• BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is absolutely FREE!

    Register for an account to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.

Recent content by mikenott

  1. mikenott

    Ultra lightweight gimbal head?

    I agree.... mostly! Still spend quite a bit of time (four hours+) in hides and putting it down can lead to missing those moments".
  2. mikenott

    Ultra lightweight gimbal head?

    Still looking into this. There isn't an ultra lightweight gimbal head that I can find and the best option (for me!) seems to be the Flexshooter pro mini except it is so expensive (approx. £520). Still looking (and negotiating with the wife :D:D ).
  3. mikenott

    Ultra lightweight gimbal head?

    Thx for suggestions. I just don't get on with monopods and monogimbal not really suited to tripod. Done some research and my 4G Mongoose 3.6 is still the lightest around at 1.5lb/0.68kg (which is why I bought it), so may have to accept the bulk and benefit from the weight saving. Funny there are...
  4. mikenott

    Ultra lightweight gimbal head?

    I am gradually moving to lightweight gear (old age and my arms now drag on ground due to carrying 1Dxii/600 f4 :D) but still need to use a tripod from time to time (waiting around, hide shots) - my Gitzo tripod and 4G gimbal head are far too heavy duty and my small ball joint head is too sloppy...
  5. mikenott

    So is the Canon R5 a bird photography body?

    Reason I ask is that I have always had my IS on. Interesting exchanges elsewhere (e.g. here https://www.facebook.com/groups/canonr5/permalink/460824385124921 where some people are saying IS off in certain circumstances. Just wondered if I just blindly follow what I expect to be the best rather...
  6. mikenott

    So is the Canon R5 a bird photography body?

    As there is a bit of focus(sic) on birds in flight, what's the consensus here on image stabilisation on or off for BIF on the R5 (+RF100-500?)
  7. mikenott

    New bird photographer

    Agree with advice to go MkII - not least because to some extent you are future-proofing yourself if you decide to upgrade your camera body at some stage. The MkII works extremely well with all bodies up to and including the new R5 (with an adapter).
  8. mikenott

    So is the Canon R5 a bird photography body?

    My understanding is the same. Physical/mechanical interlocks, not software. Never mind. I'll just wait or the 24-600 f2 isviiii drone version :smoke:
  9. mikenott

    So is the Canon R5 a bird photography body?

    Important: Canon R5 and the RF 100-500 PLUS RF 1.4x I found this info whilst looking at the RF100-500 and RF1.4x Extender combo. It significantly affected my (personal!) decision, so I thought I would share. The RF1.4x can only be used with the RF100-500 when the zoom is greater than 300mm...
  10. mikenott

    So is the Canon R5 a bird photography body?

    Very nice images, especially of the Little Owls. Still waiting for my R5 (late ordering).
  11. mikenott

    So is the Canon R5 a bird photography body?

    This guy seems to talk a lot of sense: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5vyq304j4wE
  12. mikenott

    So is the Canon R5 a bird photography body?

    One aspect that intrigues me is the possibility of taking stills from video. I have experimented with this on my 1Dii + 600 f4 but single frame resolution was not too good. But with 8K video, images may be comparable to a 20 megapixel still camera? Also seen some videos showing the eye tracking...
  13. mikenott

    So is the Canon R5 a bird photography body?

    Now all the specifications are out, just wondered what the thoughts were on whether the R5 is a good bird photography body. See many good things so where does it fit in the Canon 1Dx iII/II, 5D IV and 7DII spectrum? Would you like to own one .......... and will you?
Top