• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

New Maven Models (1 Viewer)

Upland

Well-known member
Updated B1 line:


New 50mm B6 line:

 
Just got the B.6 10x50.

The B.6 models (10x50, 12x50) are Maven's first binoculars with 50mm lenses; both models have impressive specs (here the ones for the 10x50):
  • AFOV 65 degrees
  • Transmission 94.75% (although not specified which wavelengths)
  • Eye relief 18.1 mm (I measured 15.5 mm usable eye relief from the rim of the eyecup, that's sufficient to easily see the field stop with my glasses on)
  • Near focus 2.3 m
  • weight 869 g
  • ED glass, magnesium body
  • Dielectric coating
  • Waterproof
  • Japanese components assembled in the US.

Immediate impression is very positive: nicely finished, mechanically impeccable (focus, diopter adjustment, eyecups), with a bright image, great central sharpness, very satisfactory off-axis sharpness, pleasant haptics, compact and lightweight (compared to other 10x50s). Will need to test more throughly (CA, stray-light, etc.) but this appears to be very good value for a its price!

I will write a comparison with other good 10x50s (UVHD+, EL SV, MeoStar, etc.) if I find time.

fwiw Canip
 

Attachments

  • IMG_8180r.jpg
    IMG_8180r.jpg
    997 KB · Views: 50
Just got the B.6 10x50.

The B.6 models (10x50, 12x50) are Maven's first binoculars with 50mm lenses; both models have impressive specs (here the ones for the 10x50):
  • AFOV 65 degrees
  • Transmission 94.75% (although not specified which wavelengths)
  • Eye relief 18.1 mm (I measured 15.5 mm usable eye relief from the rim of the eyecup, that's sufficient to easily see the field stop with my glasses on)
  • Near focus 2.3 m
  • weight 869 g
  • ED glass, magnesium body
  • Dielectric coating
  • Waterproof
  • Japanese components assembled in the US.

Immediate impression is very positive: nicely finished, mechanically impeccable (focus, diopter adjustment, eyecups), with a bright image, great central sharpness, very satisfactory off-axis sharpness, pleasant haptics, compact and lightweight (compared to other 10x50s). Will need to test more throughly (CA, stray-light, etc.) but this appears to be very good value for a its price!

I will write a comparison with other good 10x50s (UVHD+, EL SV, MeoStar, etc.) if I find time.

fwiw Canip
 
Nice, I just left their web site. I wonder why no customization option(amor) with these B.6’s ?
Give them some time to get the extra armor choices and other colored do-dads in stock in San Diego. I would imagine the priority was getting the binocular in stock and gettine a demo supply built up.
 
Give them some time to get the extra armor choices and other colored do-dads in stock in San Diego. I would imagine the priority was getting the binocular in stock and gettine a demo supply built up.
You are probably right. With the current shipping issues and with the Covid crisis the whole world has had to deal with, its even a surprise Maven has been so bold to market/introduce New products into their current line up of Optics. From your discussions here on your own Maven binoculars, these updated B1.2 / B.6 - must be real teasers.
 
Last edited:
I find the 10x50 very impressive. Review is in the writing …
I have a 10x50 B6 inbound. They sound pretty decent. Maven has been selling the new ones faster than they can stock them. I'm going to be real interested to see if the fov on these is also understate like everything else.
 
Just received my new Maven B1.2 8x42 today and wanted to provide an initial impressions report. These are just my initial subjective observations.

Price Point - retailing for $900 it is fairly well positioned in an extremely competitive market. Maven is direct-marketed and appears to be targeting themselves as having both high performance and value. Personally, I consider this the mid-priced, sub-alpha market - competing with the likes of Monarch HG, GPO Passion, Opticron Aurora VHD, Zeiss Conquest, Vortex Razor, etc. Probably the best value/performance binocular segment.

Packaging - Wow! Upon opening the shipping box I was disappointingly shocked. The binocular comes in a cheap/thin cardboard shell (like an egg-crate). There is also no included binocular case - just a cloth bag, strap and synthetic rubber lens covers. While some might say that’s just the wrapper the product comes in, it certainly does not inspire or exude an initial impression that the package contains a high-quality optical instrument. We’ll see.

Housing and Physical Characteristics - the B1.2 is very compact for an 8x42 binocular, in fact it is roughly the same size as my Monarch HG. Upon fist glance and handling the build quality appears excellent. The rubber armor is first-rate, very grippy, and has a more pleasant feel than that of the Zeiss Conquest. Found no obvious flaws with fit and finish. Ergonomically, the barrels have a nice contour that easily fit my medium-sized hands - they are slightly heavier (26.8oz) than my Monarch HGs (23.5oz) but the weight feels about right to stabilize my hold on this glass. All very good. If there was a physical characteristic negative - although recessed, the objective lenses did not appear as deeply recessed as most of my other binoculars.

