• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Feel the intensity, not your equipment. Maximum image quality. Minimum weight. The new ZEISS SFL, up to 30% less weight than comparable competitors.

Reviews by kwikstaart

Recommended
Yes
Price
0$
Pros
Cons
After about 4 years (and not 10 as I hoped ;-)) I traded this one in for a new Nikon EDG (II) 8x42). Please see my review over there. In short: richer colors (Zeiss almost too bright, too white), sahrper, handling, focusknow.
Recommended
Yes
Price
1900$
Pros
  • Wonderfull view, perfect focus knob, solid housing, price compared to others,
Cons
  • warranty too short
When looking for my new binoculars I knew that the Swarovison EL and this Nikon EDG were the ones to look at. I love the image provided by field flattener lenses and I knew I wanted a magnification of 8x. I didnt want Zeiss as I owned a pair of Victorys FL build in 2008 (with Lotutec). Of course these a very good optics but I had the opportunity to get a new pair and I knew that there were birders looking through better binoculars and as I just love a good view even of normal birds, this was the time to buy. Another good reason was that I kept telling myself that bins couldn't get any better than SW EL and that this one would serve the rest of my life (yeah right o:D)

Why did I choose this one? First of all, the Nikon and the Swarovski to me are very much a like: perfect ergonomics and balance, the best of the best optics, field flattener lenses providing excellent views which are sharp from adge to edge and the tests on allbinos.com show that they are outstanding. So it was either one of these. In my opinion there a few differences: the SW looks just a hair sharper which seems only visible on greater distance... but... the Nikon offers the smoothest focussing I ever met and the rolling ball effect is minimal. Tests also show they have less CA but i haven't noticed that. I knew this focussing feature from a previous pair of HGL's but now it seems even better. The SW seems a rough focusser, even a bit shocky. The other objective reason was that the Nikon was about $ 600 cheaper at my dealer. Not the main reason if you buy such an expensive pair but still.

In all other aspects they are very much a like but the accessoires with the Nikon are high class: one very fine neckstrap and eyepieceholders to block sunshine (not with glasses). The biggest advantage of the SW are the warranty and service, known in The Netherlands as the best of the best. Another plus for SW is the water repellant coating, which is not on the EDG.

The more subjective reasons for me to buy the Nikon are: the Nikon is just a specialty over here (SW is the marketleader by far) and Nikon just makes a bit less explicit advertisement for hunting. That's also the reason I didn't want to wait for the new Zeiss HT's.

Now, am I happy with it: after a few weeks the answer is a fullhearty YES. They just feel so natural, the view really grips you and takes IN the picture. The big FOV takes my breath away everytime I look through it. It offers rich colours, free of CA and very fine details. My former Fl's seemed to be too bright, this is warmer and feels more natural especially when looking at birds in the sky or above the see. I just see better colours and colour""borders".

So, the main reasons to choose this one above it's main rival form Austria is the focusknob: PERFECT: quick, no hesitation or any doubt: just wheel it and the picture snaps into perfect focus. With enough "friction" but sooo smooth. And the lesser rolling ball effect.

So yes, I recommend everyone looking for th alpha bins to put this one on the shortlist. You can't go wrong, you save a lot of money (e.g. for a trip) and you know you have the best of the best for many years to come.

UPDATE after 4 weeks: it's still the best buy in terms of optics, ergonomics and of course the focusser, which is still the best. There is a "but" though: in my piece the diopter moves undeliberatley. it's not much but it does and I have figured out how this comes: if you press too hard on the focusknob when focussing then the diopter moves so it seems to be in the construction. Please try this before buying, and it's not in every piece.Before returning it I try to adjust my pressure on the focusser and will keep you posted.

UPDATE (June, 20, 2012) After 3 months using this bino intensely I am still very, very pleased with it. The ease of use in ergonomics and especially the ideal focussing combined with the rich, brilliant, clear and very true views still amazes me. I really feel I am IN the picture instead of looking AT it. I haven't experienced the diopterproblem again, just only sometimes I have to re-adjust it a millimeter.

IMHO this binoculars deserve a lot more attention, especially here in The Netherlands where birders buy Swaro "just to be sure" and without comparing. Once again the advantages versus Swaovision: -lower price, smoothest and best focussing in the world, view and edge-sharpness alike, ergonomics very fine, accessories excellent! Still the Swaro has the ultimate service I think and that's worth something although a friend of mine who owns a Swarovision 10x42 has snet it back 2 times in one year now. The second time the service was worse.

