Welcome, Guest.
CLICK HERE TO REGISTER


Welcome to BirdForum.
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community, dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is absolutely FREE! You are most welcome to register for an account, which allows you to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old Monday 15th January 2007, 03:22   #1
matt green
Registered User
 
matt green's Avatar

 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Norfolk
Posts: 4,995
7x42 BD BR roofs?

Anyone tried these,how might they compare to other more pricey 7x42's?

Looking at the spec they look kinda tempting,I've briefly tried out the 8.5x42
and thought it compared very favourably with leica trinovids.I'd really prefer another 7x42 quality roof to replace my 7x42 porros.

Matt

matt green is offline  
Reply With Quote
BF Supporter BF Supporter 2007
Click here to Support BirdForum
Old Monday 15th January 2007, 03:41   #2
eetundra
Registered User

 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Manitoba
Posts: 198
The 123m@1000m is not nearly as wide as the better 7x42s, which generally have 140-150m@1000m fields. In fact many 8x42s, especially the top models, have a wider field.

I would opine that their relatively narrow field puts them at a distinct disadvantage in the current binocular market.
eetundra is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Monday 15th January 2007, 03:50   #3
matt green
Registered User
 
matt green's Avatar

 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Norfolk
Posts: 4,995
Quote:
Originally Posted by eetundra
The 123m@1000m is not nearly as wide as the better 7x42s, which generally have 140-150m@1000m fields.
Not much for a 7x42 agreed,presumably the 8.5x42 is even less.Still acceptable though,especialy if they have good depth of focus and a nice easy bright image.

Matt
matt green is offline  
Reply With Quote
BF Supporter BF Supporter 2007
Click here to Support BirdForum
Old Monday 15th January 2007, 11:53   #4
desgreene
Registered User
 
desgreene's Avatar

 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Stockport
Posts: 1,333
Have you tried the 7x42 Meopta Meostar? I tried a pair in November when I was upgrading my bins. The only down side is their weight. If you can live with that, then the view was easily as good as anything I tried including Ultravid & Zeiss FL.

Having said that, I did end up buying the Ultravids.

Des.
desgreene is offline  
Reply With Quote
BF Supporter BF Supporter 2004
Click here to Support BirdForum
Old Monday 15th January 2007, 14:45   #5
FrankD
Registered User

 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Eastern Pennsylvania
Posts: 3,519
Quote:
The 123m@1000m is not nearly as wide as the better 7x42s, which generally have 140-150m@1000m fields. In fact many 8x42s, especially the top models, have a wider field.

I would opine that their relatively narrow field puts them at a distinct disadvantage in the current binocular market.
I owned a pair of the 7x42 BD BRs briefly a couple months ago. Optically they were exccelent in just about every regard. They do compare quite well with bins costing significantly more. As mentioned in the above quote though the field of view is noticeably narrower than other 7x42 bins on the market. Coupling the narrower true field of view with the 7x magnification also yields a fairly narrow 49 degree apparent field. If you can get over that issue then I would highly recommend them based on everything else they have to offer for that price.

Quote:
Have you tried the 7x42 Meopta Meostar? I tried a pair in November when I was upgrading my bins. The only down side is their weight. If you can live with that, then the view was easily as good as anything I tried including Ultravid & Zeiss FL.
I would wholeheartedly second that recommendation. The Meostars are about twice the cost of the Minox BD BRs ($380 versus $800) but the image quality of the Meostars is directly comparable with the likes of Leica, Zeiss and Swaro in just about every way. The only two difference I have found is a slightly warm color bias and just a bit more CA around the edges of the field of view on high contrast objects.

Well worth what they are selling them for.
FrankD is offline  
Reply With Quote
Advertisement
Reply


Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Leica Ultravid 7X42 Pileatus Leica 17 Friday 4th April 2008 21:21
Porros versus roofs Hermann Binoculars 40 Monday 31st December 2007 07:29
Best 7x42 ROOFS under $500 jedku Binoculars 23 Thursday 2nd November 2006 15:51
Ultravid 7x42 vs FL 7x42 Jonathan B. Binoculars 8 Tuesday 23rd November 2004 17:30
First impression - Ultravid 7x42 Jaeger70 Leica 21 Wednesday 29th September 2004 10:09

{googleads}
Search the net with ask.com
Help support BirdForum
Ask.com and get

Page generated in 0.11360908 seconds with 15 queries
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:47.