Join for FREE
It only takes a minute!

Welcome to BirdForum.
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community, dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is absolutely FREE! You are most welcome to register for an account, which allows you to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old Tuesday 5th June 2007, 22:45   #1
mports
Registered User
 
mports's Avatar

 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Lancashire
Posts: 71
Minox 8 x 25 Macroscope Monocular

Guys,

I'm practically blind in my right eye - With this in mind purchasing a pair of binoculars seems a little pointless to me, so I'm considering a monocular.

I'm looking for something practical for observing Dragonflies at close range and have come across the Minox 8 x 25 Macroscope, which seems to be nothing other than a Monocular with very close focusing distance of 350mm - Seems perfect for the job to me.

I can get hold of one for £110, however before I go and spend the dosh, I was wondering if anyone had actually seen one?
  • Whats the quality like?
  • Is there anything else I should consider?
Regards

Mark


mports is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Wednesday 13th June 2007, 10:01   #2
number6
Registered User

 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Cambridge
Posts: 111
macroscope

Yes I had a look at one a couple of weeks ago and I think I'll be getting one soon. Good close focus a real bonus, it worked on the paving slabs at my feet so should be good for Dragonflies. Nice construction too.
number6 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Wednesday 13th June 2007, 10:13   #3
mports
Registered User
 
mports's Avatar

 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Lancashire
Posts: 71
Thanks for the reply, I decided to purchase a pair of Pentax Papilio 6.5x21mm binoculars instead - I found them easier to hold.

Overall I'm very impressed, especially considering the £56 cost from Tecno.
mports is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Wednesday 13th June 2007, 10:44   #4
postcardcv
Super Moderator
 
postcardcv's Avatar

 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Norfolk
Posts: 16,473
Quote:
Originally Posted by mports View Post
Thanks for the reply, I decided to purchase a pair of Pentax Papilio 6.5x21mm binoculars instead - I found them easier to hold.

Overall I'm very impressed, especially considering the £56 cost from Tecno.
I just read your first post and was about to suggest these bins for exactly that reason... I've only recently tried them and am very impressed. At £56 they are a great buy, I have a feeling quite a few people will be tempted at that price.
postcardcv is offline  
Reply With Quote
BF Supporter 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Click here to Support BirdForum
Old Wednesday 13th June 2007, 20:35   #5
Mickymouse
Ubuntu Linux user
 
Mickymouse's Avatar

 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Ramsgate, Kent
Posts: 2,563
I've got a Macroscope and to be honest I think you have done the right thing, I wish now I had gone for small bins, the Macroscope is a devil to hold still and it is surprisingly big in your pocket.

Mick
__________________
The World's Need
So many Gods, so many creeds,
So many paths that wind and wind,
When just the art of being kind
Is all this sad world needs.
-- Ella Wheeler Wilcox (1850 to 1919)
Mickymouse is offline  
Reply With Quote
BF Supporter 2004 2005 2007 2008
Click here to Support BirdForum
Old Friday 15th June 2007, 10:57   #6
number6
Registered User

 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Cambridge
Posts: 111
I revisited the local dealer to check the Minox out again, have to say I agree with the comments of Mickymouse . I did not invest.
number6 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Tuesday 8th July 2008, 18:14   #7
Martin_O
Registered User
 
Martin_O's Avatar

 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Malmoe, Sweden
Posts: 10
I got my minox an I'm very satisfied, especially with the macro function. Note that the minox have an thread for tripod, something unusal for an 8x25.
I have some pictures in this thread. http://kikarforum.ning.com/forum/top...3ATopic%3A2000 It's Swedish text, but pictures are international.
Martin_O is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Thursday 20th August 2009, 11:46   #8
jaymoynihan
Corvus brachyrhynchos watcher
 
jaymoynihan's Avatar

 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Lake Michigan Watershed
Posts: 937
As an eye glass wearer, i need to ask, how is the eye relief?

Also, does anyone know of any serious reviews of this model (in English, I am mono-lingual)?

Thanks

Last edited by jaymoynihan : Thursday 20th August 2009 at 20:47.
jaymoynihan is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Thursday 20th August 2009, 23:48   #9
BinoBoy
Registered User

 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Denver
Posts: 385
The eye relief is adequate for my glasses. This was a pleasant surprise because the spec is pretty short.
BinoBoy is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old Friday 21st August 2009, 00:45   #10
Kevin Purcell
Registered User
 
Kevin Purcell's Avatar

 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,778
Quote:
Originally Posted by jaymoynihan View Post
As an eye glass wearer, i need to ask, how is the eye relief?

Also, does anyone know of any serious reviews of this model (in English, I am mono-lingual)?

Thanks
THe Swedish review as translated by Google. It not a great review but at least its readable.

http://translate.google.com/translat...istory_state0=

Last edited by Kevin Purcell : Friday 21st August 2009 at 16:44.
Kevin Purcell is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Friday 21st August 2009, 11:56   #11
jaymoynihan
Corvus brachyrhynchos watcher
 
jaymoynihan's Avatar

 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Lake Michigan Watershed
Posts: 937
Thanks Binoboy & Kevin.
jaymoynihan is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Friday 21st August 2009, 16:36   #12
Hoyden
Registered User

 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Rockville, MD
Posts: 46
My partner uses a Minox 8x25 as her primary birding glass. She has a field deficit (from an aneurysm) in one eye that makes it impossible for her to use binoculars. I'd say for a small minocukar, it does an amazing job and she has no problems using it - she used to also carry a small spotting scope that she used handheld, but now she mostly shares the big scope and uses her Minox the way I use binoculars.

