Welcome, Guest.
CLICK HERE TO REGISTER


Welcome to BirdForum.
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community, dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is absolutely FREE! You are most welcome to register for an account, which allows you to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old Tuesday 25th September 2007, 09:24   #1
peter1964
Registered User

 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: London
Posts: 20
Minox HGs V's Nikon HGLs

HAVE BEEN CONSIDERING GETTING EITHER NIKON hgl 8X32 OR ALTERNATIVELY SOME MINOX hg 8X33 OR THEIR 8.5X43. CAN ANYONE MAKE THE CHOICE EASIER??

peter1964 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Tuesday 25th September 2007, 11:37   #2
BobinKy
Registered User
 
BobinKy's Avatar

 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Kentucky, USA
Posts: 322
I have not looked through the Nikon hgl 8x32 (or its American version). However, two months ago I wanted to find a lighter binocular for bird and wildlife observing--to supplement my Swift Audubon 820ED 8.5x44 porro. I settled upon the Minox HG 8x33 BR roof.

What I like about the Minox is the size and weight, neutral color rendering, flat field, precision focusing, twist up eye cups, FOV, close focus, strap, case, and all of the optical engineering to produce these great daytime views.

What I would like to see changed about the Minox is longer eye relief, better detail in low light situations, more depth of field, armor that does not attract dirt and dust like a magnet, focus wheel with black finish rather than shiny bright metal, and better objective lens covers.

All in all, I get very positive comments from others--comparing it to a Leica.

I hope this helps.

--Bob
Kentucky, USA
BobinKy is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Tuesday 25th September 2007, 11:41   #3
postcardcv
Super Moderator
 
postcardcv's Avatar

 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Norfolk
Posts: 14,811
the best bet would be to get along to a shop and test the two side by side for yourself - it's not just a matter of optics but also how they feel in the hand and how they focus.
__________________
www.blueskybirds.co.uk
postcardcv is online now  
Reply With Quote
BF Supporter BF Supporter 2007 BF Supporter 2008 BF Supporter 2009
Click here to Support BirdForum
Old Tuesday 25th September 2007, 11:49   #4
PYRTLE
Registered User

 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: North Norfolk
Posts: 541
The Nikon HGL (8x32) is a very underated high spec roof prism - postcard is spot on in that you really have to physically test a binocular before buying it.....written technical spec is fine / reports are onlu one person's view and in most cases should be taken as read eg. Someone is not going to give a bad report on an optic if they are paid or receive a free pair from that company - get my point!

Given the optics you mention, I personally would also consider the Swarovski 8 x 30 SLC.

Best of luck, but please do get to a specialist optics dealer before buying.
PYRTLE is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Tuesday 25th September 2007, 13:17   #5
trealawboy
Registered User
 
trealawboy's Avatar

 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Here
Posts: 382
I have only very briefly looked through Minox HGs, and not the model you want. I do own the Nikon HG 8x32s however, which I use as my primary birding binoculars. They are an excellent pair of bins and certainly rank alongside the other so-called top brands. I like the fast-focussing very much, but its not to everyone's taste. Close-focus, field of view, sharpness and contrast are excellent. Some BFers refer to excessive chromatic aberration with the Nikons, but I've never observed it with my pair. Their eye-cups are not as hard-wearing as some others.

Two reviews worth reading may be found at Alula and Better View Desired. Note, these review the older incarnation, the HGs. The HGLs are the same optically, but housed in a lighter body and are manufactured using more environment-friendly processes.
__________________
Trealaw Boy

Last edited by trealawboy : Tuesday 25th September 2007 at 13:24.
trealawboy is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old Tuesday 25th September 2007, 14:31   #6
iveljay
Registered User

 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Wiltshire, England
Posts: 185
The Minox 8x33 HGs are my most used binoculars. They initially took some time to get set up for best viewing and the variable rate focussing can confuse if trying out next to another make. Some people find them difficult to focuss critically; according to a recent birding magazine review.

My Zeiss FL bin is probably the 'best' with Nikon EII s close behind but they arn't the first I grab. Irrational perhaps but it all boils down to what feels right for each of us considering, condition of eyes, weight, balance, peer pressure, steadiness of hand, and what we use them for, etc.

