|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Playa Vista, California
Posts: 198
|
Zeiss 8x56 or 10x56 FL?
Hello guys,
I am wondering if anyone owns any of the new FL 56mm binoculars? If so, I would be very grateful if you could commnet on a) What's the improvement in image quality between these and the previous 50mm victory series or the good-old Night Owl series? b) How much depth-of-field do the 10x56 have? In other words, how sensitive to focus are these? The reason I am asking the second question is that I notice that high-end 10x42 binos are generally very sesnsitive to focusing. For that reason I don't like them much. I have never had a 10x50 or 10x56 biono so I wonder if 10x56 FLs have the same issue? Thanks for your replies! |
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: NY
Posts: 41
|
Quote:
I've had a pair of Zeiss 8x56 Fl's for almost 2 months now (from Euro Optics, one of the few places that had them in stock at the time). I've always felt that the excessive purple fringing (which I am very sensitive to) of the previous 8x56 Victory model took away from their otherwise excellent optics. I also felt the earlier Night Owl 8x56 had too much fringing. Here is a section from my comment in another thread which you may find helpful: I had been unable to decide for a long time if I preferred the Swarovski 8.5x42 EL to the Zeiss 8x42 FL. I loved the extra brightness and absence of purple fringing of the Zeiss, but also loved the flat field and easy view of the Swarovski's (I didn't like the Swarovski's purple fringing). I recently bought a pair of the new Zeiss 8x56 FL's and these have the best qualities of the other two. The image has the same georgeous contrast and brightness as the Zeiss 8x42 FL, and also the flatness of field and easy view of the Swarovski's. The only downside of the new 8x56 FL is their size. They are big and heavy. Last edited by moman : Thursday 31st August 2006 at 18:54. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Playa Vista, California
Posts: 198
|
Thank you very much for your comments "noman". You pretty much answered my first question.
I have owned various binos in the past (8x56 Night Owl, 10x40 Classic, 8x30 Safari by Zeiss; 8.5x42 EL by Swarovski; 8x20, 8x32, 12x50 BN by Leica and 8x32 HG by Nikon) but I only own the grreat little Nikon 8x32 HG at this time. I have recived a new job offer and might move to Florida, so I am looking forward to treating myself to a great new pair of binoculars upon reciving my first paychek! I look forward to other members commenting on the second question regarding focussing. |
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: NY
Posts: 41
|
Quote:
I did a quick before sundown walk around Wakadahatchee Wetlands in Delray Beach tonight. On the Eastern quarter of boardwalk looking east from the purple roofed Purple martin house I saw 2 Spot-breasted Orioles playing in the fire flag. Just a bit further north in one of the watery openings on the east side of the boardwalk were the 4 Black-bellied Whistling Ducks, 2 adults and 2 juveniles. : : Also beautiful views of White Ibis coming into roost with Snowy, Great and Cattle Egret, Great Blue, Little Blue and Tricolored Heron. Last edited by moman : Friday 1st September 2006 at 21:48. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Playa Vista, California
Posts: 198
|
Thanks for the tips!
|
|
|
| Advertisement |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Comparison of 65mm Scopes: Zeiss vs. Swarovski | aomcm | Spotting Scopes & tripod/heads | 2 | Thursday 2nd March 2006 20:40 |
| My "Ultimate" Choice | guyharrison | Binoculars | 24 | Tuesday 3rd January 2006 20:10 |
| Zeiss "ing" on the cake | richt | Zeiss | 1 | Monday 10th October 2005 19:00 |
| Swaro 8.5ELs vs Zeiss FL 8x42 vs leica Ultravid 10x42 | laurencejackson | Leica | 4 | Thursday 19th May 2005 04:23 |