|
Welcome, Guest. |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Vicksburg, Mississippi
Posts: 278
|
Macro Lens with DSLR
This may not be the right place but I wanted to post here since its dealing with a digital slr and macro lens. I just got a Sigma 105mm EX Macro lens and it seems like I cannot get my entire subject in focus. I know that this will be characteristic to a certain extent depending on how deep the subject extends into the background but for example this fly image, the feet and the wing tip are not in focus. Is this characteristic of macro lenses?
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: near boston, MA. USA
Posts: 152
|
I don't know for what settings you were using on this picture, so I can't say for sure. But the depth of field in macro work can be extremely small. Amazingly small. From what I understand, f22 is not an uncommon setting to try to increase the DOF as much as possible.
What you show here is smaller than I would expect, but I am no macro expert by any means. You might want to post the question in a forum which regularly shows macro work (since there doesn't seem to be a dedicated macro forum.) Someone who does macro work might be able to give you more info. Eric
__________________
I can either laugh or cry. I choose to laugh. |
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Guest
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Vicksburg, Mississippi
Posts: 278
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: vancouver
Posts: 4
|
You'll have to stop down your lens my friend!
Depth Of Field (DOF) narrows as you get closer to an object. (This getting close is labeled -- or mislabeled; depends on your opinion -- macro). Somewhere on the top deck of your DSLR is an o with a - through it. This is the film plane (or sensor plane for digital) -- the ground zero of your camera if you will. Distances are measured from there, not from the front of your lens. Now, take your fly. Lets say it's one foot away from the film plane and your lens is at f5. At that f-stop the DOF you have is less then 1/16 of an inch (about 1.6mm). Obviously our friend the fly (who may be 1/4 inch top to bottom) is not going to be completely in focus. But...say we shoot the exact same shot with the exact same camera/lens at f22. Suddenly we'd have .28 of an inch (about 7mm) -- and that is slightly more then the 1/4 inch of depth we need if we want to see our friend sharp -- from the tip of his adorable head to his funky little feet. And to close; DOF changes whenever we change the focal length of our lens or our f-stop. If you want a copy of a rather slick DOF calculator you can use Mikes that is found here; http://tinyurl.com/shvd (sorry don't know if this will turn into a live link...I've only made one other post) And please…feel free to ask for clarification if I've bumbled something up...jim Last edited by p645n : Monday 27th October 2003 at 10:09. |
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Guest
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Vicksburg, Mississippi
Posts: 278
|
Quote:
I was use to taking photos with the 18-55mm lens and was expecting for things to be the same with this when apparently they are not. F8 with the 18-55mm lens was usually sufficient. Thanks for this valuable information. |
|
|
|
| Advertisement |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| digiscoping with Dslr.....possible? | Paulyoly | Digiscoping cameras | 12 | Tuesday 14th October 2003 05:03 |
| macro lens or extention tubes | eric s | Macro Photography | 5 | Friday 10th October 2003 19:38 |
| DIY fisheye lens | walwyn | Cameras And Photography | 0 | Tuesday 23rd September 2003 15:17 |
| Filters & lens hoods for digicams? | HelenB | Cameras And Photography | 3 | Saturday 5th April 2003 23:27 |
| Canon EF 50mm f/2.5 Compact Macro lens | Medlock44 | Canon | 0 | Tuesday 18th February 2003 19:38 |