Join for FREE
It only takes a minute!

Welcome to BirdForum.
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community, dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is absolutely FREE! You are most welcome to register for an account, which allows you to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old Monday 29th May 2006, 14:16   #1
gmax
Sontium Dweller
 
gmax's Avatar

 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Gorizia (Friuli Venezia Giulia) NE Italy
Posts: 10,318
Question To RAW or not to RAW: which software is better?

Hello everybody,
after reading a few threads re. RAW shooting (which I'd like to adopt sooner or later ... you've convinced me ... sigh, more time to be spent on my PC ), I've started checking which software would be more user-friendly and less time-consuming.
I've seen many of you suggest using RAWShooter, others prefer the Canon software (Photo something....) but I sadly realized that RAWShooter seems not to be working with Canon cameras, at least newer models (I use a Canon 350D)... am I wrong?
Therefore, which software would you suggest?
Any suggestion or advice about this choice would be welcome.
Thank you,
Max


__________________
- Max -
gmax is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Monday 29th May 2006, 17:35   #2
bpw
Registered User
 
bpw's Avatar

 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Warrington
Posts: 189
Hi Max,

I took the advice of Arthur Morris and bought Breeze Systems software: Downloader Pro for downloading (via a Delkin eFilm reader), and BreezeBrowser Pro for reviewing and converting files. The software is easy to use and in my opinion does a great job.

I've had no experience with other packages, so I can't compare it with the many available. Previously I used the Canon software and USB lead packaged with the camera for downloading (painfully slow) and converted from RAW in Photoshop, but I'm much happier with the results with the Breeze software.

BreezeBrowser Pro - $69.95 (£37.65)
BreezeBrowser Pro + Downloader Pro - $89.90 (£48.38)

Just realised this sounds like a sales pitch! I have no connection with this Company (honest)!
__________________
Paul Weston
www.birdimages.co.uk
www.levelhorizon.co.uk
bpw is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Monday 29th May 2006, 19:20   #3
Roy C
Occasional bird snapper
 
Roy C's Avatar

 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Barnstaple,North Devon,UK
Posts: 14,779
I have tried several and prefer Adobe Camera Raw.
__________________
MY PHOTOSTREAM
500px Gallery
Roy C is online now  
Reply With Quote
BF Supporter 2007
Click here to Support BirdForum
Old Monday 29th May 2006, 20:08   #4
nigelblake
don't re member
 
nigelblake's Avatar

 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Bedfordshire
Posts: 4,035
RAWshooter is compatible with 350D images
I have tried many different RAW converters, I think Breezebrowser pro wins hands down with Capture 1 a close second.
nigelblake is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Monday 29th May 2006, 20:18   #5
DOC
Registered User
 
DOC's Avatar

 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: ISRAEL
Posts: 1,681
I use Rawshooter and find it very user-friendly and easy . It's good enough for my needs AND - It's free. I am sure there are better softwares out there but it all summs down to what your needs are .
__________________
Doc
DOC is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Thursday 1st June 2006, 21:42   #6
graham catley
Registered User
 
graham catley's Avatar

 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Barton-on-Humber
Posts: 514
I have used Rawshooter essentials for a year and found it really user friendly--the 30D is not as yet supported by essentials but they are doing an offer on Rawshooter Premium which works out at £39-16 with VAT (not sure how that works for a downloaded bit of software!) but Premium supports the 30D and has several additional extras to Essentials which allow eg cropping and resizing without going into Photoshop, additional correction tools etc---not keen on paying for software but this £40 will save me time and improve my output so over a year its not a lot to pay
graham catley is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Friday 2nd June 2006, 12:36   #7
mjmw
formally known as mw_aurora
 
mjmw's Avatar

 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Norfolk, UK
Posts: 2,896
Max, I started with Canon's own RAW conversion software, tried direct in Paint Shop Pro - didn't like the results, went back to Canon's, tried Rawshooter (hated the interface and way it works), went back to Canon's...I now use Breezebrowser Pro and will be staying with it. It suits the way I work and found it very easy to use. I also use Downloader Pro - this is a very nice tool, makes downloading and managing from cards so simple.

Graham - why are you not keen on paying for software?

Cheers

Mark.
mjmw is offline  
Reply With Quote
BF Supporter 2007 2008
Click here to Support BirdForum
Advertisement
Reply


Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Software for photography/digiscoping? YellowBudgie The Birdforum Digiscoping Forum 4 Friday 2nd June 2006 18:25
Presentation Slideshow Software Recommendation Lin Evans Books, Magazines, Publications, Video & DVD 2 Thursday 4th May 2006 13:47
list software barryblue Computers, Birding Software And The Internet 8 Wednesday 7th September 2005 19:50
Camedia software graham_t Olympus 4 Wednesday 31st August 2005 19:42

{googleads}
Fatbirder's Top 1000 Birding Websites

Search the net with ask.com
Help support BirdForum
Ask.com and get

Page generated in 0.13535309 seconds with 16 queries
All times are GMT. The time now is 19:29.