• BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is absolutely FREE!

    Register for an account to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Am. "Robin"
Doc Duck

Am. "Robin" (Turdus migratorius)

I just discovered that Sibley's Field Guide to Birds of Western North America doesn't index this red-breasted thrush among the thrushes but indexes it (and Turdus ruffopalliatus) under the misnomer "Robin". They do appear in the middle of the Thrushes in the main part of the book, however. It's just the index that is "incorrect", probably because a lot of Americans, unfamiliar with real Robins, don't realize that American "Robins" are thrushes and wouldn't find it in the index if it were listed that way. Sigh. Oh well. Not the bird's fault, anyway. And they are quite pretty |=)|
Habitat
garden
Location
Petaluma Hill Rd, Santa Rosa, CA
Date taken
26 Sep 2018
Scientific name
Turdus migratorius
Equipment used
D90, 80-400
Staff member
Opus Editor
Supporter
Well, this American new that ;)

A very lovely closeup of this Robin Ann!
 
beautiful photo of this handsome thrush, Ann, captured in a gorgeous setting, top class, many tfs!!!
 
Staff member
Opus Editor
Supporter
LOL .... yes they are pretty, but nothing like a 'robin' are they. Surely it could be listed in both sections?

Whatever part of the list, and whatever it's called, still a lovely bird and a great picture.

Well done Ann.
 
Supporter
I agree with KC and Delia! 1) Yes, there are many Americans, especially birders, who do know this. I'm pretty sure my parents told me this when I was a kid (they could be pretty pedantic about such things). At the same time, I'm also pretty sure there are many Americans who, at best, know the bird's common name. This might be true for some folks who are curious about birds but not yet birders, so it might be helpful in terms of getting them involved if they find it easy already as newbies to birding to find information in a field guide. 2) I think that point 1 is a good argument for a double listing in the index. Indexes can be flexible that way, allowing all levels of birders to find what they're looking for. Of course, in a sense that double listing is already the case as the index probably also shows Latin names. I forgot to check that. Birders who know these are thrushes will likely also know to look under Turdus. Still, a triple listing - common, Latin, and correct family group - would only add one line to the index, maybe 1 page total due to other similar examples. If I'd been indexing the book, that's what I would have gone for. That might also be helpful for visiting birders from Europe who immediately see this is a Thrush and who are accustomed to searching by common name rather than Latin. Of course, if they just looked at the other birds listed under Thrushes and flipped to the first page, they would find Am Robins there on the second or third (I think it was) page of Thrushes. So I guess that need is already covered.
 
Lovely pose and setting, Ann. Interesting information, too, thank you.
 

Media information

Category
North America
Added by
Doc Duck
Date added
View count
31
Comment count
8

Share this media

Top