• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

120-400mm F4.5-5.6 APO DG OS

Sigma / Nikon / 120-400mm OS / F4.5-5.6
Manufacturer
SIGMA

Item details

Latest reviews

Recommended
Yes
Price
1500$
Pros
  • -
Cons
  • -
I am actually half decided to recommend or not recommend this product. Most people say this is cheap but I'd say this is priced not affordable(Since I am a student and don't really have income-imagine how hard I saved for this bloody lens)...

The quality of the glass against CA is good; lens hood to prevent lens flare reasonably; AF speed is not superbly fast but neither is it exceedingly slow; lens build is solid-Sigma's famous matte black finish; mass of lens although heavy but still acceptable; the OS is reasonable well to say it at least it beats the "SteadyShot Inside" of my Sony a55v body...

The deciding factor is most probably the IQ(Sharpness).... I'd like to say at 120-200mm the lens is pretty sharp wide open(who the heck uses this to shoot birds far away?) but anything beyond that prepare to stop down... sharpness is still acceptable at 300mm wide open(note that its already f5.6)

I have seen tons of reviews saying sharpness wide open at 400mm is acceptable but I beg to differ... Its worse than my (Tamron DI 70-300 f4-5.6 macro) at 300mm wide open. Please mind the price difference. The Tamron although older, is 5times cheaper than the Sigma(Although it lacks the 400mm range and has noisy AF). The sharpness of the Sigma can't even be recovered even using lightroom 4(You just create ultra pixelated pictures) so if you are looking for good IQ you have to stop down but I don't like the idea of stopping down. Who in the right mind buys a lens already at f5.6(very slow) wants to stop down more(f8)? Moreover if you are going to shoot at forested area(like me) I don't think this is going to work out.

Yes... yes... most of you would tell me to use a tripod but I don't want to lose mobility for stability...Moreover the tripod only steadies the camera and lens but not the subject so.... shooting at 1/50 isn't a very good idea is it?

As you all are already told, I use Sony (a55v) and that means my High ISO capability isn't good so basically my ISO threshold is ISO1600-3200.

In conclusion, I must say this lens will work better for High ISO performer cameras like those that can perform at above ISO3200 but not for mid-range or entry-level cameras. If you are starting Bird Photography go get the kit lens... It is more than sufficient for your birding needs till you mature into a full fledged hobbyist bird photographer where you should most likely get manufacturer's own lens in my case the Sony 70-400; Canon users, Canon's very own 100-400 push-pull and for Nikon users, 200-400... Thats why I am half-decided on whether to recommend or not to recommend since I don't really want to make people think to highly of this lens and in the end be disappointed that it does not perform up to their standard...

$1500 is a great deal of money even to those with middle income...
So do consider and weigh your options...

To save more or to buy cheap equipment? Thats your choice....
Do visit my profile on facebook and comment on my photos..

Sincerely,
Darren(facebook name: Dlkillwaterbear)
A hobbyist Bird photographer stuck in Singapore.
Recommended
Yes
Price
0$
Pros
  • Solid construction, smooth focus ring, works well on a monopod
Cons
  • Heavy
Bought this a year ago when I went to get the Sigma 50-500, which was out of stock for Sony mount, so I bought this as it also got good comments in dpreview.com.

Using both Sony A100 and SLT A55V with this lens, brings great shots hand-held for medium range. Continuous focus of the A55 tracks an quickly maintains focus on flying birds.

I have also used the 2x teleconverter with tripod for some quite good results (especially one of the moon iso100/f11/ S1/100). Manual only focusing, but the smooth focus ring action when using the Alpha55 x7 and x14 focus zoom feature, means a crisp focus is achievable.

Medium distance telemacro effect using extension tubes with this lens in good light has also delivered good shots of Butterflies, wasps etc..
Recommended
Yes
Price
0$
Pros
  • solid construction..sharp photos at wide angle
Cons
  • poor quality at 400mm
I bought this lens after going to my local camera story to but the canon 100-400. I liked the construction, much lower price and after trying both on my cameras there didnt seem to be much difference in pic quality. When the sigma focuses I can get sharp images for my purposes. I've also messed up quite a few shots at long focal lengths, which is why I bought the lens. I almost went back to but a used Canon 100-400 but still didnt like the push pull design. Sigma just came out with a new 50-500 with os that is getting great reviews for the price of the canon.. might consider that. For now I shoot the sigma on a tripod, f8 to f11 low iso and no filter... pics have been ok in this regard.

Item information

Category
SLR & MFT (micro four thirds) Lenses
Added by
lozninja
Views
53,540
Reviews
9
Last update
Rating
3.22 star(s) 9 ratings

More in SLR & MFT (micro four thirds) Lenses

Share this item

Back
Top