Focus and Diopter Adjustment - the focus mechanism is exceptionally smooth with just the right amount of resistance. There is no play or spongy feel. Focus speed is fast - which is my preference in an 8x birding glass. The diopter does not lock but it is sufficiently stiff to avoid accidental readjustments. Played with the focus quite a bit and once set the diopter needed no further adjustment. Looks to be “set it and forget it.”

Eyepieces - multi-position with 3-click stops. They are covered with a similar synthetic rubber to the rest of the body and rested comfortably against my eyes. I don’t wear glasses and felt the eye-relief was fine. No blackouts or kidney-bean effect while glassing/panning. Only negative was the resistance when expanding/collapsing as I felt it was too light - may result in unintended adjustment.

View - sorry this section is not more detailed as I’ve only had an initial look and haven’t even taken them birding yet. Will certainly post again after I’ve used and them a bit. However, while I do not anticipate a wholesale replacement of my Victory SFs, there are no obvious flaws and the view satisfies. On first look, they are crisp and bright, with very good depth-of field and exceptional close-focus. With a 420ft FOV the view felt open and unrestrictive. Center-field resolution is quite sharp and while I’m uncertain if this model is supposed to be “flat-field,” they were fairly sharp across most of the image without pronounced edge distortion. Colors appear quite neutral - some may prefer more pop or warm/cool bias. Overall, I felt the view quite good, especially at this price point. Won’t give firm comparisons yet as the view is quite different from my everyday MHGs (trying to avoid bias toward the familiar).

Bottom Line - my initial impressions of the B1.2 are quite positive - solid build quality with an exceptional focus mechanism, very good ergonomics and handling, sharp and satisfying image with very good depth of field and neutral colors. Once a consumer gets over the initial horror of being sent a $900 optic in a cheap cardboard box, the experienced will realize a quality binocular was hidden inside.

Will use it a while and directly compare with my everyday Nikon Monarch HG 8x42 with a report at a later date.

A5514EC8-4A0F-4FA2-82CF-FF95325A688F.jpegB2967EF8-65ED-4620-9BA2-EC76EFEB283C.jpegDB1BB942-5B17-48F4-8AB0-491B80F8A159.jpeg1689E4EF-60CB-49AD-8550-86CA01E395EE.jpeg
 
Last edited:
There are supply chain shortages everywhere. Maven ships in what they can find to ship in. My B6 has the same crate. All others came in first class box style packages. The lack of a case has always been a standard, being replaced with the bag.
 
There are supply chain shortages everywhere. Maven ships in what they can find to ship in. My B6 has the same crate. All others came in first class box style packages. The lack of a case has always been a standard, being replaced with the bag.
Well Steve, if all that was taken from my review was crappy packaging, then I failed pretty miserably.

Suffice to say while packaging may be of lesser importance to experienced mid-grade and premium optics consumers, if it were my first purchase at this level I would have been horrified; and it most definitively would have given me serious doubts about the quality of the device. In addition, Maven is in direct competition with other brands that include premium packaging and cases commensurate with the brand image (even during the pandemic).

Again, packaging was not at all the point of sharing observations - I was just so stunned that I felt it was worth mentioning.
 
Maven can't even meet "new release" demand... They are sold out again, and I suspect they will continue to sell out through the end of the year... I'm excited for this comparo! This $1000 segment sure gets a lot of optical bang for the buck... with the Conquests, Kowas, Meoptas, HGs, GPOs, and new Maven/ Opticrons all going head to head.

And yes, it is shamefully wonky that the Mavens sell and ship without their up-charge cases. I dunno why they don't just add the cost of the case to the price of their binos and ship them together. Would still come in under $1000....
 
Well Steve, if all that was taken from my review was crappy packaging, then I failed pretty miserably.

Suffice to say while packaging may be of lesser importance to experienced mid-grade and premium optics consumers, if it were my first purchase at this level I would have been horrified; and it most definitively would have given me serious doubts about the quality of the device. In addition, Maven is in direct competition with other brands that include premium packaging and cases commensurate with the brand image (even during the pandemic).

