Welcome, Guest.
CLICK HERE TO REGISTER


Welcome to BirdForum.
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community, dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is absolutely FREE! You are most welcome to register for an account, which allows you to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old Friday 3rd October 2003, 16:40   #1
eric s
Registered User

 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: near boston, MA. USA
Posts: 152
macro lens or extention tubes

I wondered you preference. I've read some John Shaw, and he (at the time of writing) leanded towards using tubes and between 105 & 200mm. I agree with his logic (lets you stay further away from the subject, thereby not disturbing it... among other things.)

One plus for macro lenses is that I keep hearing how great the optics are. This seems to be a common thread around them... to the point that I wonder if it has something to do with the demands of macro work that it must have it.

I just wondered what you (and others) thought.

Eric

__________________
I can either laugh or cry. I choose to laugh.

eric s is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Friday 3rd October 2003, 16:56   #2
nigelblake
don't re member
 
nigelblake's Avatar

 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Bedfordshire
Posts: 3,975
This is mainly dependent on whether you are shooting on film or digital, but most lenses have higher resolution capabilities than the medium upon which you record the image.
I personally prefer extension tubes as they can be used on all lenses, I often use them with long lenses as they reduce the minimum focusing distance, for instance the min focus on my 600mm is 5.5 metres, with a 12mm extension tube this comes down to about 4.2 metres and with a 25mm tube its about 3.3 metres, particularly good for small birds or close head shots, you do lose the ability to focus to infinity when tubes are fitted though.
Macro lenses will (generally)give better edge of frame definition, but as most subjects occupy the central areas of frame and the surrounding area is often the out of focus background you will not really notice the difference unless you want to photograph very flat subjects in close-up.
nigelblake is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Friday 3rd October 2003, 17:56   #3
helenol

 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 3,748
I am getting quite confused with all this macro business (doesn't take much to confuse me).

Having just purchased the C750UZ, I've been going around photographing all manner of things close up in macro.

Can the macro mode be used in other instances, or am I misunderstanding this post entirely....?

Helen
a novice
helenol is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Friday 3rd October 2003, 18:44   #4
eospete
Registered User
 
eospete's Avatar

 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Lancashire
Posts: 41
I will happily use extension tubes with my 100-400mm lens in preference to using the 100mm macro. It helps blow out the background or keep a good working distance for sensitive or shy subjects.
__________________
Regards to one and all
P
eospete is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Friday 10th October 2003, 19:29   #5
George McCarthy
Registered User

 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Horsham West Sussex
Posts: 39
When I am shooting close-up subjects I use macro lenses. When I am shooting subjects at a distance with longer telephoto lenses and I want a bigger image I add a converter or I move closer and add an extension tube.

My preference is to use macro lenses everytime especially when taking images up to 1/1 or lifesize. The reason I do so is simply because I want the best possible image available and that's what true macro lenses give me.

Canon manufacture three true macro lenses in focal lengths of 50mm, 100mm and 180mm and I carry all three. They are flat-field lenses, in other words ultra sharp from the centre to the edges. Their quality is amazing when used correctly.

So the answer to your question is that I use both macro lenses and extension tubes and what I use at any one time really depends on the subject and how I want to portray it in my picture.

Would I rather use a 100mm lens and an extension tube in preference to a 100mm macro?

You must be joking - No chance!

Thanks for your question. George Mccarthy
__________________
http/www.georgemccarthy.com

Last edited by George McCarthy : Friday 10th October 2003 at 19:34.
George McCarthy is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Friday 10th October 2003, 19:38   #6
eric s
Registered User

 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: near boston, MA. USA
Posts: 152
And thank you for your answer! (And for contributing here.)

You told me what I wanted to know, and a bit more.

Eric
__________________
I can either laugh or cry. I choose to laugh.

eric s is offline  
Reply With Quote
Advertisement
Reply


Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Search the net with ask.com
Help support BirdForum
Ask.com and get

Page generated in 0.11906505 seconds with 15 queries
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:07.