Join for FREE
It only takes a minute!

Welcome to BirdForum.
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community, dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is absolutely FREE! You are most welcome to register for an account, which allows you to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 2 votes, 3.50 average.
Old Wednesday 23rd April 2003, 22:01   #1
paula
Registered User
 
paula's Avatar

 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Devon UK
Posts: 305
Pied Wagtail through double glazing

This wagtail suddenly landed on the patio while I had the camera in my hands as a heron had just landed by the pond.
I liked the way the wagtail was posing and seemingly looking at me.
Camera setting......ready for heron by pond!:

Camera Model: Canon EOS D60
Date/Time: 2003.04.10 14:18:52
Shutter speed: 1/640 sec
Aperture: 8.0
Exposure mode: Av
Flash: Off
Metering mode: Partial
Drive mode: Continuous
ISO: 400
Lens: 100.0 to 400.0 mm
Focal length: 340.0mm
Subject distance: 5.80 m
AF mode: AI Servo AF


Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	wagtail.jpg
Views:	338
Size:	34.7 KB
ID:	1411  
__________________
paula
http://www.wildlifeandphoto.net
paula is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Friday 25th April 2003, 03:20   #2
IanF
Moderator
 
IanF's Avatar

 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Billingham, NE England
Posts: 55,449
I really like this shot Paula for the composition and colours.

Everything for me just feels right about it. The Wagtail is in a super pose, you've left loads of room for it to look into. Depth of field is just right, covering the grass underfoot nicely and then blurring for the background, which is uncluttered and nice shades of green and brown.

I like the position of the brid across the photo. I think I'd be inclined to have left a shade more room at the bottom of the photo, but head room looks fine.

Exposure wise, a little of the detail is lost in the highlights down the right side of the bird and on the end of the tail, but as the head is so sharp, it doesn't detract from the shot.

I'd give this one 3 stars.

BTW I removed the other comments posted as this is the critque forum. They were more appropriate on the copy that you placed in the Gallery.
IanF is offline  
Reply With Quote
BF Supporter 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Click here to Support BirdForum
Old Friday 25th April 2003, 09:56   #3
paula
Registered User
 
paula's Avatar

 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Devon UK
Posts: 305
Blown highlights

Thank you for your comments and the stars! Ian.
I have taken note of your suggestions.
How would one make sure that highlights are not blown? Should I have compensated one stop down? I.e less light, either a faster shutter speed or smaller f.stop? or -1 on compensation dial?
Btw, I really like this image critique forum and hope it takes off with other members. It sure is the way to learn and improve on one's photographic skills.
__________________
paula
http://www.wildlifeandphoto.net

Last edited by paula : Friday 25th April 2003 at 11:01.
paula is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Friday 25th April 2003, 12:47   #4
IanF
Moderator
 
IanF's Avatar

 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Billingham, NE England
Posts: 55,449
Hi Paula,

When taking a photo I usually try to take the exposure reading from the brightest part of the bird. In strong sunlight, this can lead to the rest of the subject being too dark. Bright overcast days are usualy better than sunny ones. You can bracket exposures when taking the photo as you say using the compensation dial. It's one to experiment with until you feel comfortable with it. On dull days use + values to brighten the subject and - values on bright days to help add detail to highlighted areas.

As regards the critique, I'm no expert. Anyone can have a go. It's a question of saying how you feel about a shot and what you think may improve it. As regards the highlights in your shot I'm sure that someone adept at using a photo manipulation program such as PSP or PS could add the detail to the shot.
IanF is offline  
Reply With Quote
BF Supporter 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Click here to Support BirdForum
Old Saturday 26th April 2003, 22:01   #5
bcurrie
Registered User

 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Utah, USA
Posts: 979
Hi Paula,

Certainly a wonderful opportunity. DOF is perfect for the background. Clairity is very good, though the tail and lower wing tips are just a tad out of focus. Detail seems to be lacking in the wing feathers. This may have come from quickly have to turn and take the picture, so you may not have been able to have hold the camera as still as you normally would have. It looks like the focal point may have been the grass blades to its right. I agree with Ian about the right side of the bird being a bit overexposed. If you have PS, use the magic wand, then go to levels and lower it. I would start with lowering it by 20, but you may have to go higher. In the future, you may not want to go down a full value point in compensation, -1/3 or -2/3 may work better (each shot is different, so one just has to learn how their camera copes with these changes). As far as the composition, I do like it as a whole, but would have preferred a head on shot. As much as I hate to admit it, they are more attractive to the eye.

Don't get me wrong, very lovely bird and photo.

Rating: 3 stars
__________________
Brian
bcurrie is offline  
Reply With Quote
Advertisement
Reply


Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

{googleads}
Fatbirder's Top 1000 Birding Websites

Search the net with ask.com
Help support BirdForum
Ask.com and get

Page generated in 0.13168406 seconds with 14 queries
All times are GMT. The time now is 09:43.