Again, packaging was not at all the point of sharing observations - I was just so stunned that I felt it was worth mentioning.
I must admit I have received my share of New optics that have came in very questionable packaging over the years and it does make one wonder about the quality of an item before you even get to pull it out of its shipping box. My Maven 6x30 special order I received early in the Pandemic took months to get to me. It came in a very durable first class box, with plenty of packaging /protection and also housed in a very classy Maven box. This set the thought right away in my mind before I even handled the Binoculars, that these would be high quality. In my case with my first purchase from Maven with the 6x30, they ended up being top notch and I know it was not just because of how or what packaging they chose to ship them in but it does mentally set the tone upfront of whether your purchase will be a negative or positive one. So yes AlphaFan, it’s worth mentioning.
 
Well Steve, if all that was taken from my review was crappy packaging, then I failed pretty miserably.

Suffice to say while packaging may be of lesser importance to experienced mid-grade and premium optics consumers, if it were my first purchase at this level I would have been horrified; and it most definitively would have given me serious doubts about the quality of the device. In addition, Maven is in direct competition with other brands that include premium packaging and cases commensurate with the brand image (even during the pandemic).

Again, packaging was not at all the point of sharing observations - I was just so stunned that I felt it was worth mentioning.
Well I guess I've been told off.

To be clear, I took every single point of your review. I will point out that it was you who made packaging the obvious major point of the review. Like Gwen said, I agree it is worth mentioning. My point was to mention that while the packaging we both received with new Maven binoculars was the same egg crate, it is not typical of Maven packaging and may not be what we see when supply chain issues settle down.. Supply chain issues are also why there is no B 3.1 just yet.

Sorry you had to take offense, none was intended.
 
Naw Steve. You are fine. From my armchair I don’t read it as AlphaFan as telling you off, and I don’t read any of this as him taking offense either. I’m not trying to referee here. All of us posting in here appreciate Mavens for the value, quality, and certain attributes they bring to the table.

I have personally used your extensive reviews, and the freely shared opinions of gcole and canip and AlphaFan to inform and guide my own purchases of 2 mavens and a zulu9. I couldn’t care less that they aren’t “alpha’s” or cost $2500… they do what I need them to at a price I can afford.

I’m hoping to acquire a B1.2 10x42 next, pending positive reviews from ALL of you on this forum. Thank you for sharing your thoughts, experiences, opinions. Let’s keep that going! :)
 
Drew is spot on. I took no offense and wasn’t attempting to give any - it really serves no useful purpose. If it came across otherwise, my bad. Also agree that we are all enriched by the community of generous folks who take the time to share information and observations here. Happy to be part of it.
 
Last edited:
I have concluded that I have been in a worse mood over the summer than I thought. I suppose there are lots of reasons for that but I need to heed my late Grandmother's advice..."Sonny, don't let your mood effect your manners". So now we all seem to be in the same general place, I will endeavor to avoid posts like that one.

Now if this infernal smoke (one of the reasons for my foul mood) will ever clear up enough to see maybe I can get into a review of the B6. That might not happen till November, or if we don't get a wetter winter this year than last, it might never happen.

Cheers
 
Steve I think you live in a very special beautiful part of our country. The smoke you are experiencing is it from Nevada or California forest fires or both ? If I could go back in time, the early fifties would be the time I would have loved to have traveled/experienced your part of the USA. Now due to the current climate changes … between the droughts, mud slides , flooding, forest fires, jumping into that old station wagon and driving thru the western part of the USA really takes some serious planing. Oh well, even if I could have somehow managed to get behind the steering wheel of my dads old station wagon, my feet never would have been able to reach the gas pedal.
 
Gwen, we're surrounded by fire, 400,000 acres of contained, but still burning internally Bootleg Fire, the Patton Meadow Complex , both to the east of us, the 600,000 acre Dixe Fire and the 200,000 acre Caldor fire to the south. Much closer to us in the south is the 10,000 acre Antelope Fire. There is a Fire complex to the north around the town of Oakridge, so whichever way the wind blows, we get smoke. However the fires to the south in Ca are the worst contributors. Most fire officials are saying it will take the onset of winter to put it all out. Problem is, there needs to be an actual winter for that to happen.

The Bootleg Fire did provide some serious pyrocummulus formations The clouds in the photos are about 60 miles away. Sometimes as many as 7 of those pyrocumulus formations were visible. Those topped out at airliner height. That week in July was about the last clear days we've had.
 

Attachments

  • 20210708_185349.jpg
    20210708_185349.jpg
    4.5 MB · Views: 17
  • 20210710_192314.jpg
    20210710_192314.jpg
    1.1 MB · Views: 17
Warning! This thread is more than 3 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top