Join for FREE
It only takes a minute!

Welcome to BirdForum.
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community, dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is absolutely FREE! You are most welcome to register for an account, which allows you to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old Friday 15th April 2005, 13:52   #1
Marley
Registered User

 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 136
Question Optical Quality of Pre-Owned Zeiss Bins

Hello all,

I have been searching the forum for Zeiss information and I see quite a bit of good information regarding FL quality, etc.

I am interested in Zeiss bins, but after just purchasing a pair of Swaro 8.5 x 42 ELs, the finances are a bit strained.

I see many pairs of pre-owned Zeiss bins on E-Bay at pretty good discounts, but I know very little about their optical quality. We all know that Zeiss is reknown for it's excellent glass, but at least for me, far less is known about the individual years and models.

I am kind of a nut about clarity and sharpness and am less worried about CA and slight fuzzyness at the edge of the field of view. I like 42 mm objectives and would appreciate any opinions on 7,8 or 10x magnification.

Thanks to all in advance,

Rgds,

Steffan


Marley is offline  
Reply With Quote
BF Supporter 2005 2006 2007 2008
Click here to Support BirdForum
Old Friday 15th April 2005, 15:38   #2
IanF
Moderator
 
IanF's Avatar

 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Billingham, NE England
Posts: 55,449
Maybe not too relevant to your query but I have had a pair of Carl Zeiss 8x32 DDR Jenoptems for around 30 years and they are as good as new. No marks on the objectives and the bloom is still perfect. The clairty is very good and they have out lasted several other pairs. I'd still be using them now if they had fold down eyecups as nowadays I wear spectacles. My wife loves them though for thier light weight and clarity - so now they're hers!
IanF is offline  
Reply With Quote
BF Supporter 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Click here to Support BirdForum
Old Friday 15th April 2005, 16:45   #3
Andrew Rowlands
Registered User
 
Andrew Rowlands's Avatar

 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Wales.
Posts: 5,889
Hi Steffan,

The recently discontinued (I think) 7x42 Dialyts would be top of my list, they were made for a very long time and the coatings are better on the later versions. You have to try them!

Cheers,

Andy.
Andrew Rowlands is offline  
Reply With Quote
BF Supporter 2004 2005 2006
Click here to Support BirdForum
Old Saturday 16th April 2005, 19:12   #4
henry link
Registered User

 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: north carolina
Posts: 2,931
Steffan,

A few things to keep in mind when looking at old Zeiss bins on eBay. The division of Germany after WWII resulted in the creation of two "Zeiss" firms: Carl Zeiss Jena in East Germany and Carl Zeiss in Oberkochen, West Germany. CZJ made mostly inexpensive and often crudely constructed binoculars based on pre-war designs (with a few notable exceptions which are now highly prized by collectors). Zeiss Oberkochen produced innovative and expensive porro designs and after acquiring the Hensoldt firm added roof prism binoculars. Both porro and roof were beautifully made, but the non-phase corrected roofs (Dialyts) made before 1989 are IMO much inferior to the same models produced after the introduction of phase coating that year.

EBay is definitely a "buyer beware" market for binoculars. In my experience the sellers usually don't know enough to accurately describe the condition of older binoculars so I almost always assume reconditioning will be necessary and am pleasantly surprised if it isn't. CZJ's should almost never be very expensive.

Henry

Last edited by henry link : Wednesday 20th April 2005 at 20:12.
henry link is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Wednesday 20th April 2005, 11:07   #5
Rich N
Registered User

 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: California
Posts: 237
If you are going to look for a used Zeiss binocular you may as well look for a used FL.

I suggest waiting until you can buy a new one where you have the opportunity to return or exchange it if there is a problem with that particular unit.

Rich
Rich N is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Wednesday 20th April 2005, 11:47   #6
POP
Registered Member
 
POP's Avatar

 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: uk
Posts: 1,580
Henry am I right in that I beleive the East German binocular was marketed with a brand name of Jenoptem?
POP
POP is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Wednesday 20th April 2005, 14:34   #7
henry link
Registered User

 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: north carolina
Posts: 2,931
POP,

Somebody else probably knows more about the history of the Jenoptem models. When Zeiss-Jena first came to my attention in the mid 80's the Jenoptem 8X30, 7X50 and 10X50 were slightly less expensive versions of the identical looking 8X30 Deltrintem, 7X50 Binoctem and 10X50 Dekarem. At the time I was told that the non-Jenoptems had better internal construction and "selected" optics. More recently I read that the Jenoptems were in fact completely identical, but used more modern manufacturing techniques that made them cheaper to produce. The name "Carl Zeiss" could not be used by CZJ in the US and some other countries. Here the brand name "aus Jena" was used.

