|
|
|
|
|
|
Welcome to BirdForum. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread |
Tuesday 7th August 2007, 23:17
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 42
|
teleconverters 1.5 0r 2.0
I have a minolta maxxum 5. I am going to buy a Sony alpha a100 because of the lens mount. I have 1 75-300mm lens. would using a 1.5 or 2.0 teleconverter take away from image quality. I have seen pictures taken with teleconverters that look glassy and have kind of a flare on the outline of the subject.
__________________
-Photographer Nick "Say Cheese." |
|
|
|
Sunday 30th September 2007, 11:21
|
#2 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Tampa Bay Florida
Posts: 203
|
Nick I have a 1.4X Sigma and a 2.0X Kenko tele plus. Both work fine on my old 300 f 2.8 in manual mode. The lens does not auto anything bare --too old. Picture quality wise I do not notice any difference. However neither work with my 100-300. The 1.4 physically does not allow the 100-300 to mount as the rear element of the zoom is in the way and the 2X will not lock on auto focus.
|
|
|
|
| Advertisement |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Teleconverters | Kezza | Nikon | 13 | Tuesday 11th March 2008 10:24 |
| Teleconverters | greenbunion | Nikon | 22 | Thursday 1st September 2005 12:52 |
| Teleconverters? | JSI | Cameras And Photography | 11 | Thursday 21st July 2005 13:10 |
| VR 80-400 AF + Teleconverters | Stephen North | Nikon | 5 | Tuesday 5th July 2005 16:28 |
| Teleconverters | Dave Smith | Nikon | 7 | Saturday 1st March 2003 13:33 |
