Join for FREE
It only takes a minute!

Welcome to BirdForum.
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community, dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is absolutely FREE! You are most welcome to register for an account, which allows you to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old Friday 3rd June 2005, 22:02   #1
jonafly
Registered User
 
jonafly's Avatar

 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: holland
Posts: 616
Two spanish larks

Boomleeuwerik.jpg
Saw this last month in Spain in the Ebro Delta. As far as I can tell this is Lullula arborea, but I'm not sure. Can anyone confirm this?


veldleeuwerik_juv.jpg
Is this a juvenile Alauda arvensis? Ebro Delta last month.


Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Boomleeuwerik.jpg
Views:	176
Size:	79.4 KB
ID:	22611  Click image for larger version

Name:	veldleeuwerik_juv.jpg
Views:	170
Size:	108.9 KB
ID:	22612  
__________________
André Jas, Rebhuhnweg 7, 49828 Georgsdorf, Germany
jonafly is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Friday 3rd June 2005, 22:12   #2
Julian Sykes Wildlife
Jules Sykes
 
Julian Sykes Wildlife's Avatar

 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Valencia
Posts: 793
Hello Jon
I think you could be right with these but the video-grabs are not the best.
Julian Sykes Wildlife is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Friday 3rd June 2005, 22:31   #3
jonafly
Registered User
 
jonafly's Avatar

 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: holland
Posts: 616
Yeah, it's always the poor shots that I can't really figure out. Just the way it is.
__________________
André Jas, Rebhuhnweg 7, 49828 Georgsdorf, Germany
jonafly is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Saturday 4th June 2005, 08:45   #4
Ghostly Vision
Registered User

 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: England
Posts: 2,482
André,

The first series certainly look like arborea - on the second-from right pic, where the bird is taking off, the white on the primary coverts can be seen.

The other pic could well be aervensis, but may also be a Thekla/Crested type - too difficult to tell from the grabs.

GV
Ghostly Vision is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Saturday 4th June 2005, 14:16   #5
jonafly
Registered User
 
jonafly's Avatar

 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: holland
Posts: 616
I think crested can be ruled out, Ghostly. There was no crest whatsoever (in my recollection), and I think even a completely flattened crest I would've seen. So leaves arvensis and theklae.
__________________
André Jas, Rebhuhnweg 7, 49828 Georgsdorf, Germany
jonafly is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Saturday 4th June 2005, 16:08   #6
Jane Turner
Registered User
 
Jane Turner's Avatar

 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Hoylake, Merseyside
Posts: 19,815
I think the second bird looks more like a very juv Crestie/Thekla as opposed to Skylark too - though no way can you ever be sure.. Simple observation in the field of the colour of the outer tail feathers and whether or not there was a white trailing edge to the secondaries would have told you though.
__________________
If I'm not online I'm probably here!
Last Cheshire Lesser Scaup (301) last Red Rocks Grey Partridge (250), last Garden Avocet (202), last Self-found Great White Egret (293)
Jane Turner is online now  
Reply With Quote
BF Supporter 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Click here to Support BirdForum
Old Saturday 4th June 2005, 17:33   #7
jonafly
Registered User
 
jonafly's Avatar

 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: holland
Posts: 616
It's always the dilemma: do I first use my binoculars or my videocamera. If I use binocs first I often fail to grab it on film and as in this case I got it on film but failed to make out the right species. What can you do?
__________________
André Jas, Rebhuhnweg 7, 49828 Georgsdorf, Germany
jonafly is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Saturday 4th June 2005, 20:27   #8
lou salomon
the birdonist
 
lou salomon's Avatar

 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Stuttgart
Posts: 8,911
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jane Turner
I think the second bird looks more like a very juv Crestie/Thekla as opposed to Skylark too - though no way can you ever be sure.. Simple observation in the field of the colour of the outer tail feathers and whether or not there was a white trailing edge to the secondaries would have told you though.
this is my feeling too (crested/theklae). i'd prefer thekla lark just because it sits on top of some herbs which i haven't seen in crested yet.
__________________
lou
lou salomon is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old Saturday 4th June 2005, 23:06   #9
Jane Turner
Registered User
 
