Join for FREE
It only takes a minute!

Welcome to BirdForum.
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community, dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is absolutely FREE! You are most welcome to register for an account, which allows you to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 4 votes, 2.00 average.
Old Saturday 13th September 2003, 18:17   #1
pduxon
Quacked up Member
 
pduxon's Avatar

 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Essex, England
Posts: 5,949
Advice please

I'm thinking of buying a new scope........

I'm considering the Opticron HR66 and ES80 which gives you some idea of budget. Any others I should consider? Fixed or Zoom lens?

I tend to use scopes in hides and don't do a lot of seawatching.

I'm leaning to the 66 because I'm used to using a straight scope at present.

There is no intention of getting into digiscoping.


__________________
Pete

Dethhhpicable
ithhn't it


http://thequacksoflife.blogspot.com/
pduxon is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Saturday 13th September 2003, 18:48   #2
ivewalmer
Registered User
 
ivewalmer's Avatar

 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: SE Kent
Posts: 122
Not sure about models and I'm sure others will help you there. I switched from a straight thru scope to an angled a few years ago and was also concerned about getting used to it. In fact it was really quick and after one trip I could pick up birds as easily as with the straight thru. I find the many advantages to the angled mean that I would never consider a straight thru now (angled is easier to use in most hides, ability to have tripod set lower for more stability, a bit easier to pick up flying birds etc).

Ivan
ivewalmer is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Saturday 13th September 2003, 19:08   #3
digi-birder
 
digi-birder's Avatar

 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: South Yorkshire, UK
Posts: 3,288
We both have the ES80 and also switched from a straight scope (Bushnell Spacemaster) to the angled.

As Ivan says, it was no problem getting used to it and I now could not go back to a straight scope for all the reasons given above.
__________________
Diane.

My second favorite household chore is ironing. My first being, hitting my head on the top bunk bed until I faint. Erma Bombeck
digi-birder is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Saturday 13th September 2003, 19:42   #4
alan_rymer
Registered User

 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Woodley, Berkshire
Posts: 3,800
Pete

I also have the ES80. I use it from hides quite a lot, just rest it on the viewing windowsill and look through sideways kind of. It confuses people sometimes because your head is facing one way, but you're really looking 45 degrees off. You get used to it quickly. I must admit a sighting device would sometimes be useful ( I use it with a stay on case ), Diane and hubby use it naked and use the sight bar!.
__________________
Alan

Its not an optical illusion!. It just looks like one!.
Latest Life bird: Wryneck 28 Aug 2012, Black Necked Grebe 3 Sep 2012
alan_rymer is offline  
Reply With Quote
BF Supporter 2004 2005
Click here to Support BirdForum
Old Saturday 13th September 2003, 19:46   #5
digi-birder
 
digi-birder's Avatar

 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: South Yorkshire, UK
Posts: 3,288
I have to jump in here and defend myself and Keith in that we do not birdwatch in the buff! Alan means without the stay-on case.

The ES80 has a little bar down the side that helps you to line up the subject. I also have the sighting tube from EagleEye that goes round the scope objective end.
__________________
Diane.

My second favorite household chore is ironing. My first being, hitting my head on the top bunk bed until I faint. Erma Bombeck
digi-birder is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sunday 14th September 2003, 09:17   #6
Geoff Brown
Registered User
 
Geoff Brown's Avatar

 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Near Boston, Lincolnshire
Posts: 1,100
Pete,
I have the HR66 although it's the angled version. Used with their Opticron HDF 20ww eyepiece which is for spectacle wearers it seems to suit my eyes and does all that I need a scope for, with a bright sharp high resolution image. As I usually bird in fine weather I cannot tell any difference between looking through it and the Kowas, Leicas, Zeisses and Swarovskis of this world. Of course in poor dull weather it could perhaps be a much different story. However as I say for my type of birding its admirable, and much cheaper than most of the above. As usual try before you buy and compare and contrast as what seems O K for my eyes may not suit yours.
__________________
Geoff Brown
Geoff Brown is offline  
Reply With Quote
BF Supporter 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Click here to Support BirdForum
Old Sunday 14th September 2003, 11:19   #7
alan_rymer
Registered User

 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Woodley, Berkshire
Posts: 3,800
Quote:
Originally posted by digi-birder
I have to jump in here and defend myself and Keith in that we do not birdwatch in the buff! Alan means without the stay-on case.
Spoilsport!.
__________________
Alan

Its not an optical illusion!. It just looks like one!.
Latest Life bird: Wryneck 28 Aug 2012, Black Necked Grebe 3 Sep 2012
alan_rymer is offline  
Reply With Quote
BF Supporter 2004 2005
Click here to Support BirdForum
Old Sunday 14th September 2003, 14:18   #8
pduxon
Quacked up Member
 
pduxon's Avatar

 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Essex, England
Posts: 5,949
Alan - You realise you got me in trouble with Diane in the chat room last night. Sorry Diane!!

If I go the ES80 route what lens would you recommend I was considering the 32x wwHDF or the zoom

obviously I'll have to compare the 66 & 80. It'll have to wait to after my holiday now. I'll probably get it in time for the suffolk trip.
__________________
Pete

Dethhhpicable
ithhn't it


http://thequacksoflife.blogspot.com/
pduxon is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sunday 14th September 2003, 19:02   #9
digi-birder
 
digi-birder's Avatar

 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: South Yorkshire, UK
Posts: 3,288
Quote:
Originally posted by pduxon
Alan - You realise you got me in trouble with Diane in the chat room last night. Sorry Diane!!

