temmie
Well-known member
Wow, you guys have un-peeled (pun) a previously un-heralded problem with Swaros.
I (and others) have been saying this for years on this forum. Older Trinovids were the biz, as they had ultra durable armour and it was wrapped around the body in a way that didn't leave too many weak points (where rubber could peel of or tear). Newer Swaro, Zeiss, Leica,... all have specific problems with intensive use. Most on this forum will never use their binoculars intensively. They will recommend certain top alpha binoculars but have very little experience with intensive use and thus cannot say anything relevant about durability.
You have a topic with pictures showing problems with Swaro armour. Are you in a state of denial?I don't think there are any problems with Swaro armour. ...
You want to know a little secret? Free of charge doesn't exist, at least not when a company wants to make some profit. Swaro's service is a good thing but it's paid through the premium price of their products, and at that price, one shouldn't expect free service but rather a non-faulty product.Swarovski deserves praise for replacing the armour at no charge because I don't think many manufacturers would go that extra mile to do that.
When I buy an expensive Mercedes-Benz I won't praise them for treating rust on my 3-year old car for free or including anti-rust products in the sale of the car. It shouldn't rust in the first place!