Join for FREE
It only takes a minute!

Welcome to BirdForum.
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community, dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is absolutely FREE! You are most welcome to register for an account, which allows you to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old Thursday 27th April 2006, 21:12   #1
Roy C
Occasional bird snapper
 
Roy C's Avatar

 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Barnstaple,North Devon,UK
Posts: 14,786
ID Please

Looked through Collins but cannot ID this bird - probably something common but I am poor on these little brown uns. Thanks


Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_5153.jpg
Views:	231
Size:	96.3 KB
ID:	44692  
__________________
MY PHOTOSTREAM
500px Gallery
Roy C is online now  
Reply With Quote
BF Supporter 2007
Click here to Support BirdForum
Old Thursday 27th April 2006, 21:16   #2
Andrew Rowlands
Registered User
 
Andrew Rowlands's Avatar

 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Wales.
Posts: 5,889
Looks like a female Stonechat Roy.


Andy.
Andrew Rowlands is offline  
Reply With Quote
BF Supporter 2004 2005 2006
Click here to Support BirdForum
Old Thursday 27th April 2006, 21:17   #3
lou salomon
the birdonist
 
lou salomon's Avatar

 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Stuttgart
Posts: 8,791
female whinchat, roy
__________________
lou
lou salomon is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old Thursday 27th April 2006, 21:21   #4
lou salomon
the birdonist
 
lou salomon's Avatar

 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Stuttgart
Posts: 8,791
oh my god! how could i. yes, it's a stonechat obviously, because it sits on a stone
__________________
lou
lou salomon is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old Thursday 27th April 2006, 21:27   #5
Henry B
Registered User

 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Lhanbryde-Elgin.
Posts: 3,206
Having a chat.
__________________
henry
Henry B is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Thursday 27th April 2006, 21:40   #6
steve55
Yellow Hammer
 
steve55's Avatar

 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Royston, Herts
Posts: 188
i'll agree with lou and say female whinchat

Steve
__________________
The early bird catches the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese...
steve55 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Thursday 27th April 2006, 21:41   #7
steve55
Yellow Hammer
 
steve55's Avatar

 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Royston, Herts
Posts: 188
i'll agree with lou and say female whinchat

Steve
__________________
The early bird catches the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese...
steve55 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Thursday 27th April 2006, 21:51   #8
Adey Baker
Member
 
Adey Baker's Avatar

 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Hinckley, Leics
Posts: 4,761
I'll have a pint of whatever Andy's been drinking
Adey Baker is online now  
Reply With Quote
BF Supporter 2005 2006 2007 2009
Click here to Support BirdForum
Old Thursday 27th April 2006, 22:15   #9
lou salomon
the birdonist
 
lou salomon's Avatar

 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Stuttgart
Posts: 8,791
mine was just 1 bottle of german hefeweizen
__________________
lou
lou salomon is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old Thursday 27th April 2006, 22:45   #10
lockbreeze926
Sight Without Vision
 
lockbreeze926's Avatar

 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: UK and Florida
Posts: 812
In case Roy is confused by the above, it's a female whinchat.
lockbreeze926 is offline  
Reply With Quote
BF Supporter 2007
Click here to Support BirdForum
Old Friday 28th April 2006, 00:09   #11
Edward woodwood
Member

 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 11,309
Andy was right first off

Stonechat
Edward woodwood is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Friday 28th April 2006, 00:29   #12
steve55
Yellow Hammer
 
steve55's Avatar

 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Royston, Herts
Posts: 188
looking at this picture i think i'd have to change my mind to female stonechat not whinchat

although who's to say that this guy got it right...
__________________
The early bird catches the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese...
steve55 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Friday 28th April 2006, 00:44   #13
Andrew Rowlands
Registered User
 
Andrew Rowlands's Avatar

 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Wales.
Posts: 5,889
So we seem to have a Stonechat/Whinchat situation here.

Would anyone like to say why they think it is one or the other?

ID Threads are most useful when they contain some details on how people came to the conclusion(s) they did.
Andrew Rowlands is offline  
Reply With Quote
BF Supporter 2004 2005 2006
Click here to Support BirdForum
Old Friday 28th April 2006, 01:41   #14
AlexC
Opus Editor
 
AlexC's Avatar

 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Los Angeles, CA, USA
Posts: 4,469
Has white coverts of Stonechat, but white supercilium of Whinchat.

As someone who's had no experience with either bird (been studying Europe guides like crazy lately...) I'm stumped so I think I'll just drink with Adey...
__________________
--Alex (formerly 'overworkedirish')
My Gallery | My Life List of Life (updated 16 December 2010)
Latest Lifer: Hudsonian Godwit (513 World, 461 ABA).
AlexC is offline  
Reply With Quote
BF Supporter 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Click here to Support BirdForum
Old Friday 28th April 2006, 07:27   #15
martin kitching
Obsessed seawatcher

 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: northumberland
Posts: 1,238
This is interesting; a real conundrum.

The bird appears to show the distinct white collar, short primary projection and extensive orange underparts of a Stonechat - and the pale orange uppertail coverts and huge supercilium of a Whinchat! I can't convince myself either way.

martin
__________________
Northern Experience Wildlife Tours www.newtltd.co.uk
Northeast Cetaceans blog northeastcetaceans.blogspot.com
North East Cetacean Project www.northeastcetaceans.org.uk/
martin kitching is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Friday 28th April 2006, 07:27   #16
Adey Baker
Member
 
Adey Baker's Avatar

 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Hinckley, Leics
Posts: 4,761
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew Rowlands
So we seem to have a Stonechat/Whinchat situation here.

Would anyone like to say why they think it is one or the other?

