,804
Quote:
Originally Posted by Larry Lade
Rasmus, would the red orbital ring be seen on a breeding Kelp, but not on a non-breeding Kelp? That is to say, do Kelp Gulls have this red orbital ring at certain times and not at other times or is it a constant in adult birds?
No, it is not dependant on breeding or non-breeding. However, as 1st & 2nd year individuals usually lack the red eye-ring competely, this may be a feature some individuals retain for a short period after having moulted into the typical ad. plumage (it is a "four-year-gull").


Quote:
Originally Posted by Larry Lade
As I do not have a book on gulls, I am curious what other gulls, similiar to the Kelp, would be found in Argentina?
There is only one other large dark-backed gull in Argentina: Olrog's Gull (formerly part of Band-tailed). Easily separated by smaller size, obvious tail-band, wing versus tail projection, white tips only on inner remiges and bill colour+shape. To my knowledge there have only been two confirmed records of the LBBG("-group") in South America - one in Venezuela and one from Ecuador. In addition to these there has been a single unconfirmed record from Venezuela and a highly dubious record from Argentina. To my knowledge the Argentian record has not been accepted for obvious reasons. Wing versus tail projection, leg colour (obs: careful!), larger size and "heavier" jizz are all useful for separating Kelp from LBBG. Gull's could perhaps be the only group where ID's generally are easier in South America than in the northern Hemisphere!


Quote:
Originally Posted by Larry Lade
Perhaps a majority of the "Kelp" gulls found here in the United States might be hybrids with the Herring Gull. Some believe they may be F1 or F2 birds, referring to whether the parent birds were Kelp X Herring (F1) or [Kelp X Herring] X Herring (F2). I assume this is not the case for South American Kelp as Herring Gulls are a more northerly occuring gull. Is this correct?
Yes, it certainly wouldn't astonish me if at least a large percentage of the "Kelp's" recorded in the US actually are hybrids. Herring is indeed a north Hemisphere gull; only a small number of records from South America, very few being confirmed. It is probably a casual visitor to Colombia & Venezuela in the far north of the continent. In addition to this there has been a single confirmed record from Peru and likewise from Ecuador.

Last edited by Rasmus Boegh : Saturday 18th September 2004 at 23:11.
Rasmus Boegh is offline  
Reply With Quote
BF Supporter BF Supporter 2008
Click here to Support BirdForum
Old Saturday 18th September 2004, 23:34   #18
Rasmus Boegh
BF member
 
Rasmus Boegh's Avatar

 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: right next door
Posts: 3,804
Quote:
Originally Posted by Larry Lade
The webmaster on our Audubon Society of Missouri (ASM) website has posted some additional photos of "our mystery gull".

Rasmus, and others, would you take a look at this website and offer your thoughts on what this "black-backed gull" is? In your estimations, is it a pure Kelp Gull, a hybrid Kelp X ? or perhaps something else. These photos were taken September 16, 2004, at Smithville Lake, Smithville, Missouri.

Here is the website:

http://mobirds.org/SmithvilleGULL.htm
I have to say it looks somewhat "Kelp Gull-ish" to me. The claims that "pure Kelp's" always have a mantle that is concolor with the black wing-tips is completely wrong. In pure Kelp's (in southern South America) the mantle often - even usually - appear somewhat paler (dark grey-brown) than the black wing-tips when seen in good light. Admittedly, even with this in mind, I must say that the individual on the photos indeed look very pale-mantled for a pure Kelp. However, this is a doubtful feature; judging a differences in hue on a photo...

Have a look at this Kelp from Chile; perched in good light:
http://www.avesdechile.cl/149.htm

Last edited by Rasmus Boegh : Sunday 19th September 2004 at 04:57. Reason: significant mistake
Rasmus Boegh is offline  
Reply With Quote
BF Supporter BF Supporter 2008
Click here to Support BirdForum
Old Sunday 19th September 2004, 01:39   #19
Rasmus Boegh
BF member
 
Rasmus Boegh's Avatar

 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: right next door
Posts: 3,804
Quote:
Originally Posted by Larry Lade
The webmaster on our Audubon Society of Missouri (ASM) website has posted some additional photos of "our mystery gull".

Rasmus, and others, would you take a look at this website and offer your thoughts on what this "black-backed gull" is? In your estimations, is it a pure Kelp Gull, a hybrid Kelp X ? or perhaps something else. These photos were taken September 16, 2004, at Smithville Lake, Smithville, Missouri.

Here is the website:

http://mobirds.org/SmithvilleGULL.htm
Been looking at the "Smithville Gull" again. In Kelp P10 generally is shorter than P9. If looking at the close-up of the wing-tip of the "Smithville Gull" P10 appears to be equal if not very slightly longer than P9:
http://mobirds.org/images/CValentine/back_wingtip_2.jpg
Can't help wondering about LBBG?

