Welcome, Guest.
CLICK HERE TO REGISTER


Welcome to BirdForum.
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community, dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is absolutely FREE! You are most welcome to register for an account, which allows you to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old Monday 14th July 2003, 00:13   #1
roadrunner
Fledgling Member
 
roadrunner's Avatar

 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Scottsdale, Arizona, USA
Posts: 25
Question unlisted brand

Where's Pentax? Where's Rollei? Two cameras I own next to my primary Nikons.

Maybe this forum would be better served without the discussion subdivisions? Just pondering while I wander the BF topics as a newbie...

roadrunner is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Monday 14th July 2003, 00:31   #2
KCFoggin
Super Moderator
 
KCFoggin's Avatar

 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Myrtle Beach SC "Smiling Faces, Beautiful Places"
Posts: 46,331
Ponder away roadrunner. Believe it or not, the Admin does a pretty good job of listening to member's wants. So you never know.
__________________
KC a/k/a common KC
If I can't be a good example
then I'll just have to be a horrible warning
KCFoggin is online now  
Reply With Quote
BF Supporter BF Supporter 2004 BF Supporter 2005 BF Supporter 2006 BF Supporter 2007 BF Supporter 2008 BF Supporter 2009
Click here to Support BirdForum
Old Monday 14th July 2003, 00:51   #3
Andy Bright
2nd in command
 
Andy Bright's Avatar

 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Herts
Posts: 6,485
Rollei? you'll be wanting a 'blad forum next? :-) Hardly cameras you see out in the field for bird phtography are they?
You do have a valid point about Pentax though..... we'll see what we can do.
If you do wish to post about slightly more esoteric cameras/formats, this general section (i.e. where you've posted this) should be fine.
Andy
__________________
www.Digiscoped.com
also, if you're particularly bored, try www.andybright.com - mediocre aviation photography
Andy Bright is offline  
Reply With Quote
BF Supporter BF Supporter 2004 BF Supporter 2005 BF Supporter 2006 BF Supporter 2007 BF Supporter 2008 BF Supporter 2009
Click here to Support BirdForum
Old Monday 14th July 2003, 01:08   #4
roadrunner
Fledgling Member
 
roadrunner's Avatar

 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Scottsdale, Arizona, USA
Posts: 25
LOL, Andy, it's true about Rollei, but cameras come in all shapes and sizes. Mine is a 'baby-rollei', not the exalted twin-reflex. I love it for its travelocity, even though it's a range-finder and forces me to guess exposure and focus distance. I've heard that the newest Rollei's, particularly their digital, have features that make it a good birding camera. And the quality and compactness of my baby-rollei has had me thinking seriously of trying digiscoping.
roadrunner is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Monday 14th July 2003, 10:37   #5
normjackson
Registered User

 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Colchester, Essex
Posts: 851
I agree with you K C. Admin created a new forum for Panasonic when there seemed a bit of interest (feel guilty now that things have gone quiet...)

I suppose the feasibility (new found technical proficiency of some members and of course the time of year in Northern hemisphere) has meant that we're seeing a lot of interest in insect photography at the moment on BirdForum. I'm reminded that in a thread by Carlos GY about starting out in nature photography someone mentioned Heather Angel; I think she used a 'blad and (maybe still does) for her close-up work. So you never know, Andy.

BTW I'm currently polishing my article for BirdForum on the safest way to remove albatross excrement from the brass on Gandolphi cameras.
normjackson is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Monday 14th July 2003, 14:36   #6
Tannin
Common; sedentary.
 
Tannin's Avatar

 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Ballarat, Australia
Posts: 1,559
Believe it or not, in my dreams I have found myself thinking about a sort of "Twin Reflex ATS80" lately.

And you know what? If Swarovski (or Leica, or whoever) brought one out - a "double-barrel scope" with one lens for viewing and focussing, the other lens for the camera to go on - I'd order one at 9:00AM tomorrow morning!

(Well, maybe 9:15AM. It would take me 15 minutes to sell my car, wedding ring, and possibly mother in order to raise the money.)
Tannin is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Monday 14th July 2003, 16:04   #7
normjackson
Registered User

 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Colchester, Essex
Posts: 851
Hold on to your dreams, Tony.
It wouldn't do to embarrass yourself in public

For some reason your post immediately made me think of William Dobell's caricature of Snowdon? You know the one, where Snowdon has a long tom on the camera round his neck and the camera strap is quite unnecessarily long? Now would this have had half or double the impact with the device of your invention?
normjackson is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Monday 14th July 2003, 16:42   #8
Tannin
Common; sedentary.
 
Tannin's Avatar

 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Ballarat, Australia
Posts: 1,559
I ain't sayin nuffin!
Tannin is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Monday 14th July 2003, 20:52   #9
normjackson
Registered User

 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Colchester, Essex
Posts: 851
Sorry Tony. Put my last post down to a case of heat exhaustion (have had a lie down now).
This takes me back to my response to your very first post where I mentioned the Kowa TD-1 and rambled on about the idea of standards which might encourage more competition between manufacturers, allow upgrade paths for consumers etc etc. You've bought the best there is as far as digiscoping goes, but I guess you can't help your imagination in seeing how things could be better. Maybe you should go ahead and start the thread you said you were going to (with a pseudonym of "Mel" perhaps if you enjoy ridicule) called "What Digiscoper's Want"
normjackson is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Wednesday 16th July 2003, 12:50   #10
normjackson
Registered User

 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Colchester, Essex
Posts: 851
Tony, there's an article on the new "Four Thirds" standard at :

http://www.megapixel.net/html/issueindex.php?lang=en

Click on the red "Articles" on the right to find it.
normjackson is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Wednesday 16th July 2003, 13:57   #11
Tannin
Common; sedentary.
 
Tannin's Avatar

 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Ballarat, Australia
Posts: 1,559
sob
Tannin is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Wednesday 16th July 2003, 14:02   #12
Tannin
Common; sedentary.
 
Tannin's Avatar

 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Ballarat, Australia
Posts: 1,559
Thankyou, Norm. That looks like a really attractive system. I can see myself buying ... er ... a camera for US $2199, a 600mm equivalent lens for US $7,999. That's ... er .. only .... what is it, 65 Australian cents to the US dollar, plus 10% GST? That's ....

Lots!

No matter. If the format takes off, it will only get cheaper over time, especially if many manufacturers take part and competition sets in.

Interesting reading, real "watch this space" stuff. Thanks for the link.

Tony
Tannin is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Wednesday 16th July 2003, 20:02   #13
Geoff Brown
Registered User

 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Near Boston, Lincolnshire
Posts: 828
Normjackson & Tannin,

You can pretty well bet that this system will take off especially with the big names in photography and electronics backing it. As you state initially prices will be steep but in a few years time will fall as more and more manufacturers jump onto the next money spinning band wagon. But such is progress another rival system will also come along (probably orchestrated by Sony and a rival consortium) that will be in direct competition to this 4:3 system. It had happened many times in the past and human nature and the spirit of competition will ensure it will still happen again in the foreseeable future.
__________________
Geoff Brown
Geoff Brown is offline  
Reply With Quote
BF Supporter BF Supporter 2004 BF Supporter 2005 BF Supporter 2007
Click here to Support BirdForum
Advertisement
Reply


Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

{googleads}
Search the net with ask.com
Help support BirdForum
Ask.com and get

Page generated in 0.14570808 seconds with 22 queries
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 00:07.