• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

Retrovid 7X35 a viable birding binocular? (1 Viewer)

So I've been using the Retrovid 7X35 for at least 90% of my birding for over two months. I've seen some good birds too! |=)|. I've had other binoculars in the Jeep but had no reason to change to anything else. I can only describe it's performance as excellent. I really can't find much if anything to fault. Overall I like it far more than I thought I would.

Good to hear.
All the best.
 
Chuck...I see that you are using this in the field quite a bit as of late with little problem. Now in your opening review you stated 'In the field impressions...
That FOCUS....as smooth as it gets quite frankly. Literally perfect function but it IS somewhat SLOW. Getting on a bird was fast and easy with a quick ID BUT...many times the bird would move before attaining perfect focus.".

To me...that would be a deal breaker. I have a Zeiss WEST GERMAN 7x42 and what a sharp pair of glasses and fun to view from. But the focus is slow due to focus wheel stiffness, size etc (older models in all glasses had this issue). So I relegate my birding with the 7x42 to the backyard as it is perfect for that. But out on the field, I want something that is a quick focus like my Zeiss HT's...

So...in the field as of late...have you noticed improvement in the quickness in focusing or are you just getting used to it? Oh, is that the recent leica or a previous one in manufacturing date? I note the new one appears to be solid and since I am looking for something along 8x30 or 8x32, this is an option...jim
 
Last edited:
So I've been using the Retrovid 7X35 for at least 90% of my birding for over two months. I've seen some good birds too! |=)|. I've had other binoculars in the Jeep but had no reason to change to anything else. I can only describe it's performance as excellent. I really can't find much if anything to fault. Overall I like it far more than I thought I would.

Close to 90 percent! Given the collection you have - that's quite a statistic!

gcole - I could see a Retrovid 8x32B appearing if the existing models sold well, but (apologies for having mentioned this before) L should really look hard at the business case for an updated 6x24. The need for longer eye relief will probably rule it out, but a 212m field of view and 4mm exit pupil with all the modern goodies (dieletric mirrors, phase-coated prisms, etc) in that tiny package would be something quite different from anything else on the market. It would only be 6x, sure, but there are enough 6.5xers out there to suggest that folks buy them.
 
Close to 90 percent! Given the collection you have - that's quite a statistic!

gcole - I could see a Retrovid 8x32B appearing if the existing models sold well, but (apologies for having mentioned this before) L should really look hard at the business case for an updated 6x24. The need for longer eye relief will probably rule it out, but a 212m field of view and 4mm exit pupil with all the modern goodies (dieletric mirrors, phase-coated prisms, etc) in that tiny package would be something quite different from anything else on the market. It would only be 6x, sure, but there are enough 6.5xers out there to suggest that folks buy them.

I have been looking for a good 6x power binocular for some time , but unfortunately nothing is available locally and purchasing over the internet is not an option.
Locally it seems that anything under 10x power is regarded as being wimpy o:D , 8x power binoculars are available though :t:.

Cheers.
 
personally I prefer the black Eloxal oxidized chrome finish to the paint finish anyway but Leica loves producing all these special editions. Interestingly the model you linked to is the digital M-P rather than the 35mm MP.

Tom, I prefer the black bodies, but was Nikon user in my film days.

As for special editions, I can't see the point of buying a camera that I would never use - as I suspect most, if not all, of these M-Ps never will be.
 
Close to 90 percent! Given the collection you have - that's quite a statistic!

gcole - I could see a Retrovid 8x32B appearing if the existing models sold well, but (apologies for having mentioned this before) L should really look hard at the business case for an updated 6x24. The need for longer eye relief will probably rule it out, but a 212m field of view and 4mm exit pupil with all the modern goodies (dieletric mirrors, phase-coated prisms, etc) in that tiny package would be something quite different from anything else on the market. It would only be 6x, sure, but there are enough 6.5xers out there to suggest that folks buy them.

A 6x power alpha by Leica or Swarovski I think would be very desirable and I certainly would purchase a updated 6x24
 
A 6X24 would be the perfect bin for a small % of potential customers, I am just saying that the demand for it would be too low for them to manufacture. They would be more apt to make a porro 8X30/32 IMO.

Andy W.
 
A 6X24 would be the perfect bin for a small % of potential customers, I am just saying that the demand for it would be too low for them to manufacture. They would be more apt to make a porro 8X30/32 IMO.

I fully agree. As it is, I'm still surprised they started making the Retrovids.

BTW, I'd love to know how many of those are actually sold.

Hermann
 
A 6x power alpha by Leica or Swarovski I think would be very desirable and I certainly would purchase a updated 6x24

I would rather have a 6x24 than the usual 8x25 small bin format just for the bigger exit pupil and brighter image.

A 6X24 would be the perfect bin for a small % of potential customers, I am just saying that the demand for it would be too low for them to manufacture. They would be more apt to make a porro 8X30/32 IMO.

Hi,

while I agree that a 6 power pocket is a nice format (and when I find my mislaid Papilio 6.5x again, I'll have one, albeit a bit on the chunky side).

But I'm not sure if just scaling an existing 8x25 design to 6x is going to be so easy - quite counterintuitively, the lower magnification and larger exit pupil will probably call for larger prisms - or limited field of view - which we certainly don't want...

Joachim
 
So I've been using the Retrovid 7X35 for at least 90% of my birding for over two months. I've seen some good birds too! |=)|. I've had other binoculars in the Jeep but had no reason to change to anything else. I can only describe it's performance as excellent. I really can't find much if anything to fault. Overall I like it far more than I thought I would.

Hi Chuck,

I haven't been keeping up with these "Retrovids."

Do they use Uppendahl prisms? I have enough binoculars with Schmidt/Pechan prisms.

Bob
 
Last edited:
More or less. Between the first announcement and the second there were downgrades to FOV, close focus distance and prism type.

Which doesn’t mean that they are in any way bad or sub par, of course. It seems that everybody who’s actually bought one thinks that they are extremely good!
 
Warning! This thread is more than 1 year ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top