• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

Search results

thxpress_search_the_forum Search Opus
  1. Björn Bergenholtz

    Calandrella

    Thanks guys, for all your help sorting out this query! Well, I´m content: Thereby that certain "T. ruficeps", mentioned by Shelley in 1902, was/is the equal of today's erlangeri NEUMANN 1906. Dr. Blanford sure must have been quite a sharp-eyed birder in those days. ;) "T. ruficeps" ... over...
  2. Björn Bergenholtz

    Calandrella

    Thanks, Laurent! You answer and reply even quicker than I can write! ;)
  3. Björn Bergenholtz

    Calandrella

    The main issue (at least for me) is to understand which one of today's taxon Dr. Blanford regarded as different from the Lark that since 1902 have his name. Was I thereby correct in assuming that he regarded it as distinct from today's Erlanger's Lark ... ? The taxonomy of those smaller Larks...
  4. Björn Bergenholtz

    Calandrella

    IOC (7.01): If so; why isn´t Rüppel's name (of 1835) valid? ---
  5. Björn Bergenholtz

    Calandrella

    "Tephrocorys ruficeps" in Shelly 1902 ... ? Anyone know which of today's taxon is equal of the "T. ruficeps" [Tephrocorys ruficeps], mentioned in the OD of Calandrella blanfordi SHELLEY 1902 (here, & plate, here, fig.2) as "Tephrocorys blanfordi" (where Dr. Blanford was the first to regard the...
Back
Top