Welcome, Guest.
CLICK HERE TO REGISTER


Welcome to BirdForum.
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community, dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is absolutely FREE! You are most welcome to register for an account, which allows you to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old Sunday 7th September 2003, 23:01   #1
peteh
Registered User

 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Isle of Man
Posts: 750
another 10d question :)

I apologise for another 10d question.

I have noticed there are alot of 10d/100-400mm IS users on birdforum and everyone says how good they are.
What I am wondering is are there any negatives in using a 10d/100-400?
Thanks

Pete.

peteh is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Monday 8th September 2003, 00:02   #2
Art Thorn
Registered User

 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 231
I used to use the 100 - 400 IS with my D30 (sold the body) and found it great, particularly since it behaved like a longer lens. I think it does that with the 10d also. Pictures were sharp, but autofocus was less than perfect with birds in shubbery. But I don't know of any setup that can guess which item in that confusing pile of stuff is the one you want to focus on. So I ended up switching to manual focus quite often.
Art Thorn is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Monday 8th September 2003, 20:14   #3
Geoff Brown
Registered User

 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Near Boston, Lincolnshire
Posts: 828
Can't resist this Petee,

You only get negatives with print film!
__________________
Geoff Brown
Geoff Brown is offline  
Reply With Quote
BF Supporter BF Supporter 2004 BF Supporter 2005 BF Supporter 2007
Click here to Support BirdForum
Old Monday 8th September 2003, 21:20   #4
eric s
Registered User

 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: near boston, MA. USA
Posts: 152
I think it's a wonderful lens. My only complains are:
1) Wish it was lighter (But that is said about any long focal length lens.)
2) Could be sharper. It is very good, but not great. Of course, for the amount of money I'd have to pay for "great", I think I'll stick with "very good". (NOTE: From what I understand, the 400mm DO lens is the same quality as the 400 @400. So that isn't an option! And I want to gain a stop when I upgrade, so I won't use the 400 f5.6.)
3) Quality control. I got a good one, but I've read about others who's pictures a much softer. It happens often enough, and from people that I trust that I believe it's quality control and not just bad technique.
4) Cost. $1,499 USD is a lot of money.
5) The push/pull zoom is annoying, but if you get used to using the locking clutch you get used to it (i.e. it removes zoom creep.)

Art Thorn,

I wanted to double check. Are you blaming the 100-400 for "autofocus was less than perfect with birds in shubbery". The only way this could happen is if the 100-400 caused less contrast in the image that was used by the AF system. I guess that is possible. Are you saying that compared to a lens with the same USM motor system in it, it focuses slower or less precise? (note, you can't tell the speed of the lens just by having USM, I believe there are 3 or 4 different USM systems still in production.) That would be very interesting if it were true! What lens(es) are you comparing it too?

Eric
__________________
I can either laugh or cry. I choose to laugh.

eric s is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Monday 8th September 2003, 21:21   #5
peteh
Registered User

 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Isle of Man
Posts: 750
grooooooannnnnnnn......
thats nearly as bad as Cjws!!
I am sure there are some Stan Boardman videos circulating :|
Where else would these badddddddd gags come from ? :)
peteh is offline  
Reply With Quote
Advertisement
Reply


Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

{googleads}
Search the net with ask.com
Help support BirdForum
Ask.com and get

Page generated in 0.10931802 seconds with 14 queries
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 14:44.