• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

The Eponym Dictionary of Birds (1 Viewer)

The Beavan brothers. Having revisited the name beavani and read the original descriptions I have reached the conclusion that Alcedo, Dicrurus and Prinia were named after Capt. Robert Beavan, and that Periparus was named after Lt. Reginald Beavan. I shall re-edit the Key accordingly.

I am just curious how you came to this conclusion? I personally think Reginald has no middle name with C. So every time a R. C. Beavan is mentioned it seems to me Robert Cecil Beavan. Here with fish we clearly have Reginald in the boat. I see him only as ichthyologist therefore I would attribute a fish to him here as I assume Günther was confused about the brothers as well.
 
Agreed, all named after Robert - I was confused by Blyth. Reginald appears to have spent a lot of his time on the North West Frontier fighting troublesome tribesmen.
 
Today's updated HBW Alive Key:
beavani
Capt. Robert Cecil Beavan (1841-1870) British Army in India, ornithologist (syn. Alcedo meninting rufigastra, syn. Dicrurus leucophaeus longicaudatus, subsp. Periparus rubidiventris, subsp. Prinia rufescens).
Reginald has gone fishing. Peace and serenity. Unity rules.
 
For sure incorrect as well here:


'Adolpho Lessiano' not making it clear whether this referred to his brother Pierre Adolphe or his father Adolph(e).


The fathers name was René Clément Lesson (1760–1844). See here. It's hard for me to interpret any Adolph(e) into his name.

But leads me as well to a question. According to the key:

adolphei
Prof. Pierre-Adolphe Lesson (1805-1888) French surgeon-explorer, botanist (syn. Phaethornis ruber nigricinctus).

So why has Trochilus Adolphei Lesson, 1843 no priority over Phaethornis ruber nigricinctus Lawrence, 1858 here OD?

And was he really a Prof.?
 
Last edited:
One more error in The Eponym Dictionary of Birds. About Theodore Sherman Palmer they wrote here and next here.

Two replites and a mammal are named after him.

Of couse no issue with Oreortyx picta palmeri.

But from the reptiles of The Eponym Dictionary of Reptiles I can't accept Uta palmeri OD here as the honor goes to Dr. Edward Palmer (1831–1911).

Anyway they claimed in thei several Eponym books T. S. Palmer (apart from The Eponym Dictionary of Birds) continously as botanist. I do not agree on this as well.

Small comment on the key as of today:

● Dr Theodore Sherman Palmer (1868-1955) US zoologist at Department of Agriculture 1889-1933, nomenclatorist, philologist (subsp. Oreortyx picta).

I think it is not treated as a subsp. but as synonym to nominated form.

Take it for what's worth.
 
"Beavan's Bullfinch" (again)

As "Beavan's Bullfinch" (earlier dealt with in posts #50-64) once again resurfaced (this time in the Bird Taxonomy and Nomenclature forum, thread; Latest IOC diary updates, post/s #110-114, by Andy and "Nutty"), I once again got curious (and felt somewhat obligated to reply ;), see #115, here), regarding the true identity of the dedicatee commemorated in this common/vernacular name ...

Does anyone know where the Type of Pyrrhula erythaca itself ended up? If it's still around, of course (it's not in the BNHM Type collection database), but maybe there's a label somewhere, that could tell us ... anything?

/B
 
I would say Reginald Beavan was more in Punjab region and not in Darjeling where the specimen was collected. Bengal area was more Robert Cecil Beavans collection territory. As welll R.C. Beavan was in Bengal Native Infantry; Reginald in Punjab Native Infantry. Would count for R. C. Beavan.
 
Last edited:
By his own word [here], the collector was the same "Capt. R. C. Beavan" of the Bengal Staff Corps, who published Notes on various Indian birds in Ibis in 1865-68 (and who indeed seems to have been Robert Cecil -- if not, then we are in trouble ;)).
 
Last edited:
By his own word [here], the collector was the same "Capt. R. C. Beavan" of the Bengal Staff Corps, who published Notes on various Indian birds in Ibis in 1865-68 (and who indeed seems to have been Robert Cecil -- if not, then we are in trouble ;)).
Re. his rank, in this Death Notice (from 1870) he's: "Mr ROBERT CECIL BEAVAN, Lieutenant ..." (here, bottom of page) ... ?

The plot thickens!
 
The German Wikipedia articles appear to say it all.

So there are two brothers and both have have taxa named after them. I would have inferred the best way to distinguish them, if only first initial given, would be from the rank give in the ODs. Robert Cecil never rose above the rank of Lieutenant. It is surpising if Robert was authoring papers in Ibis stating his rank was Captain perhaps this was the editors error?