Here in the US, you can sometimes pick them up on ebay for a screaming deal - I paid under $75 for hers new and there is one on there now for a buy it now of $78.

Jackie
Hoyden is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Monday 9th November 2009, 09:18   #13
Chris Sharpe
Registered User
 
Chris Sharpe's Avatar

 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Caracas, Venezuela
Posts: 54
I have a Minox Macroscope that I acquired for my 7 year old son when his binoculars broke in transit to the UK last August. I had intended to get him a new pair of binoculars but he insisted on this monocular instead. As it turned out, he would not be parted from it for the duration of our trip, using it to examine lizards, dragonflies and moths as well as birds. I even found myself leaving behind my heavy 10x42 Leicas in the knowledge that I could always pinch the Minox if we ran into something unusual. I ended up using it to check through gull flocks, confirm the identity of buzzards, examine butterflies and even do a bit of private seawatching while everyone else was in the Minack Theatre. Together, we enjoyed excellent views of a Peregrine harassing Rock Doves as we scrambled down a rock face where binoculars would have been out of the question. In my view the Minox Macroscope is both a good primary optic for kids as well as a handy tool to take on a walk when binoculars are just that little bit too bulky. I was very impressed by the optical quality, which was far superior to the similar sized 8 x 25 type binoculars we had tried. And the close focus makes it ideal for viewing insects. I wear spectacles and had no problem with the eye relief. On the basis of the Macroscope, I would be keen to try some Minox binoculars for myself.
__________________
Birds and Birding in Venezuela: http://www.birdvenezuela.com
Provita: http://www.provitaonline.org
Unión Venezolana de Ornitólogos: http://www.uvovenezuela.org
Neotropical Bird Club: http://www.neotropicalbirdclub.org
Chris Sharpe is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Thursday 12th November 2009, 12:08   #14
BobinKy
Registered User
 
BobinKy's Avatar

 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Kentucky, USA
Posts: 418
Quote:
Originally Posted by Martin_O View Post
I got my minox an I'm very satisfied, especially with the macro function. Note that the minox have an thread for tripod, something unusal for an 8x25.
I have some pictures in this thread. http://kikarforum.ning.com/forum/top...3ATopic%3A2000 It's Swedish text, but pictures are international.
Martin...

What can you tell us about the tripod in the above pictures? It looks interesting.

...Bob
Kentucky, USA
BobinKy is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Thursday 12th November 2009, 15:20   #15
iveljay
Registered User

 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Wiltshire, England
Posts: 416
Is it a Manfrotto modo 785B?
iveljay is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Friday 5th February 2010, 03:33   #16
Nessus
Registered User

 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: NYC
Posts: 267
Before anyone buys one of these make absolute sure they are fully multicoated. I just bought the little 8x16 monocular and it performs like a ten dollar piece of junk except with good clarity. They are no coatings on any surfaces. Shine a light down the objective and every reflection is full white.

In anything but full bright light it's useless and about as good as a Tasco. They should be embarrassed selling this garbage. Many sites even list this item as multicoated. I'm livid and feel cheated, I want them to give me credit or take it back,special order or not. This is disgraceful for a such a famous German optics company to be selling optics with no coatings in the modern age.

Last edited by Nessus : Friday 5th February 2010 at 03:36.
Nessus is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Friday 5th February 2010, 16:31   #17
Hoyden
Registered User

 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Rockville, MD
Posts: 46
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nessus View Post
Before anyone buys one of these make absolute sure they are fully multicoated. I just bought the little 8x16 monocular and it performs like a ten dollar piece of junk except with good clarity. They are no coatings on any surfaces. Shine a light down the objective and every reflection is full white.
The Minoscope 8x25 is fully multi-coated.

Jackie
Hoyden is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Friday 26th February 2010, 01:34   #18
Nessus
Registered User

 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: NYC
Posts: 267
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoyden View Post
The Minoscope 8x25 is fully multi-coated.

Jackie
Glad to hear it. I'm absolutely fuming at Minox over selling me their overpriced piece of junk. Because of the reputation of a good German company I didn't do my proper research to find that monocular was barely coated and therefore works horribly.

I feel they used their good name to sucker me into buying overpriced junk. At least you have yourself some nice modern optics there.
Nessus is offline  
Reply With Quote
Advertisement
Reply


Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
monocular question rkulla Spotting Scopes & tripod/heads 2 Tuesday 20th June 2006 02:32
monocular or bins??? christianbirder Binoculars 17 Thursday 11th May 2006 06:28
Monocular Gray C Opticron 0 Friday 8th April 2005 08:27
monocular option? librarygirl Binoculars 21 Sunday 6th March 2005 01:14

{googleads}
Fatbirder's Top 1000 Birding Websites

Search the net with ask.com
Help support BirdForum
Ask.com and get

Page generated in 0.19388294 seconds with 27 queries
All times are GMT. The time now is 16:11.