ID Threads are most useful when they contain some details on how people came to the conclusion(s) they did.

Looking again this morning, it seems as if the bird's supercillium could be over-exposed and the bird does look a bit 'tatty' so this could be a well-worn Stonechat - in which case, apologies for being wrong (it has been known!) -but the reason I went for Stonechat was that I've never seen one with such a prominent super - generally, if you saw a bird with a super like that at this time of year you'd go for Whinchat without looking at anything else.

Female Stonechats are usually like dull versions of the male - I've attached 3 shots (sorry, haven't got any Whinchats for comparison!)
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	stonechat 1.jpg
Views:	75
Size:	31.3 KB
ID:	44717  Click image for larger version

Name:	stonechat 2.jpg
Views:	67
Size:	39.1 KB
ID:	44718  Click image for larger version

Name:	stonechat 3.jpg
Views:	82
Size:	24.2 KB
ID:	44719  
Adey Baker is online now  
Reply With Quote
BF Supporter 2005 2006 2007 2009
Click here to Support BirdForum
Old Friday 28th April 2006, 07:32   #17
London Birder
Registered User
 
London Birder's Avatar

 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: London
Posts: 3,335
Stone for moi ...
London Birder is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Friday 28th April 2006, 07:47   #18
Andrew Whitehouse
Professor of Listening
 
Andrew Whitehouse's Avatar

 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Aberdeen
Posts: 13,747
Short primary projection is good for Stonechat, as is the white patch on the wing.
__________________
Andrew

Listening to Birds
Andrew Whitehouse is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old Friday 28th April 2006, 07:52   #19
Adey Baker
Member
 
Adey Baker's Avatar

 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Hinckley, Leics
Posts: 4,761
Quote:
Originally Posted by martin kitching
and the pale orange uppertail coverts... of a Whinchat!

martin
My first Stonechat shot shows orangey upper tail feathers (photo taken in January) so that just leaves the huge supercillium. I suppose the best thing to do is ask Roy if he got any other shots of the bird from different angles, in different light, etc., that show less of a super
Adey Baker is online now  
Reply With Quote
BF Supporter 2005 2006 2007 2009
Click here to Support BirdForum
Old Friday 28th April 2006, 08:00   #20
martin kitching
Obsessed seawatcher

 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: northumberland
Posts: 1,238
Quote:
Originally Posted by Adey Baker
My first Stonechat shot shows orangey upper tail feathers (photo taken in January) so that just leaves the huge supercillium. I suppose the best thing to do is ask Roy if he got any other shots of the bird from different angles, in different light, etc., that show less of a super
Allowing for the effect of light on the colour of the uppertail coverts, and the possibility of over-exposure over-emphasising the supercilium, I'll go with Stonechat.

martin
__________________
Northern Experience Wildlife Tours www.newtltd.co.uk
Northeast Cetaceans blog northeastcetaceans.blogspot.com
North East Cetacean Project www.northeastcetaceans.org.uk/
martin kitching is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Friday 28th April 2006, 08:42   #21
Tom Tarrant
Opus Editor
 
Tom Tarrant's Avatar

 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Brisbane Australia
Posts: 1,037
Here's a Whinchat photographed in Uganda in December (...is probably in the UK now!)
They were very common in there, seen on most of the 23 days of our visit.
Tom

PS: I reckon the 'mystery' bird is a Stonechat though, looks too 'squat' for a Whinchat to me.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	whinchat.jpg
Views:	85
Size:	93.6 KB
ID:	44723  

Last edited by Tom Tarrant : Friday 28th April 2006 at 08:45.
Tom Tarrant is offline  
Reply With Quote
BF Supporter 2008
Click here to Support BirdForum
Old Friday 28th April 2006, 08:47   #22
London Birder
Registered User
 
London Birder's Avatar

 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: London
Posts: 3,335
pp projection is enough ... I've seen a fem Stone with a super that makes this one look regular, but that's another story
London Birder is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Friday 28th April 2006, 10:13   #23
sphinx79
Registered User

 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Falsterbo
Posts: 207
Always useful to look at the throat. Dark throat = Stonechat. Whinchat is pale-throated in all plumages.

Rgds

Greg
sphinx79 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Friday 28th April 2006, 12:06   #24
Capercaillie71
Registered User
 
Capercaillie71's Avatar

 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Deeside, Aberdeenshire
Posts: 3,042
Quote:
Originally Posted by sphinx79
Always useful to look at the throat. Dark throat = Stonechat. Whinchat is pale-throated in all plumages.

Rgds

Greg
I have found this dark throat = stonechat feature to be not entirely reliable. Both species breed near my house and on more than one occasion I have seen a juvenile chat with an apparently dark throat which I have taken to be a stonechat. Usually, once I have convinced myself of its identity, a male whinchat will fly in and start stuffing insects into its mouth. So, either the feature is variable or the whinchats round here get confused!
Capercaillie71 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Friday 28th April 2006, 12:14   #25
Adey Baker
Member
 
Adey Baker's Avatar

 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Hinckley, Leics
Posts: 4,761
Quote:
Originally Posted by martin kitching
Allowing for the effect of light on the colour of the uppertail coverts, and the possibility of over-exposure over-emphasising the supercilium, I'll go with Stonechat.

martin

yes, I'll go along with that, esp as London Birder has seen female Stonechat with a strong super
Adey Baker is online now  
Reply With Quote
BF Supporter 2005 2006 2007 2009
Click here to Support BirdForum
Advertisement
Reply


Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

{googleads}
Fatbirder's Top 1000 Birding Websites

Search the net with ask.com
Help support BirdForum
Ask.com and get

Page generated in 0.20273805 seconds with 34 queries
All times are GMT. The time now is 07:49.