Nikon HGLs are good - they just didn't give me the buzz that triggers me into parting with money at the time which the EIIs did.

Generally the advice must be to try them - making sure that you get the dioptre setting at least roughly right and if one doesn't have the 'zing' factor try others. If you can't try - buy the most recommended. (search Birdforum). A lot of published tests are a bit long in the tooth or only cover some models but still give useful ideas of what to look for.

Clearly the best binocular is closely related to the meaning of life - when you find it please let me know. (and I bet that you will get a flood of posts on why you are wrong).

J
iveljay is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Tuesday 25th September 2007, 14:49   #7
NoSpringChicken
Registered User
 
NoSpringChicken's Avatar

 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Norfolk
Posts: 9,046
Am I missing something here or is this an incredibly good price for the Minox 8x33 HG?

http://www.sherwoods-photo.co.uk/min...x_bino_fs.html

Ron
NoSpringChicken is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old Tuesday 25th September 2007, 16:52   #8
SteveClifton
Registered User

 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: N Yorks
Posts: 738
Nikon obviously spent all the development budget on the optics, not on the fit & finish of the HG's. I've had them just over 2 years (8x32's), and already have lost one of the little triangular badges from the front of the barrels. The other one is still held on by its double -sided tape! but the black paint is peeling from it. Also the rubber eyecups have become distorted and could do with replacing. Some might say these are minor points which don't affect the performance, but they look quite tatty-not something you should expect from a 'top' binocular.

Still, I intend to keep them and have no complaints about the handling or view they offer, especially at the bargain price I paid!

I haven't yet had cause to try out their customer service, but have heard mixed reviews. It will be interesting to see how they look and feel after another 2 years.
SteveClifton is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Wednesday 26th September 2007, 04:05   #9
jacquot
Registered User

 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Larchmont, NY, USA
Posts: 239
I've had my Nikon 8x32 LX's for a year and they are perfect. They have accompanied me on various field projects in winter and summer with no physical problems. They are a great glass, with some CA, as other alpha glasses, but with a detailed, flat, wide and contrasty view with good color. They are also available at good prices if you look around. I haven't had to use the warrantee, but it is as good as it gets on paper. I purchased mine at a very good price as demos. The x32 LX (HG)'s are the ones to look for, not the LX-L, as the weight difference is not an issue and the view (and price) is better. I have not looked at the Minox, but I do also have Zeiss Fl's (10x32), which are another step up from the Nikons. Nikon, Zeiss and Leica have upgraded recently, and prices might be increasingly favorable for the older models. I LOVE what I see through my Zeiss. Each model has it's quirks, unfortunately, which are well documented on these lists. In the end, what you can see--with your eyes, when all works well--is what counts.
David
jacquot is offline  
Reply With Quote
BF Supporter BF Supporter 2007 BF Supporter 2008 BF Supporter 2009
Click here to Support BirdForum
Old Wednesday 26th September 2007, 20:49   #10
iveljay
Registered User

 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Wiltshire, England
Posts: 185
Re Sherwood's prices - they were selling them at £475 back in July and were about the cheapest price then.
If I hadn't already got a pair... never mind, I've had the pleasure of using them which is the whole point.
This must make them a worth trying out. (N.B. RRP is still listed as £599)

J
iveljay is offline  
Reply With Quote
Advertisement
Reply


Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Minox HG 10x43 or Nikon SE 10x42? Glimmer Binoculars 49 Tuesday 5th August 2008 20:40
Minox BL vs Nikon Monarch etc matt green Binoculars 6 Wednesday 3rd January 2007 19:06
Minox vs Nikon SE alfredotod Binoculars 5 Tuesday 29th August 2006 14:10
Nikon HGLs Eric F Nikon 44 Monday 1st November 2004 19:32
Nikon 60mm fieldscope or Minox 62 ED DHB Spotting Scopes & tripod/heads 32 Sunday 22nd August 2004 17:34

{googleads}
Search the net with ask.com
Help support BirdForum
Ask.com and get

Page generated in 0.14466906 seconds with 20 queries
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 14:33.