• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

Emberiza (1 Viewer)


October 2021
October 25

Emberizidae — Old World Buntings: I'm now using the phylogeny of Päckert et al. (2020b), rather than Päckert et al. (2015). As a result, I've divided Emberizidae into 4 subfamilies. Of them, only Emberizinae has a name under ICZN rules. I'm using the informal terms Melophinae, Fringillariinae, and Schoeniclinae for the other three. These subfamilies have the same composition as the same clades previously had. However, their order has changed.
[Emberizidae, Core Passeroidea, 3.06]

New Emberizid genera: With genera becoming subfamilies, more genera are in order. The generic divisions are based on three principles. They must be (1) based on the phylogeny, (2) roughly 5-10 million years old, and (3) form groups that are as coherent as possible. This involved adding 11 genera. Two lack names, and have been given temporary designations in quotes. Here are the new genera:

"Melophus": Brown-rumped Bunting, Melophus affinis, is transferred from Melophus to "Melophus".
Granativora: Black-headed Bunting, Melophus melanocephalus, and Red-headed Bunting, Melophus bruniceps, are transferred from Melophus to Granativora (GR Gray, 1855, type melanocephalus).
Miliaria: Corn Bunting, Emberiza calandra, is transferred from Emberiza to Miliaria (Brehm 1828, monotypic).
Spina: Chestnut-eared Bunting, Emberiza fucata, is transferred from Emberiza to Spina (Kaup 1829, monotypic).
"Emberiza": Tibetan Bunting, Emberiza koslowi, is transferred from Emberiza to "Emberiza".
Cia: Jankowski's Bunting, Emberiza jankowskii, through Godlewski's Bunting, Emberiza godlewskii, are transferred from Emberiza to Cia (Kaup 1829, type cia).
Glycyspina: Gray-necked Bunting, Emberiza buchanani, through Cretzschmar's Bunting, Emberiza caesia, are transferred from Emberiza to Glycyspina (Cabanis 1851, type hortulana).
Polymitra: Cabanis's Bunting, Fringillaria cabanisi, Golden-breasted Bunting, Fringillaria flaviventris, and Somali Bunting Fringillaria poliopleura, are transferred from Fringillaria to Polymitra (Cabanis 1851, type flaviventris).
Cristemberiza: Yellow-throated Bunting, Schoeniclus elegans, is transferred to Cristemberiza (Momiyama 1928, monotypic).
Latoucheornis: Slaty Bunting, Schoeniclus siemsseni, is transferred to Latoucheornis (Bangs 1931, monotypic).
Orospina: Rustic Bunting, Schoeniclus rustica, through Gray Bunting, Schoeniclus variabilis, are transferred to Orospina (Kaup 1829, type rustica).
[Emberizidae, Core Passeroidea, 3.06]

Sharpe's Bunting: I added the second English name Yunnan Bunting (HBW Illustrated Checklist) to Sharpe's Bunting, Cia yunnanensis.
[Emberizidae, Core Passeroidea, 3.06]
 
Polymitra: Cabanis's Bunting, Fringillaria cabanisi, Golden-breasted Bunting, Fringillaria flaviventris, and Somali Bunting Fringillaria poliopleura, are transferred from Fringillaria to Polymitra (Cabanis 1851, type flaviventris).
I was just looking at this.

The Key to Scientific Names has capensis as the type of Polymitra, making it a junior synonym of Fringillaria. The golden-breasted group would then be called Cosmospina Wolters, 1972.

Anyone know who is correct?
 
I was just looking at this.

The Key to Scientific Names has capensis as the type of Polymitra, making it a junior synonym of Fringillaria. The golden-breasted group would then be called Cosmospina Wolters, 1972.

Anyone know who is correct?
In my opinion, E. affinis belongs to the genus Cosmospina
 
Polymitra is a purist substitute for Fringillaria, hence an objective junior synonym of the latter by definition.
Spina and Orospina are both problematic IMO (type species unidentifiable, and very unlikely to have been the taxonomic species they have been used for in recent times).

