Both models spanned a significant period in terms of roof prism development, including:
• the introduction of phase coating
• the introduction of dielectric prism coating, and
• substantial development in the efficiency of multi-coating
Consequently, depending on when produced, performance will vary markedly in terms of:
• image sharpness (pre vs post phase coating)
• accuracy and intensity of colours (pre vs post dielectric coating, and the sophistication of the multi-coating), and
• overall image brightness (mainly the sophistication of the multi-coating)
For a quick overview of coating developments, see post #9 in the first link above
- - - -
SLC 8x30 performance . . .
Roger Vine has written in detail about SLC 8x30’s with dielectric prism coating *
See at:
http://www.scopeviews.co.uk/Swaro8x30WB.htm
Roger indicates that while the optical performance does not equal the best of current premium brand production
(would we reasonably expect that it could?), it does come close
That reflects my experience with my 2006 production SLC Neu 8x30, see my comments in post #7 in the third link above
And Roger's observation seems to be echoed by Andy
* Called Swarobright by Swarovski. By my observation of 8x30 box markings, dating from March 2003 at the latest: so from #D7312 xxxxx on
(add 1930 to the first two digits to determine the year of manufacture; the next two digits indicate the week from 01 to 52)
- - - -
Dialyt 8x30 performance . . .
The Dialyt was Zeiss’ premier product, built to their usual high standards, and Zeiss were the leaders in new coating technologies
One would expect that the optical performance of a dielectric coated Dialyt to be similar to that of a like coated SLC
- though Andy's experience seems to indicate otherwise *
(I have no idea in terms of numbering when dielectric coating was introduced on the Dialyt 8x30's)
What comments I have located about late production 8x30's (so with both dielectric coating and advanced multi-coating),
are generally favourable. See:
•
https://www.birdforum.net/opus/8x30_BGAT , and
•
https://www.birdforum.net/threads/z...-zeiss-8x30b-dialyt-first-impressions.268166/
* One possible reason could be because the Dialyt has a simpler eyepiece than the SLC:
Dialyt: 4 lenses in 3 groups (1, 2, 1)
SLC: 5 lenses in 4 groups (1, 1, 2, 1)
see the images in the links in the previous post
John