Gustavo Jimenez
Well-known member
Discussion thread for Category:Locations. If you would like to add a comment, click the Post Reply button.
-
Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.
Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Category:Locations (1 Viewer)
- Thread starter Gustavo Jimenez
- Start date
Gustavo Jimenez
Well-known member
The Buzzard of the new world are not inside of the Falconiformes order. Last time they put it in the Ciconiiformes order, but now nobody dont know where it belongs or maybe to intruduce a new order Carthatiformes.
When it was decided to go ahead and do a taxonomic system in Opus, a rather arbitrary decision was made to follow Clements 2007. Changes to this may happen when a new version of the major checklists come out, but not as individual scientific papers come out. This is similar to the way common and scientific names are handled in Opus: status quo is maintained unless there is a consensus for a change among the checklists.
And yes, Clements treat all day raptors as falling within falconiformes, including new world vultures. There may be data out there to dispute that placement, but the editors (all of us) of Opus are not taxonomic experts and cannot decide which papers to believe and which not. By waiting until a clear position is taken by the checklist makers, Opus is somewhat more stable than what it would otherwise be.
It would, however, be perfectly acceptable, even great, if you could add a little on the position of these birds to the appropriate Category, probably best to Category:Cathartidae, saying that recent papers suggest another placement, and give a reference if at all possible.
Cheers
Niels
And yes, Clements treat all day raptors as falling within falconiformes, including new world vultures. There may be data out there to dispute that placement, but the editors (all of us) of Opus are not taxonomic experts and cannot decide which papers to believe and which not. By waiting until a clear position is taken by the checklist makers, Opus is somewhat more stable than what it would otherwise be.
It would, however, be perfectly acceptable, even great, if you could add a little on the position of these birds to the appropriate Category, probably best to Category:Cathartidae, saying that recent papers suggest another placement, and give a reference if at all possible.
Cheers
Niels
Similar threads
