I`ll certainly be interested to try them when ever that chance comes. The spec is hard to fault, the 8x32SV just about managed to replace a 42mm as my main tool, but, and I know many on here have no issues with the stray light control in the SV, it ruined some great views for me.
If the 32SF matches the SV in every other aspect, adding good stray light control and a 10%+ increase in fov its got to be a real contender.
Whether I`ll bother given how much I like my 42mm SF I`m not sure. I still think its too expensive, and the current 42mm models don`t "feel" like £2.3k quality IMHO.
That i think is part of the crux of the issue with the 32SF, as a main bin or otherwise.
For the gentleman-birder advancing in years, who may have decided that his eye dilation can be met by the 4mm EP of a 32mm, they are likely to already own one - the luckier ones perhaps a Zeiss, Swaro or Leica.
For others being asked to shell out in excess of £2k will they go for what is a fairly lengthy 32mm, or just think that for the same money they can get an 8x42? Less weight, more FoV against less light ('y' canna change the laws of physics, Jim!')
It will be interesting to see how Zeiss pitch their marketing; for me, it is too sizeable an investment to swap from an FL to an SF but i guess others may feel differently, particularly if a little more financially blessed than myself.