Join for FREE
It only takes a minute!
Zeiss - Always on the lookout for something special – Shop now

Welcome to BirdForum.
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community, dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is absolutely FREE! You are most welcome to register for an account, which allows you to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.

  Home · Search · Member List · Register  
Home » Cameras, DSLR & MFT (micro four thirds) » SLR & MFT (micro four thirds) Lenses  

Nikon AF-S 80-400/4.5-5.6 G ED VR II N
Reviews Views Date of last review
1 28596 Mon January 13, 2014
Recommended By Average Price Average Rating
100% of reviewers None indicated 8.0




Description: The best review I've read, of the new 80-400, is the one written by Ming Thein. Here is a pertinent paragraph:

"In my mind, the 80-400 has several alternatives in roughly the same range: the 70-200/2.8 II with 2x teleconverter; the 70-300/4.5-5.6 VR G; and finally, the 200-400/4. The first option is about the same size and weight (including the converter, smaller without) and gives you another two stops if you don’t need the reach; however, the optics are nowhere near as good as the 80-400. The second option is the lightest and cheapest of the lot, but it has a significantly slower T stop and experiences a noticeable drop in resolving power above 200mm. The final lens is even larger, heavier and more expensive; it’s a ‘proper’ supertele in the same all-magnesium, super-high end build and fast AF mould as the rest of the fast exotics (the 80-400 has a lot of plastics in its external components, presumably to keep weight and cost down); you gain a stop, but boy, does your back pay for it."

He also compares it with Nikon's 400, and found very little difference in sharpness, slightly softer, maybe.

My own experience isn't vast, but I've owned a lot of 400s, and similar lenses (including Sigma 120-400 & Sigma 150-500) through the years, and I own the AF-S 70-300 VR, mentioned by Ming, plus Tamron's excellent 70-200/2.8.

To me, the 80-400 balances better than any of these. It focuses fast on both my V1 and my D600, and it is the sharpest long lens I've come across, especially if one weighs in sharpness from edge to edge, and sharpness in the long end. Nothing else I could ever afford comes close!

The complete Ming review can be found here:
Keywords: superb affordable telezoom 80-400

Post A Reply 
Mark K

Registered User

Registered: June 2006
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 27
Review Date: Mon January 13, 2014 Would you recommend the product? Yes | Price you paid?: None indicated | Rating: 8 

Pros: Fast focusing, improved image quality
Cons: Focal length breathing, price

I had the version I and later also have Canon 100-400, Sony 70-400G. The version I was the least satisfied one....and this one showed huge improvement in handling thanks to AFS, sharpness.
It was very difficult to accept the product initially because of increase in price to 2.5 times of older version, and also being more expensive than sharper competitors Sony 70-400G and Canon 100-400L. However, as a stand alone product, the convenience and image quality remained unchallenged. For starter wildlife shooter, this is a highly recommended one except if you take prime telephoto lenses into account.

Mark K
This user is offline
Click here to see this users profile Click here to Send this user a Private Message Find more posts by this user  

Powered by: ReviewPost PHP vB3 Enhanced
Copyright 2006 All Enthusiast, Inc.

Fatbirder's Top 1000 Birding Websites

Help support BirdForum

All times are GMT. The time now is 21:48.