If I go the ES80 route what lens would you recommend I was considering the 32x wwHDF or the zoom

obviously I'll have to compare the 66 & 80. It'll have to wait to after my holiday now. I'll probably get it in time for the suffolk trip.
Pete - I think we managed to sort out the misunderstanding!

I bought the 32x eyepiece with the scope, but purchased the 23x when I started to digiscope to cut down the effect of shake with the high magnification.

As you don't intend to try digiscoping, the higher magnification should be OK. It may even fit either of the scopes you have in mind.

Others may recommend the zoom - it's all down to personal preference. They say a fixed eyepiece gives a better image than a zoom at the same setting, although this may be minimal with the quality of today's optics.
__________________
Diane.

My second favorite household chore is ironing. My first being, hitting my head on the top bunk bed until I faint. Erma Bombeck
digi-birder is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sunday 14th September 2003, 19:25   #10
alan_rymer
Registered User

 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Woodley, Berkshire
Posts: 3,800
Quote:
Originally posted by pduxon
Alan - You realise you got me in trouble with Diane in the chat room last night. Sorry Diane!!

If I go the ES80 route what lens would you recommend I was considering the 32x wwHDF or the zoom
Pete
Sorry, but what did I do?. I just described how Diane & Hubby like having theirs, as nature intended ( & Opticron ).

My ES80 came with the x32 eypiece. As my camera has no zoom I purchased the HDF Zoom ( 20-60 ) and enjoy using it immensely. I find it more useful at 20x to locate a bird & then zooming in to get a closer look. If & when I get a better Camera I am sure that at 20x it will be fine!. I don't miss not have the 32x on the scope at all!.


Did you have a good holiday?.
Quote:
Originally posted a the naked scope owner
I bought the 32x eyepiece with the scope, but purchased the 23x when I started to digiscope to cut down the effect of shake with the high magnification.
Diane, I should cut down on the wine, or perhaps put more clothes on, its starting to get cold in the evenings!.
__________________
Alan

Its not an optical illusion!. It just looks like one!.
Latest Life bird: Wryneck 28 Aug 2012, Black Necked Grebe 3 Sep 2012

Last edited by alan_rymer : Monday 15th September 2003 at 07:20.
alan_rymer is offline  
Reply With Quote
BF Supporter 2004 2005
Click here to Support BirdForum
Old Sunday 14th September 2003, 20:12   #11
pduxon
Quacked up Member
 
pduxon's Avatar

 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Essex, England
Posts: 5,949
Diane - I am a bit of a windup merchant. I'll spare your blushes and not tell him your suggestion for the magazine.

Alan - which holiday? I have so many coming up! Last week was a family one where I did the dutiful son bit and took my parents away. Did no formal birding but the National Trust et al provided me with 42 birds. In two weeks time I'm off to the South West for a weeks touring. End of Oct its Suffolk.
__________________
Pete

Dethhhpicable
ithhn't it


http://thequacksoflife.blogspot.com/
pduxon is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Monday 15th September 2003, 07:21   #12
alan_rymer
Registered User

 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Woodley, Berkshire
Posts: 3,800
Pete

We're not doing a Calendar are we?.
__________________
Alan

Its not an optical illusion!. It just looks like one!.
Latest Life bird: Wryneck 28 Aug 2012, Black Necked Grebe 3 Sep 2012
alan_rymer is offline  
Reply With Quote
BF Supporter 2004 2005
Click here to Support BirdForum
Old Monday 15th September 2003, 07:29   #13
pduxon
Quacked up Member
 
pduxon's Avatar

 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Essex, England
Posts: 5,949
I refuse to answer this question because she'll kill me

you're close though
__________________
Pete

Dethhhpicable
ithhn't it


http://thequacksoflife.blogspot.com/
pduxon is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Monday 15th September 2003, 07:31   #14
digi-birder
 
digi-birder's Avatar

 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: South Yorkshire, UK
Posts: 3,288
Quote:
Originally posted by pduxon
I refuse to answer this question because she'll kill me
Too right!!
__________________
Diane.

My second favorite household chore is ironing. My first being, hitting my head on the top bunk bed until I faint. Erma Bombeck
digi-birder is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Monday 15th September 2003, 15:20   #15
alan_rymer
Registered User

 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Woodley, Berkshire
Posts: 3,800
Quote:
Originally posted by pduxon
I refuse to answer this question because she'll kill me
you're close though
Sigh!.
O.K.
__________________
Alan

Its not an optical illusion!. It just looks like one!.
Latest Life bird: Wryneck 28 Aug 2012, Black Necked Grebe 3 Sep 2012
alan_rymer is offline  
Reply With Quote
BF Supporter 2004 2005
Click here to Support BirdForum
Old Saturday 20th September 2003, 17:24   #16
pduxon
Quacked up Member
 
pduxon's Avatar

 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Essex, England
Posts: 5,949
Thanks for your help folks. I found myself with some time late this afternoon and so had a chance to do the audition. Went for the ES80 with the zoom. The Kowa I tried wasn't worth the extra the 66 was good but...... I was uming and ahing between the zoom and the 32x both having their merits and scientifically tossed a coin in the end!

It will of course be discreetly covered up in its stay on case
__________________
Pete

Dethhhpicable
ithhn't it


http://thequacksoflife.blogspot.com/
pduxon is offline  
Reply With Quote
Advertisement
Reply


Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

{googleads}
Fatbirder's Top 1000 Birding Websites

Search the net with ask.com
Help support BirdForum
Ask.com and get

Page generated in 0.22111201 seconds with 24 queries
All times are GMT. The time now is 15:52.