|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: .
Posts: 880
|
Mm2 Ed
I see that Opticron now have the ED version of the MM2 on their website, with it being available in June. The body is £225 and they recommend the use of HDF lenses, so it will work out a little cheaper than the Nikon ED50. I wonder how it will compare optically?
Michael |
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
occasional user
|
Quote:
It's been available in Japan for the last couple of years (under the Vixen brand) but only in a straight version.................you can get it with a 30X eyepiece for about 150 quid. Actually it came out just a month or so after I'd got the non-ED version..........................I wasn't too happy. Judging by the recent mark downs in Japan on this product I'd suggest it isn't as highly thought of as the Nikon........... |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: North Norfolk
Posts: 992
|
Quote:
Have never been that impressed with the overall optical performance of the Mighty Midgets; the IS 50 or 60'S are much better and cheaper pro-rata. If you want a good standard 50mm lightweight spotting scope and fixed mag. lens for under £150 then an IS50 with x20/25 is good value. Out of all the 50mm EDs (including the KOWA 500 series) I feel the Nikon comes out on top, try one if you can. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Quacked up Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Essex, England
Posts: 5,949
|
given none of us have looked through one.....
I'd imagine that on the web the price will be discounted. You can pick up an ED50 for £239 which compares very favourably with the mm2ed so given that the ED50 is waterproof etc they would have to discount it. I presume that's why the price has come down in Japan. The thing against the midget for the travelling birder is the draw-tube. Bit of a drawback in very humid climates. Not sure why the IS50 hasn't sold as well. Feels better built and not much in it optics wise.. You see a lot more MM2's about. I dislike the standard lenses for the MM2 but the image is respectable definitely better than no scope! |
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Registered user
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Newcastle
Posts: 810
|
Quote:
I did consider an MM2 but another friend had trouble with the draw-tube jamming and that's put me off. I haven't been too impressed with his scope using an MM2 zoom. The HDF 40809 (x32 on my main scope) would give x20 with the IS50 and I reckon it would be a great lightweight alternative if used with a monopod to lugging around the ES80 plus tripod, useful though that will still be in the right circumstances. And not too much money. Any thoughts?
__________________
Graham |
|
|
|
| Advertisement |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
|
|