Robert Cecil Beavan
1841–1870
BIRTH 14 AUG 1841 Mainpuri, Uttar Pradesh, India
DEATH 03 FEB 1870 At Sea

Reginald Beavan
1843–1927
BIRTH 20 SEP 1843 • Landour, Bengal, India
DEATH 12 MAY 1927 • Radnorshire, Wales

I can find no evidence of a middle name for Reginald.

In the case of the English moniker "Beavans Bullfinch" it is unequivical that this was named after Ltn Robert Cecil Beavan of the 63rd.

Careful examination of other OD's for the Beavans will be required to establish for whom the taxon is named and for some it maybe impossible as it is clear that some in England didn't realise there were 2 brothers and may have inadvertantly confused some of Reginald's finds - this applies also in icthyology as several taxa were named in honour of Reginald.
 

Attachments

  • Beaven.JPG
    Beaven.JPG
    22 KB · Views: 6
Last edited:
It is surpising if Robert was authoring papers in Ibis stating his rank was Captain perhaps this was the editors error?
The error of quite a few editors, then.
J. Asiat. Soc. Bengal, 1867: https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/37181007
The Intellectual Observer, 1867: https://books.google.be/books?id=gkk4AAAAIAAJ&pg=PA170
PZS, 1867: https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/28504076
...

Incidentally, Reginald did not rise above the rank of Lieutenant during his brother's lifetime either. So this can't be explained by confusion between the two brothers.
 
Last edited:
In the US, British, and (presumably) British Indian Army a retiree who previously held a higher rank can apply for advancement to that higher rank on the retired list. One possibility is that Robert Cecil received a field promotion that was reversed - a close search of the Annual Army lists would allow this possibility to be eliminated.

What I do find unlikely is that Beavan was deliberately impersonating a Captain. The "Ripping Yarns" skit about the code of honour in the British Indian Army comes to mind here.

The timing of Beavans enlistment is curious and some of the facts are off...

The army list indicates that he enlisted in the 62nd BNI - this is interesting as this regiment rebelled in the Indian Mutany at Multan and was disbanded in the early 1860s.

What I find odd is that here he is stated as being in the 63rd regiment which did not rebel and, in the ensuing disbandment of Bengal Army regiments, the 63rd became what eventually is still called the 9th Gorkha Rifles.

P
 
Last edited:
1864, Oct, Intell. Obs. https://books.google.be/books?id=Kos7AQAAMAAJ&pg=PA170: "R. C. Beavan, Lieut. Bengal Survey"

1865/66, PZS (meeting of 28 Nov 1865, published Apr 1866) https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/28497685: "Capt. R. C. Beavan, Lieut. Bengal Survey"

1865, Oct, Ibis https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/31142989: "R. C. Beavan, Capt. Bengal Survey"
1866, Oct, Intell. Obs. https://books.google.be/books?id=gkk4AAAAIAAJ&pg=PA170: "Captain R. C. Beavan"

1867, Jan, Ibis https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/8455416, https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/8455416, https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/8455421: "R. C. Beavan" without a rank

1867, 18 Jun https://books.google.be/books?id=oIsPAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA639, his admission to the Bengal Staff Corps https://books.google.be/books?id=oIsPAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA648 ("dated 1st March 1859"[!]) as a Lieutenant was approved by the Queen.

1867, Jul, Ibis https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/8455598: "R. C. Beavan, Capt. Bengal Staff Corps"
1867, Oct, Ibis https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/8455722: "R. C. Beavan, Capt. Bengal Staff Corps"
1868, Jan, Ibis https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/16341684: "R. C. Beavan, Capt. Bengal Staff Corps"
1868, Jan, Ibis https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/16341745: "Captain Beavan"
1868, Feb, J. Asiat. Soc. Bengal https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/37180826, https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/37181007: "Captain R. C. Beavan"
1868, Apr, Ibis https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/16341778: "R. C. Beavan, Capt. Bengal Staff Corps"

1868, PZS (meeting of 11 Jun, published Oct) https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/28664937: "R. C. Beavan, Bengal Staff Corps" without a rank
1868, Oct, Ibis https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/16342112: "R. C. Beavan" without a rank
1869, Oct, Ibis https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/8619433: "R. C. Beavan, Bengal Staff Corps" without a rank (but he is "Capt. Beavan" in the headers of the paper's pages)

1870, Apr, obituary in Ibis https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/16187240: "Mr. Robert Cecil Beavan, Lieutenant in the Bengal Staff Corps"

