• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

New Zealand - North Island (4 Viewers)

Ian Cockburn

Active member
Any ideas gratefully received. Poor shot taken at distance.
Many thanks. Ian
 

Attachments

  • IMG_2007.JPG
    IMG_2007.JPG
    176.4 KB · Views: 85
  • IMG_2014.JPG
    IMG_2014.JPG
    197.9 KB · Views: 85
Siberian Sandplover, formerly Lesser Sandplover?

That would be my first guess as well, but I'm rubbish at plovers. These ones are quite plain, which even in non-breeding plumage makes a lot of the "ringy" plovers unlikely, and I get the impression that they're small (so lesser sand-plover rather than greater, perhaps) but I haven't a clue how to confirm that guess and I am not very optimistic that, even given this site's members' encyclopedic knowledge of things like primary projection or foot shape, such signs can be spotted in these photos.
 
That would be my first guess as well, but I'm rubbish at plovers. These ones are quite plain, which even in non-breeding plumage makes a lot of the "ringy" plovers unlikely, and I get the impression that they're small (so lesser sand-plover rather than greater, perhaps) but I haven't a clue how to confirm that guess and I am not very optimistic that, even given this site's members' encyclopedic knowledge of things like primary projection or foot shape, such signs can be spotted in these photos.
Not a very 'scientific' reply but I can't think of any other species (..apart from GSP) that would be there in those numbers, most other possible plovers would be in much smaller groups...
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top