• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

Gray-cheeked of another Catharus thrush? - Winnipeg, MB (1 Viewer)

khustochka

Well-known member
Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada; August 16, 2020

Lack of eye-ring makes Gray-cheeked Thrush my first guess.

But this is a species that is not too often seen at that season in Winnipeg (according to eBird). Also, the pictures are not very good unfortunately, and the bird seems juvenile, so I am not sure this is enough for the confident identification. But I also do not see anything that will be characteristic for a Swainson's or Hermit.

Is it at all possible to id, or it better remain Catharus sp.?

Thank you.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_3908-thrush.JPG
    IMG_3908-thrush.JPG
    189.9 KB · Views: 100
  • IMG_3911-thrush.JPG
    IMG_3911-thrush.JPG
    198.9 KB · Views: 62
That first picture is very conclusive for Gray-cheeked in my opinion.

I saw the same thing on eBird, too. Looks like the species is only starting migration there in late August, for the most part. If you use eBird, this would be a nice photographed record!
 
That first picture is very conclusive for Gray-cheeked in my opinion.

I saw the same thing on eBird, too. Looks like the species is only starting migration there in late August, for the most part. If you use eBird, this would be a nice photographed record!

birdmeister, thank you!

I also got a response from eBird reviewer, his suggestion is this is a Veery because of the weak spotting and buffy wash on the breast, and reddish upperparts.
 
On a closer second look, I agree with HeadWest. I focused too much on the face, but the muted and buffy chest spots favor Veery for sure. Apologies for misleading with my "confident" ID!
 
Warning! This thread is more than 4 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top