Maybe it is the age of the personnel/observer with the glass that determines the aperture.
Andy W.
I'll say Carol was the youngest and then me then the rest. I'm thinking most just don't realize the optic ability of a nice 32mm.
Maybe it is the age of the personnel/observer with the glass that determines the aperture.
Andy W.
I'll say Carol was the youngest and then me then the rest. I'm thinking most just don't realize the optic ability of a nice 32mm.
I have noticed an increase in the number of Swaro FL 8x32's I have seen over the past 2-3 years. Also the Swaro CL's
I guess you mean Zeiss FL 8x32s??
Lee
No, actually that is a Swaro FL 8x32. It is the result of a Swaro EL 8x32 breeding with a Zeiss FL 8x32. It has the best characteristics of both.I guess you mean Zeiss FL 8x32s??
Lee
No, actually that is a Swaro FL 8x32. It is the result of a Swaro EL 8x32 breeding with a Zeiss FL 8x32. It has the best characteristics of both.
Your right! No RB like the SV, sharper edges than the FL, better CA control than the SV, better glare control than the SV and a smoother focus than either mom(SV 8x32) or dad(FL 8x32).That child was named Nikon EDG 8x32.
I guess he means Swaro EL.
I've had both for years and years. Not much of a contest-- for me anyway.
Hiya Lee!
No, actually that is a Swaro FL 8x32. It is the result of a Swaro EL 8x32 breeding with a Zeiss FL 8x32. It has the best characteristics of both.
Your right! No RB like the SV, sharper edges than the FL, better CA control than the SV, better glare control than the SV and a smoother focus than either mom(SV 8x32) or dad(FL 8x32).
Dennis:
I will agree with you here, Nikon has always done things right, they have
been around for over 100 years.
The premier camera company has high standards, so you see that in all of the offerings.
The binoculars always strive to meet certain things, user friendly, great optics and great fit and finish.
Jerry
Eronald,
It is absolutely scientifically impossible for a binocular to deliver any more light to the retina of your eye than you would see directly. As well as the magnification and field of view influencing our perception, binocular designers play psycological games with the, colour spectrum and contrast so you might think you do, but invariably the total light level will be less than seeing directly.
I bright conditions when the pupil of your eye is just 2mm a 8x16 would deliver the same target luminance as an 8x56 providing other physical parameters like the transmission spectrum were the same.
Hope that's clear.
David
That is not true. I have used 7x50 binoculars out on the ocean at night to find harbor entrances and could see objects with them that were impossible to see without them. Part of it was the 7x magnification but the 50mm objective lenses were also concentrating the light on the exit pupil of 7mm size which is where the "twilight" factor comes into play...
So have the 8X32s replaced the 8X42s? It would be nice to see some actual sales numbers here in the US and in Europe, however if we include more than the famous four brands, that would be a headache.
Andy W.