1870, Jul, Ibis https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/16187249: "R. C. Beavan, Bengal Staff Corps" without a rank (but he is "Capt. Beavan" in the headers of the paper's pages)

1874, Jun, AO Hume in Stray Feathers https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/29846836: "Captain Beavan"

I guess this might potentially be consistent with a promotion to the rank of Captain (in late 1865 ?) while in the Bengal Survey (I'm not fully clear what the Bengal Survey was, though), which was reversed/not recognised when he was confirmed in the Staff Corps in June 1867 ? Meanwhile, Ibis, as well as some authors who had known him when he was in the Survey (e.g. Hume), and possibly subsequent authors referring to specimens he had collected while in the Survey (if his rank of the time was recorded in the info associated to the specimens), might have continued to present him as a Captain...?
In his letters published in Ibis, he did not state his rank in his signature: it seems conceivable that his rank was added by an editor in at least some of his papers (and thus out of his control).
 
Last edited:
(Robert Cecil) Beavan's Bullfinch

Well, ... I´m still a bit stuck (and somewhat bewildered) by R. C. Beavan, though not about the identity of dedicatee himself (I'm pretty sure we've got the proper guy!), but I'm still confused about his alleged rank/s ...

This Robert Cecil Beavan seems to have enlisted in 1858 (4 November), as either one of those "Cornets and ensigns", here (the lowest of ranks among Officers). But wouldn't that be young for a guy born in 1841 (14 August) ...only 17 years old? Or is this a reasonable start of a Military career?

Either way, and with the risk of being tedious (as Laurent apparently had the similar idea last Tuesday), and I thought of deleting my scribblings ... but what-the-heck, I will post them anyway, simply as I compiled it all (i.e. this post, and the subsequent/forthcoming ones). I don't want to feel that I've wasted my time completely! ;) No-one likes too many hours of work done "in vain" ...

Ok, here we go (again); if we follow the track record of "our guy", in The Ibis (alone), we find the following:

1859–1861 (i.e. the very first editions, vol. I–III, of The Ibis) — No Beavan (what-so-ever).


1862 — Blyth (i.e. the OD of 'Beavan's Bullfinch'): "Lieut. Beavan (of the late 63rd B.N.I.) has just returned here [to Calcutta, I assume, where Blyth worked] from Darjeeling, where (though chiefly on Tonglo Mountain) ... he has collected many good things in a very short time. Of novelties, a fine new true Bullfinch (Pyrrhula erythaca, nobis), ..."


1863 — Blyth (here, and Plate here; as "Pyrrhula eruthacus" [sic]): "This bird was shot by my friend Lieut. Beavan, of the late 63rd B. N. I, ..."


1864 — No Beavan.


1865Notes on various Indian Birds (here, pp.400–423), by "R. C. Beavan, Capt. Bengal Survey, M.A.S., C.M.Z.S., &c."


1866 — Jerdon; (here) "Capt, Beavan informs me ...", (here) "Captain Beavan writes to me ...", (and here) "Capt. Beavan has lately ..."

In the List of content (here) he's: "Capt. Beavan*" ["* By mistake printed Capt. Blair at p. 220." (i.e. here and here)]

There's also a letter from "R. C. Beavan" (no title/rank) himself, on pp.419-420.


1867The Avifauna of the Andaman Islands, by "R. C. Beavan, Capt. Bengal Staff Corps. C.M.Z.S." (pp. 314-334, here)
Notes on various Indian Birds (here, pp.430-455, "continued from ... 1865, p.423"), by "R. C. Beavan, Capt. Bengal Staff Corps. C.M.Z.S."

There's also a letter, dated "Simla, June 22nd, 1866", on pp. 136-138, from/signed "R. C. Beavan (no title or rank, though in the List of content, it's apparently from the same; "Capt. Beavan").

Also note that he, poor guy (again!), ended up in the; Errata et corrigenda (on p.XII): Page 12, line 3 "of note, for that gentleman read Captain Beavan." (the error itself; here) ... which is a reference back to The Proceedings of the Asiatic Society of Calcutta, here (from May 1865), where Beavan (on preceding page) is mentioned as "Lieutenant R. C. Beavan".

In the List of Members for Asiatic Society (Feb. 1865, here) he's also listed as: "Lieut. R. C. Beavan", as well as ditto on pp. 5, 66, 129, 190, 204 (all until Dec.1865) ... !?!


1868 — Beavan himself; "Capt." (in the header/top of pages), (here); Additional notes on various Indian Birds: "I came across a flock of this new species on my way up Mount Tongloo in April 1862. ... Mr. Blyth, who described it in ‘The Ibis’ for 1862 (pp.389, 390), and in the following year furnished its portrait (Ibis, 1863, pl. x)."

