Join for FREE
It only takes a minute!

Welcome to BirdForum.
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community, dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is absolutely FREE! You are most welcome to register for an account, which allows you to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old Wednesday 20th June 2012, 16:44   #1
ammadoux
Registered doux
 
ammadoux's Avatar

 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Jeddah - Saudi Arabia
Posts: 51,845
filter with Lumix 100-300mm

Hello all

when i first started to use the Lumix 100-300mm with the Olympus EPL1, i did not find a UV filter with the right diameter here. so until the one i ordered from amazon i used it without the filter, i have notice it was so fast and give very accurate focus.

when i mounted the filter which is Hoya the speed of focus and the IQ is nothing like it is without it.

i know that may sound strange to many, but i am sure its not me, as i now depend on the live view and the AF of the camera.

so my friends, what do you think.

thanks so much.


__________________
dulce doux
i love BF
flicker blog
ammadoux is online now  
Reply With Quote
BF Supporter 2009 2010 2011 2012
Click here to Support BirdForum
Old Wednesday 20th June 2012, 16:46   #2
Cristian Mihai
Cristian Mihai
 
Cristian Mihai's Avatar

 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Bucharest
Posts: 13,678
Remove the filter.
Cristian Mihai is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Wednesday 20th June 2012, 17:24   #3
njlarsen
Opus Editor
 
njlarsen's Avatar

 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Portsmouth, Dominica
Posts: 12,887
Only extremely good (and therefore expensive) filters should be on a lens when using it. The others do degrade the results. There was a good thread on the m43 forum in DPReview showing that a couple of years ago.

Niels
__________________
Support bird conservation in the Caribbean: SCSCB
njlarsen is online now  
Reply With Quote
BF Supporter 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Click here to Support BirdForum
Old Thursday 21st June 2012, 10:56   #4
iveljay
Registered User

 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Wiltshire, England
Posts: 418
I used to have a full film setup with about 30 lenses - I eventually got rid of all the filters other than special effects as they added considerably to the workload (two more glass surfaces that attracted dust etc.) and also added weight. I never suffered any lens damage as a result.

The only proviso is that if you are shooting in a hostile environment - fine blown sand for instance - then you should use a filter + a sealed slr and lenses, I keep an E-3 slr for that reason. Your EPL-1 is more likely to suffer mechanical damage before the lens surface under those conditions.

I find a good blower brush is vital - microfibre cloths tend to trap abrasive particles so I avoid them.

For my EP-2, it does a maginificent job with no filters but all of its lenses do have lens hoods which helps to keep the fingers off the front elements as well as their intended use against flare.

However, discussions on using hoods, filters etc appear in photo mags and online groups going back many decades so it is clear there is no right answer, only what suits you.

Last edited by iveljay : Thursday 21st June 2012 at 11:18.
iveljay is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Friday 22nd June 2012, 18:05   #5
ammadoux
Registered doux
 
ammadoux's Avatar

 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Jeddah - Saudi Arabia
Posts: 51,845
thanks so much for the replies, enjoyed reading them.

certainly the filter is removed, also thinking of taking it from the Bigma.

never was convinced with filters before, as most of my work when i first started photography 20 years back was still life in home settings, so i did not use a filter with my Zuiko 50/1.2 macro, had one over the zoom lens i use for shooting out doors, but at the time of film photography the IQ was dominated by the quality of the film.

thanks also for the advise about the effect of dust on the mirror-less EPL1, that means i have to keep it home at the days of dust storms.

thanks again.
__________________
dulce doux
i love BF
flicker blog
ammadoux is online now  
Reply With Quote
BF Supporter 2009 2010 2011 2012
Click here to Support BirdForum
Advertisement
Reply


Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Canon 100-400 uv filter? BackGardenMoths Canon 25 Sunday 10th June 2012 10:23
Sigma 100-300mm f/4 billsbirding Sigma & Other Third Party Lenses 3 Tuesday 22nd May 2012 11:10
Panasonic Lumix G Vario 100-300mm F4-5.6 OIS on Olympus PEN body? Hor Kee Olympus 2 Tuesday 9th August 2011 00:44
Lumix FZ-100 firstreesjohn Panasonic 9 Monday 7th February 2011 06:35


Fatbirder's Top 1000 Birding Websites

Search the net with ask.com
Help support BirdForum
Ask.com and get

Page generated in 0.19179511 seconds with 14 queries
All times are GMT. The time now is 18:29.