View Single Post
Old Sunday 10th February 2019, 20:06   #11
Kevin Conville
yardbirder
BF Supporter 2019
 
Kevin Conville's Avatar

 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: State of Chaos
Posts: 2,009
I don't think the article is analogous to binoculars. The article describes the merits of having more pixels and how that "smooths" the image. And while this is accurate, the human/binocular equation is purely analog. No pixels.

I do think that resolution and (perceived) sharpness can be somewhat different things. Higher contrast can often affect how sharp an image will appear and also aid focusing. But the higher contrast optics may not perform better on a resolution chart, carefully viewed with a rest, for example.

I recently encountered this while comparing Nikon 8x30 MHGs to Zeiss 8x25 Victorys.
The Victorys seemed to focus a little faster as the point of sharpness was slightly more apparent. However, when viewing a USAF chart and other texts from a steady rest, the Monarchs ultimately resolved as well as the Victorys.
__________________
my bird pics

Scott's Miracle Grow KILLING Birds, for Years!
read this: http://www.birdforum.net/showthread.php?t=226714

Last edited by Kevin Conville : Sunday 10th February 2019 at 20:18.
Kevin Conville is offline  
Reply With Quote

BF Supporter 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2018 2019 Support BirdForum With A Donation