• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

Neotropic Cormorant? Toronto (1 Viewer)

mordovarot

Well-known member
Hi,

I've spotted two cormorants today in Toronto. Saw them together in flight first and the difference in size and tail lenght was significant. They lended and I went there to check them closer. I don't have enough experience with Neotropic, so need your help with that. One of the pictures on the water of Double-crested, for comparison of light conditions.
 

Attachments

  • 20210325-IMG_8973.jpg
    20210325-IMG_8973.jpg
    152.6 KB · Views: 50
  • 20210325-IMG_8987.jpg
    20210325-IMG_8987.jpg
    255.9 KB · Views: 50
  • 20210325-IMG_8989.jpg
    20210325-IMG_8989.jpg
    264.8 KB · Views: 33
  • 20210325-IMG_8991.jpg
    20210325-IMG_8991.jpg
    253.9 KB · Views: 34
  • 20210325-IMG_8992.jpg
    20210325-IMG_8992.jpg
    251.7 KB · Views: 37
  • 20210325-IMG_8997.jpg
    20210325-IMG_8997.jpg
    226.6 KB · Views: 50
I see a hint of yellow on the upper part of the lore, most obviously in pic 2 - which suggests double-crested cormorant. Mucking about with the photos would probably help.
 
I'm convinced. Despite the ambiguous photo #2, there's no way #1 is a double-crested: lores are clearly plain black. Mordovarot says he noticed a size and shape difference compared to double-crested cormorants that were in view at the same time, so I think both are neotropic.
 
As a follow up with a topic. Just found out that another, experienced birder, saw the bird independently and identified it also as a Neotropic. It proofs nothing but still... :) One more time many thanks to all who said the world to help me.
 
Warning! This thread is more than 3 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top