Hauksen and Jurek have really provided 'best in class' models for addressing mis-identifications by other birders.
Highlighting the evidence is vastly preferable to 'proof by assertion', at least if one is trying for agreement. That applies even to the BF discussions of bird IDs from photos, an explanation of the reasons for a conclusion is enormously more valuable than the ID itself.
Highlighting the evidence is vastly preferable to 'proof by assertion', at least if one is trying for agreement. That applies even to the BF discussions of bird IDs from photos, an explanation of the reasons for a conclusion is enormously more valuable than the ID itself.