davidhunternyc
Member
Hello,
My name is David and I live in NYC. I've been a novice birder for a few years. I mostly feed birds off of my 3rd floor apartment fire escape. My apartment faces Fort Tryon Park directly across the street. It's a natural park, most of it the way it was when George Washington built a fort there in 1776. I'm often in the park and I enjoy watching birds there. Sometimes I go to Central Park too. Most of all I enjoy standing on my balcony and looking at the various birds in the tree canopy. I've enclosed a couple of photos of what the park looks like from my balcony. I used an iPhone to take the photos and it appears further away then it is. It's really only about 50 yards across the street from my balcony.
Since Covid I've wanted to get a monocular or binoculars to bird watch. The problem is that I don't know which to buy, even after reading reviews and watching YouTube videos. I'm hoping all of you experts would give me suggestions, even if your ideas are not about the two options I've listed here. So why did I choose the Leica Monovid and Swarovski NL Pure? To be blunt, I'm a design snob. Yes, I'm sorry, I'm shallow but beautiful design is important to me. Also, the price point between these two options is exhorbitant. Price isn't an issue for me, however. I just want to find the best option for my needs. The other reason is that, despite the differences, both the Leica and the Swarovski are said to have brilliant optics.
I know the NL-Pure is the new kid on the block and everyone seems to be drooling for them. Since I've never used high-end binoculars in my life, I have no idea. The NL-Pure is said to be the best-of-the-best and so I want to consider them. They are small and they are stunning to behold, an engineering and design masterpiece. My reservation is, are they overkill for standing on my balcony just to see a cardinal across the street? I could see why people would want the best binoculars in the wilderness but I'm not sure how necessary they are for looking at birds in a park, but what do I know...
Then there's the Leica Monovid. After all of this time this monocular still gets superlative reviews. It seems like a perfect little monocular. Besides looking at birds in the park I could use the Monovid while laying in bed to look at the finches, blue jays, and mockingbirds through my open window on my fire escape. Even though the birds are literally 5 feet away I could use the Monovid to look at fine details on these little creatures. Also, I've read about how much easier it is to make monoculars than binoculars. I don't care that I have to close one eye. Optics and details trumps all. The problem is, would I get tired of the Monovid after a while and wish I had the NL-Pure?
A couple of more considerations. I wear glasses. I am far-sighted and I wear glasses for reading. I have a feeling the Monovid's eye opening will be too small to be used optimally while wearing glasses. Is it the same with the NL-Pure? The other thing about me is that I get motion sickness very easily. I can't use binoculars without getting sick really quickly and that's why I haven't bought any so far. Maybe I need to stick with it and build my binocular legs, so to speak. Which of these two are least likely to make me sick? I think the Monovid would be better. I don't get sick when I use a camera, for instance. What are your thoughts?
These are two of the best options I've found. I've researched Zeiss and some other manufacturers but none seem to be as well designed as Leica and Swarovski. I could be wrong. Your help is appreciated. Thank you.
My name is David and I live in NYC. I've been a novice birder for a few years. I mostly feed birds off of my 3rd floor apartment fire escape. My apartment faces Fort Tryon Park directly across the street. It's a natural park, most of it the way it was when George Washington built a fort there in 1776. I'm often in the park and I enjoy watching birds there. Sometimes I go to Central Park too. Most of all I enjoy standing on my balcony and looking at the various birds in the tree canopy. I've enclosed a couple of photos of what the park looks like from my balcony. I used an iPhone to take the photos and it appears further away then it is. It's really only about 50 yards across the street from my balcony.
Since Covid I've wanted to get a monocular or binoculars to bird watch. The problem is that I don't know which to buy, even after reading reviews and watching YouTube videos. I'm hoping all of you experts would give me suggestions, even if your ideas are not about the two options I've listed here. So why did I choose the Leica Monovid and Swarovski NL Pure? To be blunt, I'm a design snob. Yes, I'm sorry, I'm shallow but beautiful design is important to me. Also, the price point between these two options is exhorbitant. Price isn't an issue for me, however. I just want to find the best option for my needs. The other reason is that, despite the differences, both the Leica and the Swarovski are said to have brilliant optics.
I know the NL-Pure is the new kid on the block and everyone seems to be drooling for them. Since I've never used high-end binoculars in my life, I have no idea. The NL-Pure is said to be the best-of-the-best and so I want to consider them. They are small and they are stunning to behold, an engineering and design masterpiece. My reservation is, are they overkill for standing on my balcony just to see a cardinal across the street? I could see why people would want the best binoculars in the wilderness but I'm not sure how necessary they are for looking at birds in a park, but what do I know...
Then there's the Leica Monovid. After all of this time this monocular still gets superlative reviews. It seems like a perfect little monocular. Besides looking at birds in the park I could use the Monovid while laying in bed to look at the finches, blue jays, and mockingbirds through my open window on my fire escape. Even though the birds are literally 5 feet away I could use the Monovid to look at fine details on these little creatures. Also, I've read about how much easier it is to make monoculars than binoculars. I don't care that I have to close one eye. Optics and details trumps all. The problem is, would I get tired of the Monovid after a while and wish I had the NL-Pure?
A couple of more considerations. I wear glasses. I am far-sighted and I wear glasses for reading. I have a feeling the Monovid's eye opening will be too small to be used optimally while wearing glasses. Is it the same with the NL-Pure? The other thing about me is that I get motion sickness very easily. I can't use binoculars without getting sick really quickly and that's why I haven't bought any so far. Maybe I need to stick with it and build my binocular legs, so to speak. Which of these two are least likely to make me sick? I think the Monovid would be better. I don't get sick when I use a camera, for instance. What are your thoughts?
These are two of the best options I've found. I've researched Zeiss and some other manufacturers but none seem to be as well designed as Leica and Swarovski. I could be wrong. Your help is appreciated. Thank you.