Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.
Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Personally as a UK shooter I'm little disappointed with this lens even more so with Canon generally, I didn't particularly rate the extending 100-400 taking a long time to get used to the 100-500. Whilst Nikon and Sony are churning out some interesting lens at lower price points we get this...
Purchase a 5D4 from Panamoz, sold it 2 years later to MBP for £350 less than what I paid for it, no issues selling apart a £30 drop in the valuation due to a higher shutter count.
Personally I think the R3 has merits for bird photograph, I know there's a few on this forum that have used the 1DX2 so the natural progression. R3 has better AF over the R5, better buffer as you would expect, cost wise you can pick one up from Panomoz for around £4900 and thats where I'll be...
Facebook !....not really. He's an established reviewer like him or not, gives his opinion based on what ever testing he dose, ultimately as you say it's a choice to be made.
Can't agree that EF lens work better on a RF body, yes my remaining EF 500mm 2 lens works just fine on the RF body but is that better than a RF version ? I don't know I haven't tried and I'm unlikely to find out at £13k. My 100-400 was changed to the 100-500, (I wouldn't do it now, as since Feb...
Even more news DSLR's are dead with values heading south as the reports now are EF lens are also now being discontinued heading the same way. Apart from one remaining "big white" the rest of my EF system has gone !
Are you really considering upgrading to a camera to one over 7 years old ?....I have a 7D2 which I haven't used for a very long time as I use mirrorless, the only reason I still have it is it's probably only worth about £200. Recently I was photographing a Red Throated Diver as it was at some...
Sorry I don't agree with that statement having tried it....have you ?
All my lens have replacement feet mainly to eliminate the arca-swiss plate becoming loose, but most or all replacement feet that I know won't work with the likes of Flexshooter as the balance point is so finite hence you need...
Bid late....I would have thought there would be more millage in changing the tripod to a lighter version, personally I find Gitzo's tripods heavy, quality yes but way to heavy for me. I've been using Feisol for the last six years which feels like half the weight of the gitzo equivalent. The...
I shoot entirely in manual tweaking when needed viewing the histogram, other than that when out I don't mess around changing the camera settings preferring to use a custom setting assigned to the MFn button, one press and boom...the ISO/shutter/f-stop are all changed, instantly including to the...
Some interesting techniques, personally I never turn the lens IS off as above 700mm FL I prefer stability in the camera viewer which also seems to me aid AF, the 1.4 ext seems to live on the big lens when reach is an issue but not so on the 70-200 or the 100-400
Here's an image of a Slav Grebe...
Canon have done right keeping existing users onside providing a EF/RF adaptor so there's no need for a complete clear out, the new RF "big whites" are existing "built in adapted" EF lens so nothings really changed on that front so why would you change a Canon 600mm f4 for a Sony F4 of similar...
Are DSLR cameras dead, or soon to be obsolete ?…it certainly looks it to me
Most, if not all manufacturers bringing new cameras to market are all now mirrorless, they are smaller, lighter, faster, better AF systems, more durable, and with Canon announcing the R3 another mirrorless camera at the...