• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

EF 70-200 f4 L

Canon 70-200
Manufacturer
Canon

Item details

EF mount
Ultra-low Dispersion glass with Fluorite elements; inner focusing ring;
full-time manual focus
70-200mm focal length
f/4 constant maximum aperture
Ring-type UltraSonic Motor (USM)

Latest reviews

Recommended
Yes
Price
0$
Pros
  • fast focus, size, weight, price, sharp.
Cons
  • nil.
It's half the weight of the f2.8, and half the cost too. I bought it just under two years ago now and have never had a problem. The lens hood seems okay to me - did they upgrade it?

I think mine is a later version to those above and has better weather sealing.

There is no box to enter the price paid, but it was just under 500.


Now I have pressed the EDIT button and gone back to the page the price paid box has come up. (What is about this site that everything seems to be made difficult to use?)
Recommended
Yes
Price
539$
Pros
  • sharp, no CA, fast focus, size, weight, PRICE
Cons
  • none
Based on almost no existing poor reviews about the net, I ordered this lens to fill my need for something past 70mm in my kit. This baby "L" tele is extraordinary. The color saturation and contrast are beautiful, without much need (ever) for post processing in these regards. Sharpness is fantastic across all corners of the field, and that's wide open at 200mm (which is where it spends 80% of it's time). I see zero CA in this lens.

Mechanically the lens is solid and tight, while having very smooth ring action for both the focus and zoom. Auto focusing is very quick, and amazingly quiet.

I marked "none" for negative aspects of this lens. Although it does have the following short comings: it's not 2.8, it's not waterproof, and it doesn't have IS, for the current price (less than $600 USD) how can you complain.

It's my current favorite lens. The image quality is so good that I'll even use it in tight situations where a shorter FL lens might be more appropriate, instead using my feet to frame.

As a birding lens? Well, it's 200mm (320mm with an APSC). Not exactly what you call long. Still, if you can get close, you can do very well. Even cropping down retains some excellent detail.

If you are shopping in this FL, and have a moderate budget, buy this lens with zero concern.


Samples:

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2413/2398886752_1d754bbc5e_o.jpg
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3225/2403512977_5a8d813e6f_o.jpg
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2246/2512376822_22882cc146_b.jpg
Recommended
Yes
Price
0$
Pros
  • fast AF, easy to handhold, very sharp
Cons
  • cheap hood
I was surprised to read the previous reviews as I know a number of people who use this lens and have not heard of any other problems.

I was using the Sigma 70-200 f2.8 but wanted a lighter option so switched to the Canon f4 non-IS version about six months ago. I'm extremely impressed with it, the AF is nice and fast and the images are bang on (much sharper than the Sigma). The lens is about half the weight of the Sigma and is much nicer to handhold for long periods of time. It's the perfect lens for candid portraits and action shots of the kids, though I've not shot a single bird or animal with it yet! If you want a general purpose zoom then this is an excellent choice, if you want a birding lens then look for something longer.

Item information

Category
SLR & MFT (micro four thirds) Lenses
Added by
Tobias.N
Views
24,056
Reviews
4
Last update
Rating
4.25 star(s) 4 ratings

More in SLR & MFT (micro four thirds) Lenses

Share this item

Back
Top