|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: WV
Posts: 62
|
Zeiss Conquest binoculars
Does anyone have any experience with or opinions about the new Zeiss Conquest 8x40 T* ABK or the 10x40 T* ABK binoculars?
How do they compare to Leica and Swarovski glass? Do they perform well in low-light/twilight conditions? Thanks in advance. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: California
Posts: 1
|
Hello to Stud Duck and All Bird Forum Members--
I am a brand-new member of BF and very happy to be among you! Just purchased a few days ago the new Zeiss Conquest 8x40 B T binoculars. What attracted me to these the most is the Zeiss name plus a substantially lower price than their FL line of bins. These new Conquests--which came out just last month, I believe--have an MSRP of about $1200. These new bins simply "felt right" in my hands when I first picked them up. At 29 ozs., they feel very well balanced. I handled both the 10X and 8X models and opted for the 8X as perhaps being more versatile overall for multiple uses. So far, I have been very pleased with the Conquest 8x40 bins. Clarity, field of view, and focusing are all first rate. I wanted a set of bins that were a cut above a middle price range but not as expensive as a new Leica or Swarovski (or Zeiss FL). I had looked through and considered the Leica Trinovid 8x32, which I thought had an outstanding view, but I liked the looks and feel of the new Zeiss Conquest model enough that I decided to be a "trailblazer" of sorts and took the plunge. Sorry, Stud Duck, I can't compare the new Zeiss to other Leicas/Swarovskis, since I don't have that experience. I haven't yet used these new Zeiss bins in twilight, etc., so I can't give you an opinion about that. I am aware of such things as collimation, chromatic aberration, e.g., but I am still a novice and can't give you a blow-by-blow analysis--not yet, anyway. But I thought you would like to know that someone has indeed purchased the new Zeiss Conquest model. No doubt I am among the first in the U.S. More info. posted later, as I become more familiar with these bins. Again, I'm delighted to be here on the Bird Forum. Jeffer |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Larus marinus
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: St. Paul/Milwaukee
Posts: 543
|
I would say they are good binoculars with one caveat. They are a tad overpriced, more like an expensive mid-priced binocular than a n inexpensive hig-end binocular. One can usally find Nikon LXLs in that price range and they are superior. The Nikon is up there with the Swaros Leicas and FL in many peoples books, the conquests are not.
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: WV
Posts: 62
|
Thanks Robert. Jeffer, keep me posted on how you like your new bins.
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2005
Location: So. CA
Posts: 52
|
CA in Conquests?
How much CA do you see in the new full size Conquests? Are they similar to the Victory series, or are they different? |
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,121
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: East Westfalia
Posts: 3
|
Hello to all Birdforum Members!
I´m also interested in buying a Zeiss Conquest 8x40. In a german forum I found a few comments on the new conquests written by owners. Because I think that your german is not that good here is a summary: 1. the 8x40 seems to be a good deal. The contour sharpness not as good as the Victory´s, but it´s perfect in the center. No visible collimation. 2. the conquest 8x40 is not a "dowstripped" old Victory 8x40, it seems to be completely new constructed. There are to many differences (fov, weight, ...). Again - it´s nice to be here on the birdforum Matthias Forsthövel Last edited by Andrew Rowlands : Tuesday 4th October 2005 at 16:25. Reason: Removing URL. |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Wales.
Posts: 5,889
|
Hi Matthias, Welcome to Birdforum, from all the moderators and staff here!
I hope you enjoy participating here! Cheers, Andy. |
|
|
Click here to Support BirdForum |
|
|
#9 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 26
|
The Nikon LXs
I tried some LXes in 8x the other day at my local scope city. they were not that bright and kind of looked foggy. Perhaps it was because i used them after the Leica Ultravids? Still i was somewhat disappointed after reading all the great things about the Nikon high end models.
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Grand Rapids, MI USA
Posts: 9
|
Welcome to Bird Forum, Jeffer
Quote:
Welcome to Bird Forum, Jeffer, and congrats on your new bins. You should get many years of excellent birding with them, as Zeiss makes excellent products. It's too bad that as a new member you rather innocently stepped into a gaggle of technogeeks who can be very opinionated about equipment, and at the same time somewhat hamhanded about expressing their opinions. Seems to me you did what any reasonable person should do in selecting equipment. You figured out how much you could reasonably spend, then went to a shop and tried out a number of options and selected what felt best to you. Everyone's eyes and face are different and therefore different equipment is appropriate for different folks. The objective here is not to get so enamoured of the equipment that it's about equipment instead of birds. Rather the objective is to comfortably extend your ability to clearly see birds. In fact the best equipment for you is that which sort of disappears because it so naturally and comfortably extends your range of vision. So, again, welcome. Enjoy yourself in the field, and don't worry much about the opinions of the technogeeks. Hope you are still delighted to be among us. NedZ |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | ||
|
Steve Campsall
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Leicestershire, UK
Posts: 6,273
|
Quote:
Quote:
Verdict: Optically excellent and lightest in this class, but over-styling affects comfort and balance. OPTICAL: 9 / 10 DESIGN AND EASE OF USE: 7.5 / 10 VALUE FOR MONEY: 9.5 / 10
__________________
Steve "...when the cities lie at the monster’s feet there are left the mountains." Robinson Jeffers, "Shine, Perishing Republic"
Last edited by scampo : Sunday 9th October 2005 at 17:35. |
||
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: California
Posts: 178
|
The Conquest 8x40 ABK and 10x40 ABK are the first bins in the Conquest line to use Abbe-Koenig prisms. This plus the T* coatings ought to give them a low-light performance rivaling most 8x50/10x50 roofs. Since they don't use Fl glass they should have slightly more chromatic aberation than the Zeiss Fl's but similar brightness. I look forward to reading some hands-on impressions.
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Make Time to Stop and Look Once Again
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Southern CA
Posts: 11
|
I wonder how they would compare to the Zeiss Victory 8X40 or 10X40.
|
|
|
| Advertisement |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Comparison of 65mm Scopes: Zeiss vs. Swarovski | aomcm | Spotting Scopes & tripod/heads | 2 | Thursday 2nd March 2006 20:40 |
| Nikon 8x32 HG vs Zeiss Conquest 8x30 vs Swarovski 8x30 SCL | DavidT | Nikon | 4 | Friday 26th August 2005 18:55 |
| New Zeiss Victory FL binoculars | Leif | Zeiss | 613 | Wednesday 1st December 2004 01:51 |