Jane Turner's Avatar

 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Hoylake, Merseyside
Posts: 19,815
Quote:
Originally Posted by jonafly
It's always the dilemma: do I first use my binoculars or my videocamera. If I use binocs first I often fail to grab it on film and as in this case I got it on film but failed to make out the right species. What can you do?
Well withut wanting to sound patronising, can I advocate going for the binoculars and taking notes as your first reaction. That way you will identify a whole lot more for yourself.
__________________
If I'm not online I'm probably here!
Last Cheshire Lesser Scaup (301) last Red Rocks Grey Partridge (250), last Garden Avocet (202), last Self-found Great White Egret (293)
Jane Turner is online now  
Reply With Quote
BF Supporter 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Click here to Support BirdForum
Old Saturday 4th June 2005, 23:10   #10
Edward woodwood
Member

 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 11,309
wise words Jane

as it is, that bird will remain unidentified...

as Jane says, a few careful observations in the field should enable an identification to be made... or certainy make the photo a bit easier

Tim
Edward woodwood is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Saturday 4th June 2005, 23:11   #11
Jane Turner
Registered User
 
Jane Turner's Avatar

 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Hoylake, Merseyside
Posts: 19,815
Actually I think I can see rufous outer tail in the left hand of the set which rules out Skylark!
__________________
If I'm not online I'm probably here!
Last Cheshire Lesser Scaup (301) last Red Rocks Grey Partridge (250), last Garden Avocet (202), last Self-found Great White Egret (293)
Jane Turner is online now  
Reply With Quote
BF Supporter 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Click here to Support BirdForum
Old Sunday 5th June 2005, 10:23   #12
jonafly
Registered User
 
jonafly's Avatar

 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: holland
Posts: 616
I'll label it as theklae then. Thank you all for help and suggestions.

André
__________________
André Jas, Rebhuhnweg 7, 49828 Georgsdorf, Germany
jonafly is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sunday 5th June 2005, 16:13   #13
Julian Sykes Wildlife
Jules Sykes
 
Julian Sykes Wildlife's Avatar

 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Valencia
Posts: 793
Quote:
Originally Posted by jonafly
I'll label it as theklae then. Thank you all for help and suggestions.

André
I have heard it all now
Julian Sykes Wildlife is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sunday 5th June 2005, 16:16   #14
Edward woodwood
Member

 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 11,309
Edward woodwood is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sunday 5th June 2005, 22:40   #15
Jane Turner
Registered User
 
Jane Turner's Avatar

 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Hoylake, Merseyside
Posts: 19,815
Quote:
Originally Posted by jonafly
I'll label it as theklae then. Thank you all for help and suggestions.

André
Andre - you can label it as not Skylark, but more than that is pure fantasy I am afraid.
__________________
If I'm not online I'm probably here!
Last Cheshire Lesser Scaup (301) last Red Rocks Grey Partridge (250), last Garden Avocet (202), last Self-found Great White Egret (293)
Jane Turner is online now  
Reply With Quote
BF Supporter 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Click here to Support BirdForum
Old Monday 6th June 2005, 08:51   #16
Ghostly Vision
Registered User

 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: England
Posts: 2,482
I think that some of you are being a bit harsh on Andre here

Taking field notes from brief observations does require one to know which bits of each bird are important. Looking at a lark, one may start at the head, crest, breast streaks, leg and bill colour etc. By the time it has flown the outer tail feather , trailing edge to the wings, shape of the bill, etc, might all have been missed, still giving no i.d.

So, the extra advice is study the books for the difficult ones so you know where to start looking, check those features quickly, and then video it for confirmation if you are still stuck.

I do agree, the bird is Crested/Thekla, but not identifiable from the pics.

The shape of the lower mandible is diagnostic, though, isn't it? Convex or concave (though still can't quite see form the pics).

Cheers

GV

Last edited by Ghostly Vision : Monday 6th June 2005 at 08:55.
Ghostly Vision is offline  
Reply With Quote
Advertisement
Reply


Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A week in Portugal. 26/4/2005 - 2/5/2005 john-henry Vacational Trip Reports 16 Saturday 28th May 2005 21:38
Spanish Tour brianfm Vacational Trip Reports 10 Monday 9th May 2005 10:42
MapMate/MapaAmigo - my pc's speaking in Spanish!!! Cuckoo-shrike Computers, Birding Software And The Internet 4 Monday 7th March 2005 20:53
Range expansion of Spanish Sparrow into NE Italy foxsparrow Birds & Birding 1 Thursday 17th June 2004 10:59
Spanish Atlantic Coast tchagra Your Birding Day 0 Saturday 23rd August 2003 09:13

{googleads}
Fatbirder's Top 1000 Birding Websites

Search the net with ask.com
Help support BirdForum
Ask.com and get

Page generated in 0.19204211 seconds with 26 queries
All times are GMT. The time now is 10:24.