Originally Posted by Purple Heron
Overall, I got the impression that the author, while he would not consider effects of EMR on wildlife to be proven, would not say that EMR does not affect wildlife. He advocates more and better research
Just about every paper you see now advocates this. All it means is "we have FAILED to prove our point; really that does not mean we are INCOMPETENT; nor that our hypothesis is WRONG; just that we haven't had enough MONEY yet - keep on pouring it in and we will spend it all with no great progress and come back and demand MORE."