• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

Upcher`s Warbler ? (1 Viewer)

How does that reconcile with pp to tertial ratio, ie pp being 3/4 of the overlying tertials, surely EO is just half?
I'm measuring a pp of 65-70% which is exactly what elaeica EOW should have (only nominate pallida has around 50%), with Upcher's pp being around 75-80%.
 
I'm measuring a pp of 65-70% which is exactly what elaeica EOW should have (only nominate pallida has around 50%), with Upcher's pp being around 75-80%.
Quite right, I inadvertently placed the ruler on T2-to the highest feather on the covert bar.😮

…..just testing😉
 
Andy Hi, why EO over UW?
Cheers
Hi Ken. The question ought to be why UW in a location where it doesn't occur!

Lou has rightly pointed out the long P1, but I would expect Upcher's to look more contrasting, with darker tertials and primaries, as well as showing a longer, fuller tail with a darker rear portion. Like Olive-tree, Upcher's has a pale wing panel too.

Upcher's is much easier to identify in the field as it behaves in a distinctive way (clumsy movements and lots of tail-waving/swishing and fanning).
 
Warning! This thread is more than 1 year ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top