My current notes say -


name : Polymitra​
author : Cabanis​
year : 1851​
OD reference : Cabanis J. 1850-51. Museum heineanum. Verzeichniss der ornithologischen Sammlung des Oberamtmann Ferdinand Heine, auf Gut St. Burchard vor Halberstadt. I. Theil, die Singvögel enthaltend. R Frantz, Halberstadt.​
page : 129​
included nominal species : Polymitra flaviventris (syn. capensis, xanthogaster, bicincta, quinquevittata), P. striolata, P. capistrata, P. flavigastra, P. septemstriata​
type species : Emberiza capensis Linnaeus 1766​
type species valid syn. : in use​
fixation by : replacement name​
fixation ref : see original name​
page : see original name​
fixation link : see original name​
type OD ref : Linné C a. 1766. Systema naturae : per regna tria natura, secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis. Editio duodecima, reformata. Tomus I. Laurentius Salvius, Stockholm.​
page : 310​
notes : New name for Fringillaria Swainson 1837 (purism). “Polymitra *) Bindenammer. Fringillaria (!) Sws. 1837. [...] *) Von πολύς, viel und μίτρα, Kopfbinde. –”​
ICZN : n/a​
online publication : n/a​
available : yes​
status : extant​
family : Emberizidae​
name : Fringillaria​
author : Swainson​
year : 1837​
OD reference : Swainson W. 1837. On the natural history and classification of birds. Vol. II. In: Lardner D [ed]. The cabinet cyclopaedia. Longman, Rees, Orme, Brown, Green, & Longman, London.​
page : 124, 289​
included nominal species : Fringillaria capensis, F. striolata, F. caesia, [F. rufa, F. vittata, F. anthoides – nomina nuda]​
type species : Emberiza capensis Linnaeus 1766​
type species valid syn. : in use​
fixation by : subsequent designation​
fixation ref : Gray GR. 1840. A list of the genera of birds, with an indication of the typical species of each genus. R and JE Taylor, London.​
page : 47​
type OD ref : Linné C a. 1766. Systema naturae : per regna tria natura, secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis. Editio duodecima, reformata. Tomus I. Laurentius Salvius, Stockholm.​
page : 310​
notes : As a subgenus of Emberiza.​
ICZN : n/a​
online publication : n/a​
available : yes​
status : extant​
family : Emberizidae​
name : Spina​
author : Kaup​
year : 1829​
OD reference : Kaup JJ. 1829. Skizzirte Entwickelungs-Geschichte und natürliches System der europäischen Thierwelt. Erster Theil, welcher die Vogelsäugethiere und Vögel nebst Andeutung der Entstehung der letzteren aus Amphibien enthält. CW Leske, Darmstadt & Leipzig.​
page : 153, 192​
included nominal species : Emberiza lesbia​
type species : Emberiza lesbia Gmelin 1789​
type species valid syn. : nomen dubium, cf. Emberiza cia Linnaeus 1766​
fixation by : monotypy​
fixation ref : as OD​
page : as OD​
fixation link : as OD​
type OD ref : Linnaeus C, Gmelin JF. 1789. Systema naturæ per regna tria naturæ, secundum classes, ordines, genera, species; cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis. Edicio decima tertia, aucta, reformata. Tomus primus, pars II. GE Beer, Leipzig.​
page : 882​
notes : Type species name based on “le Mitilene de Provence” of Buffon Histoire naturelle des oiseaux , pl. enl. 656, fig. 1, t.7 - Planches enluminées d'histoire naturelle - Biodiversity Heritage Library . Has been treated as a synonym of, at least, Emberiza pusilla Pallas 1776, E. rustica Pallas 1776, E. fucata Pallas 1776 and E. aureola Pallas 1773; the description (three thin black lines on the head, separated by white; rufous rump) is more suggestive of E. cia Linnaeus 1766 to me. Buffon also said that this bird's call acted as a warning for other birds at the approach of a predator (and that it was kept in cages near farm-yards on Lesbos, for this reason); and that it would be known in Provence as ‘chic de mitilene’ or ‘chic’ (the latter being the Provençal name of Emberiza cirlus Linnaeus 1766).​
ICZN : n/a​
online publication : n/a​
available : yes​
status : extant​
family : Emberizidae​
name : Orospina​
author : Kaup​
year : 1829​
OD reference : Kaup JJ. 1829. Skizzirte Entwickelungs-Geschichte und natürliches System der europäischen Thierwelt. Erster Theil, welcher die Vogelsäugethiere und Vögel nebst Andeutung der Entstehung der letzteren aus Amphibien enthält. CW Leske, Darmstadt & Leipzig.​
page : 154, 192​
included nominal species : Emberiza provincialis​
type species : Emberiza provincialis Gmelin 1789​
type species valid syn. : nomen dubium, cf. Fringilla schoeniclus Linnaeus 1758​
fixation by : monotypy​
fixation ref : as OD​
page : as OD​
fixation link : as OD​
type OD ref : Linnaeus C, Gmelin JF. 1789. Systema naturæ per regna tria naturæ, secundum classes, ordines, genera, species; cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis. Edicio decima tertia, aucta, reformata. Tomus primus, pars II. GE Beer, Leipzig.​
page : 881​
notes : Type species name based on “le Gavoué de Provence” of Buffon Histoire naturelle des oiseaux , pl. enl. 656, fig. 2, t.7 - Planches enluminées d'histoire naturelle - Biodiversity Heritage Library . Has been treated as a synonym of, at least, Emberiza fucata Pallas 1776, E. aureola Pallas 1773, and Fringilla schoeniclus Linnaeus 1758. The latter more probable in my opinion. Senior homonym of Orospina Cabanis 1883 (Thraupidae).​
ICZN : n/a​
online publication : n/a​
available : yes​
status : extant​
family : Emberizidae​
 
Last edited:
sort of surprised that the Emberiza get carved up into different subfamilies, while the Arremonidae are still just given tribes. Admittedly, I am more familiar with the latter being a US-based birder, but I have always got a sense that the different "tribes" are more coherent and distinguishable from each other than the different members of Emberiza.
 
