wolfbirder
Well-known member
I have no issue attaching 5 images per post on Birdforum, so at the end of my report I just add extra posts with the images. I usually only have to add 3 extra as I rarely have more than 15 images.
I have no issue attaching 5 images per post on Birdforum, so at the end of my report I just add extra posts with the images. I usually only have to add 3 extra as I rarely have more than 15 images.
To be honest I find uploading images on here to accompany my trip reports to be rather time consuming compared to other forums I use. That might be putting off people from posting..
Andy,
the only remedy and therapy is to keep writing good reports with all the gen and practical stuff, and spread them on the internet. ;-)
A good report should have the following:
1. A general idea about the aim of travel, the experience of birding in nearby countries / areas previous to the trip, and the cost of the trip.
This is the best way to know what to expect from the report, given the reader's aims / budget / experience.
2. descriptions how to get to the birding sites, indications of travel time, and a travel schedule;
This is especially useful while using public transport. It helps in preparing a realistic schedule.
3. contact info of hotels / lodges / guides / rental companies / drivers / and of course your own email adress
Especially for destinations where some preparation from home could come in useful (e.g. to reserve some Amazonian lodges, birding hotels, guides that are often fully occupied...
4. site descriptions / target birds / missed species / + info on how to find those target birds + GPS
Mention the trails you birded on, what you searched for, what you searched but didn't find, stake-outs / fruiting trees / gullies / etc. And no crap about "woow we saw that bird but I can't tell where because it gives my guide an edge". If so, don't write a report. Just be cautious with endangered birds that are subject to trapping and hunting (e.g. only provide GPS through email).
5. factors influencing the succes/failure of birding (traffic, entrance fees, restrictions, permits, weather)
Some things are awfully expensive, some days traffic is awfully bad, some days are rained out, some places require luck to get there early morning. Mention this.
6. Annotated trip lists, especially some info on good species.
Annotated trip lists are very useful if you had a good trip with keen birders. In this way, you have a better understanding of what birds are really possible to see (or not to see) in a certain area.
e.g. if a die-hard group of 4 experienced birders didn't see a quite common species in a certain area, and you are visiting that area with the assumption that you are going to see that bird... -> chances will be low.
if a single unexperienced traveller didn't see that species in that area, maybe you will succeed.
7. Optional:
daily log, pictures, self-drawn maps
A daily log can be useful, but only if it provides an indication of time schedule during the day. Pictures can be useful (especially from accomodation, landscape, landmarks). Maps are very handy for some trails without any good google maps coverage (less so these days)
last but not least:
The most important thing to keep in mind when writing a report:
write it for the one who reads it (as if you were going there and needed all that info)!
It takes some time and experience to write good reports in this way...
I am still struggling, but I hope I am improving with every report (currently writing one on C-Peru).
each their own I guess.
And if e.g. a good bird finding guide exists, there is maybe less of a need to write site descriptions etc.
In fact, if any of the 7 points I mentioned are covered well, the report has value. If none have been covered, the report is pretty useless... That's how I see it.