Also, I wonder where the white tips of P9 & P8 are? They don't appear to be present, though this isn't a diagnostic feature - just an indication. Finally, the legs appear strikingly bright yellow (because of light?), probably too bright for pure Kelp:
http://mobirds.org/images/CValentine/legs_1.jpg

Last edited by Rasmus Boegh : Monday 20th September 2004 at 16:54.
Rasmus Boegh is offline  
Reply With Quote
BF Supporter BF Supporter 2008
Click here to Support BirdForum
Old Sunday 19th September 2004, 04:05   #20
Larry Lade
Moderator
 
Larry Lade's Avatar

 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Saint Joseph, Missouri, USA
Posts: 8,114
Blog Entries: 3
Rasmus, looking at Sibley's guide, it looks to me like P10 is a little longer than P9 on both the Kelp and the Lesser Black-backed Gull. I realize that these are only drawings so that distinction possibly may not have been made. Do you know of a website which would show a "wing photo" of this shorter P10 on the Kelp Gull?

I would like to see it so I would know what exactly I was looking for should I see a Kelp Gull.
__________________
Larry
Larry Lade is offline  
Reply With Quote
BF Supporter BF Supporter 2004 BF Supporter 2005 BF Supporter 2006 BF Supporter 2007 BF Supporter 2008 BF Supporter 2009
Click here to Support BirdForum
Old Sunday 19th September 2004, 04:13   #21
Larry Lade
Moderator
 
Larry Lade's Avatar

 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Saint Joseph, Missouri, USA
Posts: 8,114
Blog Entries: 3
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rasmus Boegh
Been looking at the "Smithville Gull" again. In Kelp P10 generally is shorter than P9. If looking at the close-up of the wing-tip of the "Smithville Gull" P10 appears to be equal if not very slightly longer than P9:
http://mobirds.org/images/CValentine/back_wingtip_2.jpg

Also, I wonder where the white tips of P9 & P8 are? They don't appear to be present, though this isn't a diagnostic feature - just an indication. Finally, the legs appear strikingly bright yellow (because of light?), perhaps too bright for pure Kelp:
http://mobirds.org/images/CValentine/legs_1.jpg
Rasmus, never mind I went "googling" and found a photo here that shows what you were talking about.

http://www.user.fast.net/~becard/Kelp%20Gull-3.jpg
__________________
Larry
Larry Lade is offline  
Reply With Quote
BF Supporter BF Supporter 2004 BF Supporter 2005 BF Supporter 2006 BF Supporter 2007 BF Supporter 2008 BF Supporter 2009
Click here to Support BirdForum
Old Sunday 19th September 2004, 04:24   #22
Larry Lade
Moderator
 
Larry Lade's Avatar

 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Saint Joseph, Missouri, USA
Posts: 8,114
Blog Entries: 3
Alejandro, I did not mean to "take over" your thread. The "Smithville" gull seemed to be relevant to your thread because there are those who think "our mystery gull" may be a Kelp.

Do you mind if we discuss here? Or do you want me to refer back to the thread which I began, Gull ID? Which is here:

http://www.birdforum.net/showthread.php?t=23134

I apologize for my intrusion.
__________________
Larry

Last edited by Larry Lade : Sunday 19th September 2004 at 04:34.
Larry Lade is offline  
Reply With Quote
BF Supporter BF Supporter 2004 BF Supporter 2005 BF Supporter 2006 BF Supporter 2007 BF Supporter 2008 BF Supporter 2009
Click here to Support BirdForum
Old Monday 20th September 2004, 01:29   #23
BirdsPeru
Alejandro Tabini

 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Lima - Peru
Posts: 760
Larry,

I do not mind if we keep on discusing about the mistery gull on this thread. That's the reason this forums were intended for.

Alejandro
BirdsPeru is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Monday 20th September 2004, 04:36   #24
Larry Lade
Moderator
 
Larry Lade's Avatar

 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Saint Joseph, Missouri, USA
Posts: 8,114
Blog Entries: 3
A group of "top-notch" birders from Missouri and Kansas went to Smithville Lake this morning. Going out on the lake in a boat, they were able to view the "Smithville" gull at close range. The verdict handed down is that the bird is a LESSER BLACK-BACKED GULL.
__________________
Larry
Larry Lade is offline  
Reply With Quote
BF Supporter BF Supporter 2004 BF Supporter 2005 BF Supporter 2006 BF Supporter 2007 BF Supporter 2008 BF Supporter 2009
Click here to Support BirdForum
Old Monday 20th September 2004, 16:53   #25
Rasmus Boegh
BF member
 
Rasmus Boegh's Avatar

 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: right next door
Posts: 3,804
Quote:
Originally Posted by Larry Lade
The verdict handed down is that the bird is a LESSER BLACK-BACKED GULL.
Yes, I was thinking along those lines. My problem was the massive bill - it looks larger than any LBBG I have seen, though it could very well be within the variation.
Rasmus Boegh is offline  
Reply With Quote
BF Supporter BF Supporter 2008
Click here to Support BirdForum
Advertisement
Reply


Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Index for ID Q&A Jane Turner Bird Identification Q&A 99 Friday 25th September 2009 13:53
uk sightings saturday May 3rd 2003 Steve Your Rarities 0 Monday 5th May 2003 11:35
uk sightings Wednesday 16th April 2003 Steve Your Rarities 0 Wednesday 16th April 2003 21:08
UK Sightings - Tuesday 4 February 2003 ralph Your Rarities 0 Tuesday 4th February 2003 10:15
UK Sightings - Saturday 1 February 2003 ralph Your Rarities 1 Sunday 2nd February 2003 17:00

{googleads}
Search the net with ask.com
Help support BirdForum
Ask.com and get

Page generated in 0.32501006 seconds with 36 queries
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:44.