Isn't the reason that the relationships between the seven tribes are uncertain so they held off on the subfamilies. I suppose they considered seven subfamilies too many.
 
Bao, W., Kathait, A., Li, X., Ozaki, K., Hanada, Y., Thomas, A., Carey, G.J., Gou, J., Davaasuren, B., Hasebe, M., Holt, P.I., Pelikan, L., Fan, Z., Wang, S., and Xing, X. (2022) Subspecies taxonomy and inter-population divergences of the critically endangered Yellow-Breasted Bunting: evidence from song variations. Animals 12: 2292. Published: 4 September 2022
Subspecies Taxonomy and Inter-Population Divergences of the Critically Endangered Yellow-Breasted Bunting: Evidence from Song Variations

Simple Summary
Identifying the taxonomic status of subspecies or population with independent evolutionary tendencies is important for the targeted conservation of endangered species. Two subspecies of the critically endangered, Yellow-breasted Bunting Emberiza aureola have long been classified: E. a. aureola and E. a. ornata. However, populations distributed in Hokkaido, Japan, are sometimes considered another subspecies of E. a. insularis. By comparing vocal divergences, we found that the song of the Yellow-breasted Bunting Emberiza aureola has subspecies-specific properties and that insularis can be classified acoustically as a subspecies. Morphological and genetic differences should be tested further to confirm its subspecies status. Our results not only confirm the subspecies but also provide key evidence for targeted taxon conservation efforts for this critically endangered bird species, given that several Japanese populations have disappeared.

Abstract
The critically endangered Yellow-breasted Bunting has undergone population collapse globally because of illegal hunting and habitat deterioration. It was listed as critically endangered (CR) by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) in 2017 and designated a Class I (highest level) national conservation bird species in China in 2021. Birdsong in the breeding season is the main communicative signal under sexual selection, and song variations have long been considered critical evidence of divergence among subspecies or populations. We compared the songs of 89 males from 18 populations to test subspecies taxonomy. We found that songs of the Yellow-breasted Bunting Emberiza aureola are subspecies specific and that three subspecies can be clearly discriminated by song divergences. Moreover, an analysis of multiple vocal traits supports the claim that insularis is distinct from aureola and ornata. Finally, at the geographic population level, populations can be clearly classified in accordance with the three subspecies, although the aureola population in Xinjiang, China is differentiated from other populations of the same subspecies. The results of this study demonstrate that all populations and subspecies are unique and should be protected to maintain intraspecies song diversity. In addition, several specific populations, such as insularis populations in Japan and the Xinjiang, China population of aureola, need to be paid special attention to prevent the extinction of unique or local taxa.
 

Li, J., Song, G., Chen, G., Liu, N., Dong, L., & Bao, X. (2022). A new bunting species in South China revealed by an integrative taxonomic investigation of the Emberiza godlewskii complex (Aves, Emberidae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 107697.

Species boundaries of birds across the Euro-Asian continent, especially the widely distributed passerines with multiple subspecies, are not completely resolved. The Rock Bunting complex, Emberiza cia and E. godlewskii, is subject to ongoing debate due to geographic variation in its morphology, and deep genetic splits. In this study, the phylogenetic relationships of the E. cia/godlewskii complex were evaluated based on multilocus coalescence methods combined with analyses of plumage color and morphological variation. Although the northern and southern populations of E. godlewski formed reciprocally monophyletic groups, the northern E. godlewskii clade is the sister group to E. cia, rendering E. godlewskii as currently defined paraphyletic. The significant differences in morphometry and plumage color reflectance are complementary and support the phenotypic validity of northern and southern E. godlewskii. Thus, we recommend the following taxonomic revisions: the northern and southern E. godlewskii subspecies should be recognized as different full species, such as E. godlewskii and E. yunnanensis, respectively. This resolves the issue that E. godlewskii, as currently defined, is paraphyletic. Our research provides direct evidence of cryptic species in old world buntings and highlights the underestimation of species diversity in birds in East Asia.
 
Is there a range map of the northern and southern subspecies groups of E godlewski?
It's interesting they put styani in the southern group, whereas this was synonymised with omissa (which is in the northern group) in Byers, Olsson, Curson Buntings & Sparrows.
I am not particularly struck by any visual differences when comparing photos...
 
It's interesting they put styani in the southern group, whereas this was synonymised with omissa (which is in the northern group) in Byers, Olsson, Curson Buntings & Sparrows.
I am not particularly struck by any visual differences when comparing photos...
Clive Byers told me that examining drawer after drawer of museum bunting specimens left him somewhat numb as an artist...!😮😲🤫
MJB
 
Aaaah. When Google translated MJB's comment, I didn't really understand the meaning 😅
This story starts with an image of specimen drawers:
Niels
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top