BirdForum

BirdForum (https://www.birdforum.net/index.php)
-   Bird Identification Q&A (https://www.birdforum.net/forumdisplay.php?f=114)
-   -   Pipits, Northern Thailand (https://www.birdforum.net/showthread.php?t=353317)

Gibbo 92 Saturday 11th November 2017 01:29

Pipits, Northern Thailand
 
5 Attachment(s)
Hello,

I have 2 different birds here;

The first three pictures I think are Paddyfield Pipit seen near Chiang Mai,

I am not so sure on the last two images which I saw at Sukhothai.

Many Thanks,

Chris

Gibbo 92 Friday 24th November 2017 02:26

5 Attachment(s)
Hello,

I also have some more Pipits seen at Kanchanaburi, Thailand.

These are again two different birds, these looked different to the previous pipits encountered on my trip.

Many Thanks

Chris

andyb39 Friday 24th November 2017 08:19

Chris, you said the second set shows two individuals. Which is which?

Gibbo 92 Friday 24th November 2017 21:11

Hi,

The first pipit seen is in the first three images and the second in the last two.



Chris

andyb39 Saturday 25th November 2017 02:19

First of all, when dealing with the three large pipits, I can't recommend this web article highly enough.

https://digdeep1962.wordpress.com/20...s-in-malaysia/

in the first set, I agree the first bird is Paddyfield.

The second is more difficult as it appears to have pale lores. In the first image, the bird reminds me a little of Blyth's, but as this is a vagrant to Thailand, we 'd better rule that out. In any case, in the second image, we can see the crown is only faintly streaked, and there's an apparent contrast between the warm buff of the breast and the paler belly. The bill looks relatively thin and weak and it's not like Richard's to perch on a bush.

In the second set, if you're sure the first three images show the same bird, the bird has to be a Paddyfield - distinct loral stripe, long thin bill, flat crown, gingery flanks. This looks like an an immature bird as it seems to be retaining some juvenile plumage features - there are some images of this on the web page.

The second bird is more difficult, as the bill is stronger and even looks slightly curved in 5390. The lores look pale, although there's a hint of a faint stripe. The underparts are a cold white in tone, apparently lacking the gingery wash on the flanks. However, the cheek looks solid and warmly-coloured and the crown isn't well-streaked. Richard's also favours longer grass or vegetation and doesn't normally strut around on a lawn like this. So I think I would go for Paddyfield again.

As Dave Bakewell points out, call is the best way to distinguish these pipits.


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:08.

Powered by vBulletin®, copyright ©2000 - 2018 vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
BirdForum Ltd 2002 - 2018