In short: put these bins on your shortlist and don't buy anything as long as you haven't experienced them yourself
Recommended
Yes
Price
0$
Pros
  • sharpness, brighness, price (compared to Leica APO 82 and Swarovski ATM 80 HD), double focusknob, bajonetfitting, 30x wide, stay on case
Cons
  • FOV 20-60x zoom compared to new Leica and Swaro 25-50x zoom
see above
One member found this helpful.
  • Like
Reactions: Gdfenwick
Recommended
Yes
Price
1700$
Pros
  • sharpness, brightness, look and feel
Cons
  • focus knob less smooth
Recently I traded my Nikon HG L 10x2 for this Zeiss Victory FL 10x 2 (LoTutec): it's just a tad sharper, especially further away, brighter and clearer. The Nikon was very good but now I wanted the best: all colour shades are very clear. uptill now I believe this is the best you can get for a "reasonable" price, at least much cheaper than Leica or Swaorvski. The new Nikon EDG is not yet available in Europe. The objective lens covers are nice to use and the Lotutec serves very very well. But: the viewing is what this is all about. One recognizes the "zeiss image" immediatley: razorsharp and very bright, no flare or chr. aberration. The only minors are the focus knob: I wish it was as perfectley smooth as my late Nikon (but perhaps the knob has to be used a lot to let it work better). My second minor is: the neckstrap feels very nice but the cords are way to long! For the rest: this is my binocular for the next 10 years at least!! You really have to try them if you are in for a high end bino!:t:
Recommended
Yes
Price
0$
Pros
  • excellent optics, brightness, ultra sharp, price, focus knob
Cons
  • no carrying case
After viewing through Swarovski, Leica and Zeiss I knew my next binoculars had to be topclass: it was such an great feeling to watch through such excellent optics! After searching the internet this Nikon came out as at least equal or a little better than Swarovski SLC/EL, Zeiss and Leica. Not very strange in view of my happiness with my Nikon Fieldscope ED 82 A (see my review there). So, without looking through it (they are not common in The Netherlands) I ordered one ..... and I was stunned with the picture!!! Excellent optics and sharp untill the edges, absurdly bright and so sharp. Everytime I look through them a huge :king: appears on my face. And it's much cheaper than it's European competitors. Although it's not a lightweigt it's very easy to handle and the focus know is very smooth, just as in one of the official reviews: "the picture snaps into sharpness". Although it claims to be waterproof, I do miss a carrying case with a carrying strap etc: I want to protect my optics when I am in rain or snow or whatsoever. All in all: a premium binocular, possibly only beaten slightly by the ED-version in rare light conditions, but twice as cheap. I will be very happy for many, many years. This Nikon is the omproved version of the Venturer LX or HG DCF. The L stands for "Light", it has lost a few ounces in weight.
Recommended
Yes
Price
1700$
Pros
  • optics quality, price, brightness, sharpness
Cons
  • FOV zoom eyepiece, weatherprotection case too tight
After I started with a cheaper model I switched to a 5 year old secondhand Swaro ATS 65. But in dull weather (and in The NEtherlands it's more often dull than not) looking through an APO, HD, etc -scope, gave such fine extra''s I started looking for one myself. After looking through many scopes and reading many articles I opted for either the Kowa TSN 883 or the Nikon 82 ED A. There was no difference between them, only when I looked against the sun, then the Nikon had no yellow glare and the Kowa just a little. As the Nikon is much cheaper and I like the helical focus ring, the choice was easy. I bought mine with 30x DS wide angle and it's a very nice combination! A con is the very tight look through case. Another point for improvement: the protection caps fit a little loose (why not tether them?). In the Netherlands this Nikon is hard to get and Nikon does not cooperate to provide testing scopes, not even normal binoculars (which also seem to be very good). Apparently other countries are more important to market (UK, USA). Although not heavier than a Leica Televid, a Swarovski weighs less. In the field I love the brightness en it's very sharp view, quick focusing and lovely eyepiece which is very easy to look through. I prefer angled versions. Comparing one on one with the Leica Apo Televid 77, my Nikon was a litthe brighter and I saw no difference with a Swaro ATS 80 HD. In Holland the Swaro is almost twice as expensive as the Nikon and the rest at least 450.
Top