Welcome, Guest.
CLICK HERE TO REGISTER


Welcome to BirdForum.
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community, dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is absolutely FREE! You are most welcome to register for an account, which allows you to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old Tuesday 22nd April 2003, 15:29   #1
Richard
Registered User

 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Nottingham, UK
Posts: 160
Best method for quick closeish shots?

Dear All,

I would like to hear some views on taking quick and quite close pics please.

I have a Nikon 4500 and this is my first Spring season with it. I am struggling to get pictures of migrants and butterflies ie things that are often quite close and move about quickly. I use a Cheang adaptor and can set my scope up within seconds. However, sometimes that is too long and often, even with the x20-60 scope eyepiece at x20 I am too close to get a well proportioned picture. I have an Eagle Eye x5 zoom but find it hard to point in the correct direction and get enough light.

I see my options as

1) getting a Nikon x3 teleconverter. I assume there will be little or no vignetting and that the loss of light will be more favourable than the Eagle Eye x5. Can anyone confirm these assumptions?

2) by a digital SLR. I really like using SLRs and have not settled to the LCD yet. Does anyone use a digital SLR with a 300-350 telephoto lens? If so which camera please - know this option will be expensive. I would still use my 4500 for digiscoping.

3) get a digital video camera so that I could more easily follow the bird or butterfly, both in bushes and in flight. I have seen some good videograbs but know little about the camera or software needed. What kind of resolution do they give? Enough to allow good quality 6x4 prints? Roughly how much would an appropriate video camera cost.

Comments gratefully received.

Richard Rogers

Richard is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Tuesday 22nd April 2003, 17:19   #2
Glen Tepke
Senior Member
 
Glen Tepke's Avatar

 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Oakland, California, USA
Posts: 1,306
I have experience only with option #1. The Nikon 3X teleconverter does suffer from vignetting; I have to zoom in about half way with my CP995; to eliminate it; I assume the 4500 would be the same. Also it blocks the viewfinder so you have to use the LCD for finding the bird, which can be very difficult. But it is very bright and sharp and I have had some success with it shooting flying seabirds on pelagic trips, but have not really tried it with small, close birds. Glen
__________________
Photo Gallery
Glen Tepke is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Tuesday 22nd April 2003, 19:23   #3
stevo
Registered User
 
stevo's Avatar

 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: hampshire england
Posts: 1,562
If your looking to take pictures of birds that are guite close it might be worth investing in Eagleeye`s new digiscoping eyepiece,which is designed for getting a well proportioned image of birds that are fairly close(this eyepiece should help with vignetting to).If your looking to take images of butterflies try the MACRO mode on your CP4500 as I believe you can get down to about 2cm.What scope are you using?Hope this info helps.
stevo is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Tuesday 22nd April 2003, 19:39   #4
Richard
Registered User

 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Nottingham, UK
Posts: 160
Glen, thank you for your comments. They have been noted!

Stevo, thanks, I have a Leica scope with a reasonably close focus considering, I need an additional lens for butterflies as they fly off if you get too close (so macro setting no good) and I'm not sure what you mean by "Eagleeye`s new digiscoping eyepiece" - do you mean their x5 teleconverter (which I already have)

Richard
Richard is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Tuesday 22nd April 2003, 19:47   #5
Andy Bright
2nd in command
 
Andy Bright's Avatar

 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Herts
Posts: 6,485
You may be better off getting another digital but with a heftier lens.... maybe a Nikon 5700 or one of the Olymous camera's with 400mm + (presuming you are loaded with money) . I still find that 400mm isn't much when it comes to small Passerines, certainly if printing is your thing.
I don't remember excessive vignetting with my old TC3-ED teleconverter on my cp990 (and that was only a 3x optical zoom camera), the newer cp995 and 4500 go slightly more wide-angle but shouldn't be too bad.
Andy
__________________
www.Digiscoped.com
also, if you're particularly bored, try www.andybright.com - mediocre aviation photography
Andy Bright is offline  
Reply With Quote
BF Supporter BF Supporter 2004 BF Supporter 2005 BF Supporter 2006 BF Supporter 2007 BF Supporter 2008 BF Supporter 2009
Click here to Support BirdForum
Old Tuesday 22nd April 2003, 22:47   #6
Ragna
Registered User
 
