tjsimonsen
Well-known member
Just a few additions (mainly to Overread's excellent post): While probably the best (but also more expensive) choice for nervous critters, the 150/180 macros need an adapter if you wish to fit a dedicated macro flash. Also, the longer lenses are more demanding with respect to hand-holding skills.
Yes, many general zooms have fine "near macro" abilities. I have loads of good butterfly and dragonfly shots from my EF100-400L. BUT none of those lenses give you a background blur that is anywhere near what a true macro will give you (even stopped down to f8-11) - especially in tricky situations. The quality of the background blur is an often over looked aspect of macro photography.
Thomas
Yes, many general zooms have fine "near macro" abilities. I have loads of good butterfly and dragonfly shots from my EF100-400L. BUT none of those lenses give you a background blur that is anywhere near what a true macro will give you (even stopped down to f8-11) - especially in tricky situations. The quality of the background blur is an often over looked aspect of macro photography.
Thomas