Also noteworthy is the words by "Capt." Beavan on p.387: "I lately received a fine pair of this large Bustard from my Brother, Lieut. Reginald Beavan [*], of the 22nd Punjab Native Infantry, who ...", indicating that any Naturalists back in Europe couldn't have been all unaware of the fact that there was (at least two) officers by the name Beavan, roaming the field in far-way India (that is, if they had read that certain piece, of course).

In the List of content for the same Ibis 1868, he's repeatedly listed as: "R. C. Beavan, Bengal Staff Corps, C.M.Z.S." (on pp. ix, x, xiii), and in a letter to the Editor the same "R. C. Beavan" (no title/rank) also propose the name "Buchanga waldeni, sp. nov." (on p.497).


1869 — "Capt." Beavan himself (here); yet another piece by the title; Additional notes on various Indian Birds, by "R. C. Beavan, Bengal Staff Corps, C.M.Z.S." (pp.403-426)


1870 — Editorial (here), probably written by Alfred Newton (the Editor himself), on pp.301-302: "It is with very great regret that we have to announce to our readers the death of a frequent and valuable contributor to our pages, Mr ROBERT CECIL BEAVAN, Lieutenant in the Bengal Staff Corps. ..."

Only a few pages later (pp.310-327), the promised, last (posthumous) Additional notes on various Indian Birds, by "R. C. Beavan, Bengal Bengal Staff Corps., C.M.Z.S."


1871 — Jerdon (here): "Mr. Beavan states ...", also mentioned as simply "Beavan" (on p. 346). No titles in Heaven, I guess. ;)


1872 — Jerdon (here): "... obtained by Mr. Beavan", and (here): "... the late Mr. Beavan ... ", alt. simply just "Beavan", in various references to earlier texts (as of above).


1873— only as "Beavan" with various references to earlier texts (in the same Ibis, as of above).


1874— once as "Captain Beavan" (here), elsewhere repeatedly, as above, only as "Beavan" in various references ...


1875 — Once mentioned (here): "Since Captain Beavan first obtained ... "


1876 — ... and similar, onwards (R.I.P.)


Björn

To be continued ...​

_____________________________________________________________________________
*Note that this is the only place, in all those issues of The Ibis, where his Brother "Reginald" is mentioned by his given name.
At least so, by using the "Search Inside this book" function (I haven't read every single words in all those journals.
 
Beavan addendum

And, by the way: Did R. C. Beavan ever visited the Andamans? As claimed in his German Wikipedia entry (written by Martin?), and by Bikram Grewal, see the first quote in post #59.

Note that R. C. Beavan's paper The Avifauna of the Andaman Islands (in The Ibis 1867, here, pp.314-334), was based mainly on R. C. Tytler's collections. If R. C. Beavan himself ever visited the Andamans is unknown to me. Maybe that's simply a mix-up between "R.C.T." vs "R.C.B" ... ?!?

Compare this entry for "Eulabes andamanensis" BEAVAN 1867 (today's Hill Myna ssp. Gracula religiosa andamanensis), clearly claiming Beavan as its collector, versus the OD itself (on p.331, here) ... ?

If anyone know of any other article (or document), clearly showing us that Beavan did visit the Andamans (in person), please let me know.

I sure wouldn't mind adding the Andaman Islands to his "CV", of collecting localities (in my notes/for my MS). ;)

/B
--
 
Last edited:
And, by the way: Did R. C. Beavan ever visited the Andamans? As claimed in his German Wikipedia entry (written by Martin?), and by Bikram Grewal, see the first quote in post #59.

Note that R. C. Beavan's paper The Avifauna of the Andaman Islands (in The Ibis 1867, here, pp.314-334), was based mainly on R. C. Tytler's collections. If R. C. Beavan himself ever visited the Andamans is unknown to me. Maybe that's simply a mix-up between "R.C.T." vs "R.C.B" ... ?!?

I think you are right. Even in the potential new birds we can read Tytler. So Robert Chistopher Tytler was the man in charge.

But note here where Beavan wrote:

I did not observe either species during my visit in 1865.
 
Last edited:
...
Cut note here where Beavan wrote:
I did not observe either species during my visit in 1865.
You're right, Beavan apparently did visit Ross Island (in the Andamans) in 1865 (see here), my error, I simply missed that one while compiling post #77 (also compare with the other links for Ibis 1866, in the same post).

I guess I was a bit to busy looking for his rank ...

Sorry for the fuzz Martin (and Bikram Grewal, of course) ;)

Björn
 
Warning! This thread is more than 2 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top