• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

Feather ID help please! (1 Viewer)

Hi everyone,

I found this feather in a field in Malmo, Sweden a few days ago. The only birds of prey I've personally seen around here are kestrels, but I'm definitely sure there could be more. I'm desperate to know what bird this came from as I can't seem to identify it myself with other images!

It's about 14.5cm long.

Any help at all would be fantastic!

https://i.imgur.com/e0E1rY9.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/0sTBPnc.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/IWcm6PQ.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/F1i9ii3.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/jYDThPJ.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/0zrLgVn.mp4

(Please forgive the little hairs around the place, I have a malamute and she's shedding!)
 
It's an owl - note the 'fluffy' surface of the webs. Probably either Long-eared or Short-eared, but wouldn't like to say which.


PS Welcome to Birdforum!
 
Hi! Do you really think it's an owl feather? That would be amazing!

I'm so sorry, I'm new to feather identification, so can I ask what you mean by "webs"? Now that I look at it though, it is quite soft and fluffy in places, I hadn't noticed that before!

And thank you :D
 
Yes, definitely an owl! No other birds have such soft feathers - it means they can fly silently and hear perfectly to catch their prey by complete surprise in the dark :t:


The webs are the parts on either side of the main shaft down the middle.
 
Oohhh, wow, that's so cool! Thank you so much for helping me with this! I can't believe I found an owl feather :D I looked up long-eared and short-eared owl feathers and I think it might be the former :) (I'm hesitant to say as I'm so new to this!)
 
Warning! This thread is more than 4 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top