Ragna's Avatar

 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Ashtead, Surrey
Posts: 2,055
Richard
Question 2: you cant get used to the LED screen; not many of us can,I along with most on here use a Extenda view x2 which fits over the screen and you use it just like a slr camera,it does pixelate the image aa bit but you soon get used to this. Hope this helps
__________________
graham
Ragna is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Wednesday 23rd April 2003, 02:45   #7
Paulyoly
Senior Member
 
Paulyoly's Avatar

 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Florida
Posts: 252
Quote:
Originally posted by Richard
G "Eagleeye`s new digiscoping eyepiece" - do you mean their x5 teleconverter (which I already have)

Richard
He means they make a fixed eyepiece for your leica scope that has a lower magnification than the 32x that leica offers, it's designed for digiscoping and i believe it threads directly to the 28mm threads of the nikon cameras. i find i can focus fairly close using the macro mode of the camera with my pentax 18x eyepiece, closer than the claimed 19 feet by pentax, the scope is out of focus to the eye, but the camera can still compensate and i get a good pic. Is your problem to much magnification, to slow a shutter speed? I took great butterfly pics with my 3x Oly c3020 by simply sitting at a nice looking flower that the butterfly was on and waiting, eventually they came back and ignored my presence.
Paulyoly is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Wednesday 23rd April 2003, 07:06   #8
IanF
Moderator
 
IanF's Avatar

 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Billingham, NE England
Posts: 40,127
For the butterflies I find the Nikon 4500 macro mode, whilst pretty good, requires you to have to get far too close to them to get a decent sized image. I've started using the Olympus B300 attached which enables a little more distance between you and the camera without noticeable loss in quality of image. I dare say the TC3-ED would have the same effect only more so.
IanF is offline  
Reply With Quote
BF Supporter BF Supporter 2004 BF Supporter 2005 BF Supporter 2006 BF Supporter 2007 BF Supporter 2008 BF Supporter 2009
Click here to Support BirdForum
Old Wednesday 23rd April 2003, 11:30   #9
Dave Smith
Registered User
 
Dave Smith's Avatar

 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Maldon, Essex
Posts: 380
I find that I can get close enough to butterflies provided the camera is held at arms length. The attached photo is one I took on Monday with my CP880 on full zoom (only 2.5) and macro mode. The image is not cropped (only reduced in size).
I have recently aquired a 3x teleconvertor which I haven't tried on a butterfly yet, but seems to still need to be fairly close. If you are close to the butterfly there is more flexibility in deciding the angle of the shot.
If you digiscope a butterfly your only choice of angle is more or less horizontal unless you climb a tree.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	full peacock 4928.jpg
Views:	262
Size:	73.4 KB
ID:	1406  
__________________
Dave
Dave Smith is offline  
Reply With Quote
BF Supporter BF Supporter 2004 BF Supporter 2005 BF Supporter 2006
Click here to Support BirdForum
Old Wednesday 23rd April 2003, 14:49   #10
Richard
Registered User

 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Nottingham, UK
Posts: 160
Thanks to all for your comments

Ragna, I am sure you are right about the LCD screen, I have made a LCD viewing aid myself but it is bulky, I will get the Eagle Eye UK one - it seems expensive for what it is but if I can use the 4500 more like an SLR it will be worth it.

Andy, I have just looked at the Nikon 5700 - I hadn't realised the cost of the top end cameras, they are not an option.

Paulyoly, thanks, I realise what Stevo means now. The fixed eye piece sounds good but I could not easily use it with Cheang's adapter.

Dave, good idea - I will try holding the camera at arms length (but not with the Extenda View!) and see how I get on.

Richard
Richard is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Wednesday 23rd April 2003, 21:57   #11
digi-birder
 
digi-birder's Avatar

 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: South Yorkshire, UK
Posts: 3,288
Quote:
Originally posted by Richard
I have made a LCD viewing aid myself but it is bulky, I will get the Eagle Eye UK one - it seems expensive for what it is but if I can use the 4500 more like an SLR it will be worth it.
You might be as well looking at:

http://www.photosolve.com

as recommended to me on this forum a few weeks ago. They have the Xtend-a-View at a much cheaper price than buying it from EagleEye UK, even taking postage from the US into account.

I am awaiting the arrival of mine this week, as well as the 5X zoom lens.
__________________
Diane.

My second favorite household chore is ironing. My first being, hitting my head on the top bunk bed until I faint. Erma Bombeck
digi-birder is offline  
Reply With Quote
Advertisement
Reply


Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

{googleads}
Search the net with ask.com
Help support BirdForum
Ask.com and get

Page generated in 0.16693497 seconds with 21 queries
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:20.