Henry

Last edited by henry link : Wednesday 20th April 2005 at 14:40.
henry link is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Wednesday 20th April 2005, 14:45   #8
POP
Registered Member
 
POP's Avatar

 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: uk
Posts: 1,580
thank you Henry.

POP
POP is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Wednesday 20th April 2005, 20:01   #9
chartwell99
Registered User

 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: houston, texas, usa
Posts: 516
Zeiss Oberkochen produced innovative and expensive porro designs and after acquiring the Hensoldt firm added roof prism binoculars.
Henry[/quote]

Actually, Carl Zeiss had acquired a majority interest in Hensoldt during the 1920's. Hensoldt, interestingly enough, developed the abbe-koenig roof prism at the turn of the last century to avoid patent infringement issues with the early Zeiss porro designs, and named their roof glasses "Dialyt". Zeiss transferred all binocular production from Oberkochen to the Hensoldt facilities in Wetzlar in early 1960's, and used the Dialyt name for their roof prism models, although the prisms used were initially Schmidt-Pechan. The renowned 7 x 42, however, while also a Dialyt model, was an abbe-koenig design, as are the 42mm FLs today. To my knowledge, all Zeiss Jena roof prism models were Schmidt-Pechan designs, and all were made in Eisfeld, East Germany.
chartwell99 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Wednesday 20th April 2005, 20:39   #10
henry link
Registered User

 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: north carolina
Posts: 2,931
chartwell99,

Thanks for the correction about the Zeiss-Hensoldt connection.

Henry
henry link is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Monday 25th April 2005, 13:01   #11
trealawboy
Registered User
 
trealawboy's Avatar

 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Here
Posts: 398
See the Binoculars Corner section at

http://www.holgermerlitz.de

for some interesting information about about older binoculars, particularly Zeiss.
__________________
Trealaw Boy
trealawboy is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Wednesday 27th April 2005, 19:33   #12
Chhayanat
Registered User

 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Dublin
Posts: 141
Quote:
Originally Posted by IanF
Maybe not too relevant to your query but I have had a pair of Carl Zeiss 8x32 DDR Jenoptems for around 30 years and they are as good as new. No marks on the objectives and the bloom is still perfect. The clairty is very good and they have out lasted several other pairs. I'd still be using them now if they had fold down eyecups as nowadays I wear spectacles. My wife loves them though for thier light weight and clarity - so now they're hers!
In all likelihood you have 8x30 Jenoptem porro prisms as there was never a Jenoptem 8x32 and the 8x32 Notarem roof prisms appeared just inside of 30 years. Only the Notarems had fold down eyecups. If this has been answered already I regret the repetition.
Chhayanat is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Wednesday 27th April 2005, 19:56   #13
IanF
Moderator
 
IanF's Avatar

 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Billingham, NE England
Posts: 55,449
My apologies they are 8x30W.
IanF is offline  
Reply With Quote
BF Supporter 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Click here to Support BirdForum
Old Wednesday 27th April 2005, 20:33   #14
Pinewood
New York correspondent

 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: New York, USA
Posts: 2,169
Marley,

Ebay is often a source of "gray market" Zeiss binoculars. If the binocular was imported by Zeiss USA, there is a transferable guarantee. If you can obtain the serial number, before purchase, check with Zeiss USA to ascertain if it is covered by that guarantee.
Additionally, the Dialyts should be a T*, or phase coated model.

Happy bird watching,
Arthur Pinewood
Pinewood is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sunday 3rd September 2006, 16:14   #15
MacGee
Registered User

 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Bridge of Allan
Posts: 1,004
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pinewood
Marley,
Ebay is often a source of "gray market" Zeiss binoculars.
Also, a lot of the Jenoptems sold on eBay in the UK were made, not in East Germany but Japan. They began as knock-offs, but were of good quality optically, so CZJ did a deal with the Japanese makers and made them legitimate. But they're of poorer quality mechanically and in construction.

Michael.
MacGee is offline  
Reply With Quote
Advertisement
Reply


Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Comparison of 65mm Scopes: Zeiss vs. Swarovski aomcm Spotting Scopes & tripod/heads 2 Thursday 2nd March 2006 20:40
I just bought my first quality bins! Pentax DCF WP 10X50 Windlord Pentax 1 Monday 22nd November 2004 21:15
Quest for new bins, and a comment on the edge sharpness of the FLs razor6 Binoculars 2 Monday 4th October 2004 04:51
The influence of filters on optical quality Hermann Spotting Scopes & tripod/heads 9 Monday 5th July 2004 21:28
can optical quality be improved? tomreid24 Binoculars 22 Saturday 27th December 2003 22:07

{googleads}
Fatbirder's Top 1000 Birding Websites

Search the net with ask.com
Help support BirdForum
Ask.com and get

Page generated in 0.20860291 seconds with 24 queries
All times are GMT. The time now is 09:22.