So one person sees one thing, and another person sees the opposite, SE:SV, SV:SE, C'est la vie, each
opinion equally valid (as surely .TRUE. as the conditions tested differ) - pointless internet repetition of opinion is no validation, being of no truck in swaying these immutable facts.
Heck Sancho
even clouds the issue further by flip-flopping like a weather vane in a willy-willy! (last seen interminably weighing up an SV in one hand, an EII in the other, incoherently muttering something about ~ "I used to be confused - but now, I'm not so sure! .....") :h?: :-O
And that is perfectly valid also. :smoke:
It means we have two fine bins which have been carefully eye-balled and scrutinised in actual testing. Bravo Stephen :clap: Ole'! Sancho :t:
(dennis too - hope you get to do a more detailed testing with the EDG, SE, and SV, outside in normal use conditions, and
start a thread to report your findings - I think we'd all be interested in that ..... ) :brains:
So as Stephen, and George, enunciate, with such line-ball optical performance, many other factors come in to play, in the final purchase decision.
I was pondering one of these minor (fringe) factors, namely the much vaunted 3D effect of porros, and conducted a little experiment (admittedly with far too many variables such as magnification etc.) by looking at a distant telegraph pole against a background of bush (forest) with porros and roofs.
I concluded no
major difference that I could see, with the magnification dependent dof having far more bearing (as I said, an imperfect test).
Then (and so to the point of this little story) an Eagle popped in to view, and the thought occurred to me (o)< "if this 3D caper is such a ballyhoo, then why the bejaysus don't we see bops with eyes out on stalks, hammerhead style??!!" :eek!:
You would think such a serious matter as 3D binocular vision dependent survival would have sorted such an evolution out by now ..... then again, maybe not!
Chosun :gh:
